- Scott Pape dismisses the Coalition's housing proposal.
- Michael Sukkar aimed at adjusting lending criteria
- EXPLORE FURTHER: The Barefoot Investor advises Australians to prepare for potential increases in living costs.
The Barefoot Investor has strongly criticized a suggestion by the Coalition to relax borrowing regulations, aiming to assist Australians in purchasing homes, arguing that it will merely inflate real estate costs.
Scott Pape stated this following concerns raised by renter Penny who reached out asking about the suggestion that was backed by the opposition. housing minister Michael Sukkar.
"I am 32 years old, work as a teacher, and currently rent an apartment with my partner, who is also a teacher," she shared.
We're putting in significant effort and cutting costs wherever possible, yet the notion of becoming homeowners seems out of reach. Melbourne It still seems unattainable.
We don’t come from wealthy families with benefactors; my mother is a renter too, and my partner’s parents are still working on paying off their house.
'I was scrolling through property updates when I came across an article citing the Liberals' intentions to relax borrowing regulations to assist purchasers who don’t have financial support from their parents. Does this policy change hold significance for folks like us, or is it merely election-season talk?'
Mr. Sukkar disclosed on Tuesday that his focus would be on the serviceability buffer for home loans should the Coalition regain power in the upcoming federal election. election .
The financial regulator – the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority – requires banks to consider home loan applicants' ability to service their mortgage at the current interest rate, plus an additional three per cent.
Previously, the buffer was set at 2.5 percent, but it was increased during the Covid pandemic.
The Barefoot Investor indicated that the buffer serves as a 'stress test'.
"When applying for a mortgage, the bank verifies whether you can still manage the payments even if interest rates increase," he stated in his column for NewsCorp .
'If the interest rate is 6 percent, they check if you can still manage payments at 9 percent.'
It's referred to as a "stress test"—designed to prevent individuals from taking on more debt than they can handle when interest rates increase.
And, as a financial counselor, I believe this is a very wise policy that maintains pressure on bankers.
Mr. Pape mentioned that Mr. Sukkar had a different perspective on the matter.
'He contends that reducing the buffer would enable first-time homebuyers to secure larger loans. This statement holds merit,' he noted.
However, consider this for approximately six seconds: Reducing the buffer would allow everybody to borrow more – which they undoubtedly would – and all that would accomplish is pushing house prices higher still.
Sukkar’s plan is akin to coveting the final limp dim sim that has been lingering in the servo steamer since last Sunday.
Penny, I understand you're hungry, but if you decide to consume whatever Sukkar is offering, ensure you keep a hazmat suit ready, a frozen roll of toilet paper available, and contact a plumber beforehand.
When the statement was made, Mr. Sukkar indicated that there was an inherent prejudice supporting wealth passed down through generations.
"At present, individuals in Australia who do not have access to the 'Bank of Mum and Dad' face higher lending expenses—even though their inherent risk might be the same or less," he stated.
That represents a systematic preference for wealth passed down through generations. We aim to eliminate this bias.
The Coalition will not tolerate a scenario where a generation of Australians lacks the same chances for homeownership as those from preceding generations.
Read more