The Top Stable Shoes for All Kinds of Runs (2025)
These 12 cutting-edge running shoes will maintain your stability without compromising comfort or hindering your progress.
At a Glance
- The New Era of Stability
- Key Features to Seek in a Stability Shoe
- Beyond the Shoe
- What Shoes We Included
- How We Tested
- Best All-Around: Asics Kayano 31 ($165)
- Runner-up Best All-Around: Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 ($164)
- Best Plush Stability: Puma ForeverRUN Nitro 2 ($150)
- Runner-up Best Plush: Diadora Nucleo 2 ($160)
- Best Firm, Responsive Support: Brooks Adrenaline GTS 24 ($140)
- Runner-up Best Firm Support: Topo UltraFly 5 ($140)
- Most Invisible Support: Altra Experience Form ($145)
- Best Full-Foot Support: New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14 ($140)
- Best for Racing: Brooks Hyperion GTS 2 ($140)
- Best for Up-Tempo Days: Saucony Tempus 2 ($160)
- Best for Going Long: Coast to Mountain P1 ($160)
- Best for Recovery Days: Hoka Gaviota 5 ($175)
The New Era of Balance Footwear
Determining what constitutes a stability running shoe has become more complex, which is actually beneficial. In the past, identifying such shoes was straightforward; they were characterized by their firm, dark-colored foam under the inner part of the midsole known as a medial post, meant to prevent excessive inward rolling of the foot during motion. While jogging, these shoes stood out due to their rigid, bulky build aimed at control. This is not always true today.
Modern stability shoes are highly cushioned, providing a seamless ride without bulky control features. As such, they tend to be just as comfortable for neutral runners as for those requiring additional support. Instead of relying on rigid medial posts, designers now employ various subtle and seamlessly integrated techniques to assist runners with excessive foot pronation or supination.
It’s high time, considering that the science It has been demonstrated since the 1990s that too much pronation seldom causes issues, and conventional techniques aimed at controlling excess movement within shoes have proven ineffective. However, transformation within this sector and among the general populace deeply entrenched in these practices has progressed gradually over time. pronation paradigm Although the demand for stability shoes and the variety of such models has significantly declined over the last ten years, substantial changes in their appearance and performance have only emerged relatively recently.
Stability depends on numerous factors including the design of the sole, the thickness of the cushioning layer, the firmness of the midsole, the type of outsole material used, along with the properties and structure of the upper part—this isn’t limited to medial posting alone," explains Kurt Stockbridge, who serves as the vice president for product development at Skechers. "All these elements can be adjusted individually to create a highly stable shoe without adhering strictly to conventional designs.
The latest stability shoe designs acknowledge that each component of the footwear influences the overall feel underfoot. These innovative approaches aim to mitigate the inherent instability created by the design, which often lifts the foot further away from the ground. Surprisingly, even numerous neutral shoes—typically not promoted as stabilizing options—are now incorporating enhanced stabilization features to counteract the unsteadiness associated with thicker, softer midsoles.
Key Features to Seek in a Stability Shoe
When recommending stability shoes to my patients, I advise them to seek out those with a straight last design," explains Paul Langer, a sports podiatrist at Twin Cities Orthopedics and former president of the American Association of Podiatric Sports Medicine. A straight-last shoe has an internal structure that fills in the arch area, allowing for a continuous straight line along the side of the sole from the heel to the ball of the foot, providing comprehensive support underneath the entire arch. "In truly straight-last footwear, it becomes impossible to determine whether it’s meant for your left or right foot due to this uniformity," adds Langer. "Typically, most shoes have some degree of curvature; however, the lesser the curve, the greater the shoe's overall stability."
Langer views this broad base as more crucial for stability compared to the thicker medial support, which has traditionally determined the stability classification. "When discussing stability," he explains, "I'm likely focusing more on the design of the shoe rather than the positioning aspect."
This applies equally to other stabilization elements such as guide rails, frames, plates, or heel counters. "I worry less about these components," Langer states, citing studies indicating that such devices do not manage or rectify overpronation issues. Nonetheless, he acknowledges the role of stabilization techniques, noting they may lessen the unsteadiness brought on by compressing into softer foam materials. "Stabilization footwear does not fix problems," Langer clarifies. "It merely tends to be slightly more stable compared to regular shoes."
Langer also mentions, "I aim to assist my patients in realizing that a padded shoe naturally offers less stability compared to walking barefoot." When you land with a force equivalent to two to three times your body weight onto an ample layer of soft foam, the compression tends to be uneven due to its inherent properties, thereby amplifying any asymmetries. Therefore, despite numerous shoes now being crafted with straighter, fuller forms, one must take into account both the thickness and density of the foam used.
Identifying the right mix of cushioning, design, and support characteristics that suits your needs requires testing several models and figuring out which one fits best. provides optimal comfort for your step and gait . This “ comfort filter , serves as our best starting point according to Langer. This involves evaluating which shoes offer the most natural alignment.
Emily Stefanski, a sports podiatrist at Coastline Foot and Ankle serving Connecticut and Rhode Island, who was once a Division 1 college long-distance runner before becoming a marathon competitor, agrees with this sentiment. She states, "My advice to patients is to choose based on comfort for their feet." However, she adds, "While I do have certain recommendations that seem ideal from my perspective, they aren’t always suitable because various elements come into play."
Past the Sole: Diversity and Resilience
Remember that even when you find a shoe that enhances your walking style, shouldn't be the only pair of shoes you own . A handful of studies demonstrate that runners experience fewer injuries when they cycle between various pairs of shoes. "The key isn’t necessarily discovering the ideal shoe, but rather understanding that your feet should remain robust and flexible by varying your footwear choices and exposing them to differing levels of stress and load," explains Langer. Thus, select a stability shoe that suits you well for everyday training, yet also possess a minimalist option (perhaps solely for walking or gardening tasks) and occasionally opt for running in one. low, flexible trainer as well as a soft, curved one.
Stefanski additionally mentions, "My aim is always to emphasize a significant amount of strength training." Coaches, physical therapists, biomechanists, and podiatrists concur that excessive pronation and other balance problems typically arise due to strength and mobility problems , and this issue frequently improves by enhancing your technique across the entire sequence starting from your feet up to your hips. Stafanski states, "I think we have the potential to enhance our performance gradually over time, and most individuals don’t necessarily require lifelong reliance on stability shoes—they can transition away from them. The key factor is how dedicated people are to performing these exercises."
What Shoes We Included
Considering the flexible interpretation of what constitutes a stability shoe, the criteria for compiling a list of such footwear can be quite subjective. We decided to feature only those models equipped with specific structures or designs intended to control the foot’s movement during motion.
We didn't incorporate plated shoes into this guide, even though certain runners believe that the arched plates in top-tier running shoes and training shoes offer enough support for their gait. Stefanski remarks, "With my extremely flexible athletes, I've found that fitting them into carbon-plated shoes works perfectly; they require nothing more." Nevertheless, others discover that these plated shoes actually increase their unsteadiness. each super shoe performs differently ).
Think of this as a selection of footwear crafted particularly for individuals requiring assistance in preventing excessive rotation of their feet; however, understand that it’s neither comprehensive nor restrictive. There might be alternative designs featuring broad foundations and midsoles engineered to minimize side-to-side force and facilitate smoother movement from heel strike to push off, which could offer similar stability suited just as well to your needs.
The Methodology Behind Our Testing of Stability Shoes
After running in dozens of new shoe models this year, I sorted out those with stability features and completed multiple runs in each of them at a variety of distances and paces. Most models were also run in by more than 20 wear-testers who help select and inform the reviews in our best running shoe round-ups.
Here’s my background: I have been involved in running since the latter part of the 1970s and have worked as both an editor and shoe reviewer for a running magazine starting from the year 2000. Additionally, I am also the writer of several publications. Your Best Stride , and Run Strong, Stay Hungry Once upon a time, I was a consistent runner who clocked in at around 2 hours and 46 minutes for marathons, putting in over 50 miles each week. However, due to recurring injuries and advancing years, both my mileage has halved and my comfortable running speed has decreased. These injuries have made finding appropriate shoe supports quite challenging. Specifically, my left foot is naturally high-arched with an ideal fit needing minimal intervention, whereas my right foot requires more substantial support because of past sprains. Unfortunately, excessive lateral support causes discomfort in my right knee since it tends to roll inward to alleviate strain caused by a long-term issue. Given this complex situation, testing out these newer, less rigidly supportive shoes seems like just what I need—ones designed to adjust according to individual needs.
Best Stability Shoes 2025
Best All-Around
Asics GEL-Kayano 31
$165 at Amazon (Men’s) $165 at Amazon (Women’s)
Weight: 10.8 ounces (for men), 9.5 ounces (for women)
Stack Height: 40-30 mm for men; 39-29 mm for women
Drop: 10 mm
Stability Strategy: Plush, highly responsive inner post. Broad, outward-sloping bottom. Carved midsole.
The 30th-anniversary edition of the Kayano showcased one of the most significant shifts in stability technology within the footwear industry last year. Over thirty years, the Kayano model maintained control over runners' strides through robust elements like a pronounced medial post and a stiff midfoot support bridge. However, for the Kayano 30—and continuing into the Kayano 31—this conventional approach was supplanted by an innovative design featuring subtle geometrical enhancements and less intrusive mechanisms aimed at guiding the foot more naturally.
The platform boasts an expansive design from the heel to the toes, with additional width beneath the ball of the foot. On the outer part of the heel, the structure is carved away to allow for greater compression, which helps smooth and decelerate the shift from initial heel strike to mid-stance. Conversely, a protrusion on the inner side limits compression, while the midsole rises around the backside of the heel, providing containment and gentle support.
The most distinctive feature is a section of softer, low-density yet very reactive foam located beneath the arch where earlier models featured a firm medial support. According to ASICS, this softer segment compresses upon loading, thereby expanding the effective width of the midfoot area. Additionally, owing to its superior bounce compared to the primary material, it helps guide your foot back into a more efficient position during the transition from mid-stance phase.
This new insert is based on research indicating that it isn’t the level of pronation which makes runners more susceptible to injuries but rather something else. duration of time at maximum pronation Therefore, rather than attempting to prevent the foot from rotating, the shoe swiftly brings it back to a centered stance.
While running, I failed to spot the bump beneath the arch, but I could tell it had an impact as my weight shifted smoothly towards the front part of my foot, making me feel balanced and prepared for propulsion. Primarily, what stood out was how wide the shoe was—it offered ample room without being overly loose—along with providing great stability during each stride from heel strike through toe-off. Even with a substantial midsole measuring 40mm thick, I never experienced instability; this can be attributed to the harmonious blend of softness and bounce-back capability, coupled with unexpectedly pliable forefoot construction. Although the overall experience wasn't geared toward speed, it remained comfortable and free-flowing, avoiding stiffness altogether. Both of my differently shaped feet received excellent support throughout, which became more apparent on extended jogs where fatigue began setting in.
The updated, engineered mesh upper of the 31 enhances the smooth feel and keeps your foot secure with soft yet moderate cushioning. Additionally, Asics decreased the lateral heel flare found in the Kayano 30, which previously caused unintended rotational force upon landing. This change now features a rounded edge that gently guides your foot to the ground, even during a firm heel strike.
Overall, the Kayano 31 is a footwear option suitable for almost any runner, offering comfort and support that remains unobtrusive while seemingly decreasing tiredness.
Runner-up Best All-Around
Brooks Glycerin GTS 22
$165 at REI (Men’s) $165 at REI (Women’s)
Weight: 10.7 ounces (for men), 9.5 ounces (for women)
Stack Height: 38–28 mm (forefoot)
Drop: 10 mm
Stability Strategy: Guidesrails. Adjusted middle sole cushioning. Broad, direct form.
We awarded the Glycerin GTS 21 as "The Best All-Around Stability Shoe" last year due to its excellent combination of cushioning comfort and supportive stability. In this latest iteration—the 22nd model—Brooks has integrated their well-known GuideRails, which consist of raised walls atop the midsole around the back part of the foot on either side, with firmer material on the inner side near the arch. Additionally, they've introduced an innovative element: specially calibrated midsole foam.
What sets apart Brooks' nitrogen-filled specially adjusted midsole, which we first noticed in Glycerin Max last autumn , which means it is softer on the outside and firmer on the inside—a slightly firmer feel in the heel but much more firm in the forefoot—within the same piece of foam. Advanced technology enables Brooks to adjust the characteristics of various segments within a foam midsole during production.
Carson Caprara, who serves as the senior vice president of footwear at Brooks, mentions that they introduce two distinct chemical compositions into the midsole mold prior to initiating the supercritical gas-infusion technique. "Once this mixture encounters the pressurized nitrogen infusion," he elaborates, "the two types of cellular structures respond differently—the internal cells remain relatively compact whereas the external ones expand more noticeably, resulting in increased suppleness and leniency. This entire procedure occurs seamlessly without any joints or protrusions, thereby providing an uninterrupted consistency."
Brooks adjusts the foam so that the midsole contains a greater proportion of larger cells in the heel for better shock absorption during landing. This gradually shifts to predominantly smaller cells in the responsive forefoot area. As a consequence, the running experience becomes notably plush when the outer foam absorbs impacts, yet remains firm as your bodyweight seamlessly moves towards the front part of the foot and propels you forward. In this newer version, I noticed enhanced protection coupled with increased responsiveness compared to the previous Glycerin 21. My strides were agile, allowing me to cover distances quicker than anticipated without feeling fatigued.
The combination of guide rails in the rear, the firmer, tuned foam up front, and a slightly more filled-in shape under the arch, delivered mostly non-intrusive stability from touch down to toe-off. I could, however, feel the pressure of the guide rail under my arch more than in previous versions, especially toward the front where the foam under it firmed up. This was comfortingly supportive for my foot that needs bolstering but felt a bit controlling for my neutral foot. That lack of versatility kept us from naming the Glycerin 22 best all-around, but the stronger support makes it a better choice for those who want the guidance.
Best Plush Stability
Puma ForeverRUN Nitro 2
$150 at Running Warehouse (For Men) $150 at The Running Warehouse (For Women)
Weight: 10.7 oz (for men); 16.9 oz (for women)
Stack Height: 38–28 mm
Drop: 10 mm
Stability Strategy: Sturdier foam structure. Broad, angular design.
Puma's nitrogen-enhanced TPE foam provides an exceptionally smooth experience for your step, efficiently reducing impact during landing and propelling you forward with energy as you push off from the toes. In the ForeverRUN Nitro 2 model, they utilize two different density levels of this foam—an inner layer that is more pliable surrounded by a tougher outer rim—which enhances overall stability without attempting to restrict foot movement. According to Conor Cashin, who serves as the senior product line manager at Puma, "Our focus was on examining the the rate at which runners were experiencing inward rolling of their feet And we genuinely attempted to emphasize reducing that pace while still permitting runners to pronate within limits, as this is the body’s inherent method of providing shock absorption."
This revised edition features the two foams being molded simultaneously instead of being layered and bonded, resulting in a more seamless integration. "By extending the soft nitro foam from the bottom up throughout the sole," explains Cashin, "we achieved enhanced cushioning and response. The firmer nitro foam surrounding the foot provides the necessary stability."
The sole has been considerably broadened —especially beneath the arch in the midfoot area—to improve steadiness, and it’s also two millimeters thicker, contributing to greater comfort underfoot. However, the real highlight of this footwear lies in its engineered, circular-knit upper which cradles the foot exceptionally well. It features a generously padded heel collar, wraps comfortably around the foot with slight elasticity, and secures the midfoot using lightweight, printed reinforcement panels.
While running, the initial impression was formed by how smoothly cushioned the ride felt (consistent with expectations), ensuring nothing disrupted my natural gait. Despite having a tall profile due to the elevated sole, the bike remained steady because of its broad design and sturdier edge structure. The rigidity could be sensed predominantly beneath my main toe, offering enhanced stability as pressure shifted during movement. This provided a reliable platform aiding both propulsion and directional changes. Although this footwear excels in comfort for relaxed sessions, it also possesses sufficient springiness in the middle section which allows efficient performance even during faster-paced activities like speed workouts or sudden accelerations.
Runner-up, Plush Stability
Diadora Nucleo 2
$160 at Diadora (Men’s) $160 at Diadora (Women’s)
Weight: 9.7 ounces for men; 7.4 ounces for women
Stack Height: 35–30 mm
Drop: 5 mm
Stability Strategy: Unconventional geometry. Broad, linear form. Side walls. Reactive foam.
After running with the Nucleo 2, my initial impression noted "a smooth, comfortable ride with excellent support." This comfort comes largely from the thick foam beneath the balls and toes due to the minimal 5-millimeter heel-to-toe offset, which allows for a gentle landing as your foot rolls forward. Supportiveness arises from this same foam’s ability to rebound quickly, offering an energetic feel when you push off during each stride.
Stability is achieved through geometric design: the broad midsole foam features cut-out sections that permit greater compression, while being reinforced underneath the arch to reduce flexibility and enhance support. The elevated walls on either side of the shoe softly embrace and stabilize the back part of your foot.
While running, what stood out was the soft foam beneath the lateral part of the midfoot—not too solid yet not intrusive—giving me a reassuring feeling of stability. The cushioned upper and padded tongue cradled my foot comfortably without letting it slip around. However, my sole criticism was that the heel seemed overly broad, which caused some unwanted rotation upon landing during slower runs with a forceful heel-strike.
The Nucleo 2 offers such nuanced stability guidance that a typical runner might not even pick up on it, which makes this everyday training shoe suitable for almost everyone except those who require significant rotational support. Whether I sought out comfort or simply planned to go at an easy pace, I frequently turned to these shoes.
Ideal for Solidness, Reactive Assistance
Brooks Adrenaline GTS 24
$140 at REI (Men’s) $140 at REI (Women’s)
Weight: 8.0 ounces (for women); 10.0 ounces (for men)
Stack Height: 35.5–23.5 mm
Drop: 12 mm
Stability Strategy: Guiding rails. Broad, direct foundation. Sturdy reactive midsole.
Back in 2019, Brooks revamped the Adrenaline, which was known for its dense, full-height medial post—a key feature of their signature stability shoe. They swapped this out for something called GuideRails, now featured in the stability versions across their entire line of footwear. This new system consists of bands of firmer foam atop the midsole running along both sides from the heel towards the center of the arch. On the inner side near the arch, these bands are firmer to curb excessive pronation; meanwhile, on the outside edge, they match the firmness of the rest of the midsole to prevent lateral slippage. Unlike traditional posts, GuideRails provide enhanced comfort through reduced weight and improved smoothness without being overly restrictive. Additionally, because they intervene selectively based on necessity rather than constantly correcting every movement, they cater effectively to a broader spectrum of runners.
[The GuideRail] does not extend entirely to the ground, allowing the shoe some flexibility," explains Jon Teipen, who serves as the principal footwear product line manager at Brooks. "It won't create a rigid barrier on the inner part of the shoe. As you roll your foot inward more, the GuideRail will provide increasing resistance.
This season’s Adrenaline features an updated nitrogen-infused EVA-blend midsole foam that is both lighter and significantly softer, yet remains calibrated for supportive performance beyond mere cushioning, resulting in a notably lively ride. A specially designed mesh upper ensures a snug and comfy fit, reinforcing the midfoot area through a dual-layer arch section while maintaining breathability and flexibility around the toe box. With a 12-millimeter heel-to-toe offset, average stack heights, pliable forefeet, and enhanced underside support beneath the arch—a feature accentuated by a straighter design this year—the Adrenaline 24 offers the most conventional stability-oriented experience among these models.
Despite being less rigid and cumbersome than previous versions, the new Adrenaline offers a comfortable and unobtrusive ride, featuring gentle rearfoot support. The cushioning and stability excel particularly during heel strikes and throughout strides; however, they still perform well when accelerating and maintaining a forefoot gait. Thanks to this adaptability and reliable support, the Adrenaline can effortlessly become your everyday training shoe.
Second-place for Best Firm, Outstanding Customer Service
Topo UltraFly 5
$140 at REI (Men’s) $140 at REI (Women’s)
Weight: 9.9 ounces (for men), 8.0 ounces (for women)
Stack Height: 30–25 mm
Drop: 5 mm
Stability Strategy: Midline posting. Ample forefoot width featuring significant big toe flare. Minimal heel-to-toe offset. Linear design.
The Topo UltraFly 5 shoes blend classic elements such as a medial post with a sleek, modern aesthetic. Primarily offering noticeable support through its broad front section (especially around the big toe area), minimal 5mm heel-to-toe offset, and moderately thick yet reactive cushioning, they also incorporate an additional layer of denser material beneath the arch to minimize compression and twisting motions. However, this stiffer segment within the midsole extends just halfway up at its highest point underneath the arch before gradually diminishing towards both the toes and the rear part near the heel. Together, these components create a balanced sensation across the entire sole unit during pronation, ensuring stable contact throughout your stride while still allowing for organic movements.
While running, the standout feature was the ample space in the front part of the shoe: the upper design allowed my toes to spread naturally, making it comfortable to wear full CorrectToes. Additionally, the broad foundation provided stability and ensured a secure footing during push-offs, eliminating any feeling of instability. This athletic posture was further improved by the lightweight, reactive ZipFoam used in Topo’s sole, which offered sufficient cushioning upon landing yet maintained close-to-the-ground responsiveness. The snug fit around the midfoot complemented the open feel at the forefront, allowing me to enjoy comfort without worrying about slippage.
While not the most streamlined option out there, this shoe provides a light feel despite offering protection and support. Each time I laced them up, they seemed to make my pace quicker and enhance my sense of stride, leading to improved efficiency throughout the run. They encouraged engagement from my toes and feet, which also contributed to better posture. Regardless of whether I began feeling fatigued, particularly on those easier days when I needed some relief, I found myself reluctant to finish my runs with the UltraFly 5.
Most Invisible Support
Altra Experience Form
$145 at REI (Men’s) $145 at REI (Women’s)
Weight: 9.6 ounces (for men), 7.8 ounces (for women)
Stack Height: 32–28 mm for men; 30–26 mm for women
Drop: 4 mm
Stability Strategy: Guiding rails. Broad toe box. Minimal heel-to-toe drop. Linear design.
Every Altra shoe ensures stability via a well-balanced, low-offset design paired with an ample toe box that permits your foot to splay naturally and maintain a proper posture. Thanks to this approach, the company can utilize plush, responsive cushioning instead of inflexible support structures and firm stabilization mechanisms—predating many competitors' experiments with different geometries.
Their latest 4mm drop series, known as the Experience Form, incorporates a stabilization system where guide rails run along either side of the heel. This design features an enhanced outer edge that sits higher on one side of the arch, maintaining the same firmness level across the entire midsole for a comforting yet restraining embrace around your foot’s natural movement. It avoids exerting undue force against rotational motion. At the bottom, you'll find a straightforward sole structure designed with extra support under the arch compared to previous versions within this range, offering comprehensive coverage from toe to heel.
Above these structural elements lies an advanced mesh fabric that forms the shoe’s top portion. While sleek and unobtrusive aesthetically, ensuring minimal interference at the forefoot area, this material still ensures snug fitment through reinforced sections over the ankle and midfoot regions.
I discovered that the Experience Form shoe offers a plush yet reactive feel, being less cushioned and springy compared to numerous contemporary footwear options due to its average midsole thickness made from CMEVA. It feels lightweight and agile, promoting rapid interaction with the ground and a seamless transition through the forefoot, which includes a mild rocking motion along with easy bending that mimics natural movement. During runs, the stability elements were entirely unnoticed; however, they provided firm grounding during strides at various speeds—whether maintaining an effortless gait or accelerating. Regardless of my intended speed, I frequently ended up picking up the pace spontaneously because of how enjoyable this blend of featherlight agility, comfortable connection, and discreet support can be.
Best Full-Foot Support
New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14
$140 at REI (Men’s) $140 at REI (Women’s)
Weight: 10.7 ounces for men, 8.6 ounces for women
Stack Height: 35.5–27.5 mm
Drop: 8 mm
Stability Strategy: Inclined plate paired with a two-tone midsole. Broad, straight foundation.
Every one of the integrated shank plates currently prevalent in modern running footwear primarily serves to steady the compression and spring back of substantial layers of soft yet reactive cushioning material. Although most inserts like those seen in racing flats for marathons play this role, super shoes Focus on improving the execution of forward rolls and push-offs; others mainly help control side-to-side movement, such as Skechers' winglets and H-shaped supports, or the midfoot wings found on the plastic plate in the Saucony Endorphin Speed.
In New Balance’s entirely revamped 860 model, they've replaced the conventional rigid medial support with an innovative plate design. A flexible EVA layer, previously introduced in their Vongo series, sits between two foam sections—softer material atop firmer—which slopes such that it stands taller on the inner arch part and shorter on the outer edge. Consequently, this setup forms a base where harder foam supports beneath the arch area, whereas softer padding faces outward for impact absorption. Additionally, the plate features hexagon-shaped openings primarily along the outside section reducing stiffness here yet maintaining solidity inside. These elements combined ensure a gentle touchdown followed by controlled pronation motion all while keeping comfort intact and avoiding abrupt shifts during movement.
The 860 v14's plate serves more than just the purpose of shaping that angular design, according to Paul Zielinski, who holds the position of senior global product manager at New Balance. Their laboratory research indicated that midsole foams tend to extend under pressure during instances where the foot overpronates or moves quickly. According to Zielinski, "This plate makes the foam somewhat firmer and less prone to stretching or shearing." When used alongside the dual-density midsole materials, he explains, this setup aids in stabilizing the overall platform of the shoe, ensuring that the foot experiences consistent guidance throughout each stride—from heel strike through push-off.
The extra cushioning in the front part of the shoe, thanks to a reduced heel-to-toe difference, a sloped heel design, and a more pronounced curved shape, ensures a seamless roll from the middle foot to pushing off at the toes.
Ouch, my foot! This shoe offered the best full-foot rotational stability among those tested thanks to its plate and dual-density foam. Although the midsole felt soft and provided a plush, smooth riding experience, my feet barely rolled inward at all. Surprisingly, the arch support did not cause issues for my naturally non-pronation prone left foot; however, quite soon into running, I noticed some discomfort. My right knee, which tends to roll inward, started feeling strained because it wouldn't move properly due to the firmness of the midsole’s wedge. Additionally, the tendons around my right ankle became sore post-run from battling against that firmer section.
The 860 v14 offers robust midfoot support, making it less adaptable for neutral runners compared to several alternatives featured here. However, it remains an excellent option for individuals aiming to reduce pronation speed with a sneaker known for providing a seamless and pleasant experience from heel strike to push-off.
Best for Racing
Brooks Hyperion GTS 2
$140 at Amazon (Men’s) $140 at Amazon (Women’s)
Weight: 7.6 ounces (for men), 6.9 ounces (for women)
Stack Height: 31.5–23.5 mm
Drop: 8 mm
Stability Strategy: Heel stabilizers. Slim midsole featuring fast-return foam.
The updated second iteration of the swift Hyperion GTS features a somewhat higher layer of a novel nitrogen-charged EVA blend midsole material, according to Brooks this new composition is both lighter and offers better responsiveness compared to its forerunner. During my test runs, this proved accurate as I found the foam provided notable resistance when compressed yet sprung back remarkably well, contributing to an energetic feel and motivating me to increase my speed.
Similar to other GTS series shoes from Brooks, the Hyperion GTS 2 includes stability guides—raised extensions made of firm foam located alongside the midsole foam near the heel and midfoot area. These elements aim to minimize excessive inward or outward foot movement during runs, particularly when fatigue sets in toward the latter stages. During my test run, these guiding structures were not noticeable until I realized there wasn't any instability at the back of the shoe. Instead, what stood out most was how securely connected I felt due to the low-profile midsole design, broader platform width, and absence of soft cushioning. This setup facilitated swift steps and steady takeoffs.
The ground feel is not minimalist at all; instead, the foam provides smooth cushioning and offers a comfortable experience regardless of your speed. This makes them ideal as an everyday training shoe for those who do not favor a high, soft density beneath their feet, which has become almost standard in today’s market. However, most runners will enjoy the Hyperion GTS 2 for its lightweight and bouncy characteristics. non-plated , an upbeat training and racing shoe that doesn't put excessive strain on your feet and provides support when needed in the latter miles. An added bonus is the newly designed, breathable mesh upper.
Best for Up-Tempo Days
Saucony Tempus 2
$160 at Running Warehouse (For Men) $160 at Running Warehouse (For Women)
Weight: 8.2 ounces (for women); 9.4 ounces (for men)
Stack Height: 33–25 mm
Drop: 8 mm
Stability Strategy: Frame designed with an over-under approach, incorporating strategically placed complementary foams.
The Tempus sits at the acute edge of the stability continuum, offering an agile ride that left me feeling sprightly, springy, and swift—all while maintaining directional control and support. The key to this sneaker lies within its midsole; it incorporates ultralight, highly cushioned, and supremely rebounding Pebax foam, typically known for instability, encased in a firmer, more stable EVA shell.
Employing a sturdier structure to manage softer foam isn’t novel. Typically, most shoes featuring such structures encase the lower part of the entire shoe in tougher materials for stability. This approach does provide firm support but also leads to more rigid landings and may speed up how quickly your feet move upon impact before rolling inward. In contrast, the Tempus utilizes an innovative top-and-bottom frame design where the sturdy component rests above the flexible Pebax at the heel, spans across beneath the middle section of the shoe, dips below the Pebax towards the front, and extends along the underside all the way to the toes.
This frame harnesses its magical properties through the strategic placement of Pebax at the base of the heel. Its flexibility helps mitigate the unsteadiness from the footwear upon contact with the ground, causing compression and deformation which rounds off the sole edges. This ensures a seamless, comfortable shift when your foot moves inward and progresses forward. Simultaneously, the stiffer structure enveloping the upper part of the heel cradles and stabilizes your foot over the platform. Underneath the middle section of your foot, the complete height frame decelerates rotational movement and provides necessary support. In the forefront area, direct beneath your feet, you experience the shock absorption and energy return characteristics of Pebax. Additionally, the harder foam underneath introduces some stiffness into the rocking mechanism facilitating swift rolling during push-off actions.
The revised engineered mesh upper in version 2 secures the midfoot more effectively, improving the bond between the foot and the shoe as well as the footwear's capability to excel at high speeds.
While running, the Tempus stood out as one of the most enjoyable and fun rides among the options tested. It was particularly adept at accommodating my varying stability requirements. The flexible Pebax material used on the underside of the heel allowed both feet to maintain a natural, slightly outward-tilted stance upon impact without forcing an unwanted inward twist like some of the models with rigid flared heels did. During the mid-foot roll, this shoe offered subtle yet noticeable support specifically tailored to my more mobile right foot, aiding the transition from midstance through toe-off smoothly, all while permitting necessary pronation for proper knee function. For my neutrally aligned left foot, there wasn’t any unnecessary intervention; instead, it experienced consistent comfort thanks to the responsive Pebax cushioning beneath.
The Tempus stands out with a sleeker design compared to traditional stability shoes, featuring a slimmer build through the heel and midfoot region. Instead of relying heavily on extra cushioning, this model utilizes a firm structure for arch support. Interestingly, it broadens considerably towards the forefoot area, matching the width of the widest options available.
This sneaker maintains a lower profile upfront which enhances the sensation of connecting directly with the ground, crucial for an efficient and powerful toe-off. Additionally, its flexibility ensures a smooth transition from heel strike to toe off regardless of your running speed or foot placement. Throughout various paces, testers found the shoe agile yet supportive; initial responsiveness paired seamlessly with consistent lateral steadiness during longer runs. Over time, the benefits like controlled rolling motion became increasingly apparent, making extended wear even more comfortable and reliable.
The Tempus can serve as a lively everyday runner or a reliable choice for marathons, particularly for those seeking the responsiveness of Pebax along with added support over extended distances. It makes an outstanding option for long-training runs aimed at preparing you for races in carbon-plated performance shoes.
Best for Going Long
Mount to Coast P1
$160 for Mount to Coast (Men’s) $160 for Mount to Coast (Women’s)
Weight: 9.9 ounces (equivalent to men’s size 9, women’s size 10.5)
Stack Height: 37–27 mm
Drop: 10 mm
Stability Strategy: Directing geometry and midsole insert. Arch support. Central insole.
Mount to Coast is a newly launched brand that focuses on crafting footwear designed specifically for ultramarathon runners. However, based on my personal experience with their shoes, I would say they offer comfort and utility even if you're not logging miles throughout the entire day.
The P1, part of Mount to Coast’s stability line, features the same nitrogen-infused, PEBA-based midsole technology present in their other models. R1 racer , offering a gentle, springy, and adaptable ride that seems more linked than one would expect from a 37-millimeter heel. The reactive foam, which is adjusted to be stiffer compared to the PEBA used in ultra-running shoes, delivers plush cushioning beneath your feet before firming up rapidly for better contact with the ground. This seamless experience allows for nearly barefoot movement and heightened awareness of the terrain while effectively absorbing hard impacts.
The design draws inspiration from minimalism, mirroring the contours of the foot with a close-fitting heel and a secure strap-like fit over the instep, before widening into a flared front section — particularly around the big toe area — offering ample roominess and a solid base for a completely spread-out foot. This steadiness is augmented by an S-curved piece of bendable plastic running from the middle part of the foot all the way beneath the large toe, delivering extra reinforcement along the typical pathway of forefoot movement. Research conducted by Mount to Coast suggests that minimizing unnecessary motion at the forefoot is crucial compared to addressing rear-foot rotation which many conventional stabilizing shoes focus on; they claim their innovation enhances overall foot positioning and assists in engaging the arch muscles effectively.
Wearing the P1 during runs provided a seamless heel-toe progression, complemented by a slight additional firmness beneath the forefoot that enhanced stability and propulsion. However, what stood out most was the dual-zone insole designed to secure and cushion my heel, combined with an arch wrap incorporated into the upper material and integrated with the lacing system. This setup gave me the sensation of having my foot tightly bound with athletic tape throughout each step, offering support and adapting dynamically as my foot moved through different phases of motion.
The adaptable P1 remained unobtrusive when I increased my speed, yet it didn't seem to lessen the exertion like certain rocker-shaped designs tend to do. On longer runs at an everyday pace, though, it enabled me to swiftly settle into a smooth, effective stride that effortlessly cranked out mile after mile, making me naturally prolong my workouts for as long as possible.
Best for Recovery Days
Hoka Gaviota 5
$175 at REI (Men’s) $175 at REI (Women’s)
Weight: 9.1 ounces (for women); 10.9 ounces (for men)
Stack Height: 34-28 mm (for women); 36-30 mm (for men)
Drop: 6 mm
Stability Strategy: Soft foam H-Frame. Broad and linear design. Lateral walls.
Even with their elevated stack heights, Hoka’s footwear maintains built-in stability thanks to their broad base, minimal heel-to-toe drop, and a secure heel enclosure resembling a cockpit. Their stable models have long incorporated a "J-frame" design for enhanced rotational control. This feature consists of denser foam integrated along the entire length of the medial side of the midsole and extending around to the outer part underneath.
The updated Gaviota 5 keeps its broad design and elevated side walls but replaces the J-frame with an H-frame. A thinner layer of foam sits above the midsole, encircling the edges of the shoe in an interconnected pattern resembling a figure-eight layout. When your foot presses down into this upper section, it settles further within the structure formed by the higher side walls from the lower yet still plush base layer beneath. According to Hoka, their innovative H-frame lets them employ softer materials without compromising support, thereby boosting comfort right next to where your foot makes contact.
While on the move, the structure seemed almost imperceptible, detectable primarily through an impression of balance as I settled into the soft cushioning interior. Nevertheless, along with the generous girth and snug fit provided by the pliable yet non-elastic creel Jacquard fabric above, this proved sufficient to prevent the thickly padded footwear from seeming unstable. Though it makes no claims about limiting internal twisting, the comprehensive support across the entire foot ensured that both my ankles and knees felt securely protected throughout even extended periods of running.