The 2025 Subaru Forester It is an updated version, yet Subaru did not significantly deviate from the recipe used in the previous generation. This remains a compact SUV with a boxy shape, excellent sightlines, versatile adaptability for adventures, and a straightforward approach to interior styling. The numerous enhancements introduced for 2025 aim to maintain its competitiveness; however, where does this place it among the top contenders within its segment?
Comparing it to the 2025 Honda CR-V It's an excellent starting point. This top-rated and widely favored compact SUV should definitely be considered by those looking for a smaller SUV model. Known for having minimal downsides and being versatile, it attracts a wide array of prospective buyers. The specialists at Edmunds delve deep into the specifics to determine which SUV offers greater value.
Space and visibility
The Forester excels when it comes to visibility. Its boxy design, large windows, slim roof supports, and lower hood create excellent frontward sightlines. Coupled with generous door apertures and thoughtfully placed seating positions, this vehicle is especially accommodating for elderly motorists.
The CR-V is the better choice for families, though, as it ultimately has more passenger and cargo space. It has nearly 2 extra inches of rear seat legroom and a much larger cargo area (how big depends on which powertrain you get). It’s not exactly hard to see out of the CR-V or climb aboard either.
The interior storage space is more advantageous in the CR-V, particularly with respect to the wireless charging pad available in higher trim levels – unlike the Forester’s version which lacks side rails, causing phones to slide around or even fall off entirely. However, at least the Subaru offers generously sized cup and bottle holders designed to securely hold your beverages in position.
Advantage: CR-V
Interior technology
For the 2025 model, the Forester comes with an 11.4-inch landscape-oriented touch screen, though this feature has been present in other Subaru vehicles for some time now. The interface may lag at times, and the visuals appear somewhat outdated. Nonetheless, the large icons are straightforward to view and interact with. Additionally, numerous physical buttons along with traditional analog dials contribute to making the Forester feel more recognizable for drivers moving over from earlier models.
The CR-V doesn’t lead the pack when it comes to vehicle technology. The basic 7-inch display is adequate, whereas the upgraded 9-inch screen available in higher trims boasts contemporary visuals. While some traditional buttons remain, overall, the CR-V appears and feels more current without giving you the sensation of stepping out of your time machine into an advanced automotive era.
Advantage: CR-V
Driving and fuel economy
The Forester will offer a hybrid option starting in late 2025, which should enhance both fuel efficiency and performance. As of now, Edmunds hasn’t evaluated this model, so our focus remains solely on its standard engine—a four-cylinder producing 180 horsepower. This vehicle accelerates from zero to 60 mph in around 9.2 seconds, which might feel sluggish during highway merges or when overtaking slower vehicles. However, it performs adequately within urban environments where quicker bursts aren’t as crucial.
Although earlier parts of this comparison were more closely contested, the CR-V clearly stands out here. It provides two engine options: a 190-horsepower turbocharged four-cylinder or a 204-horsepower four-cylinder paired with a hybrid system. In terms of performance, it beats the Subaru by at least one second whether tested on the racetrack or experienced during everyday driving. Additionally, the hybrid version impresses with its responsiveness and seamless operation.
The fuel efficiency is nearly identical between the Forester and the turbocharged CR-V, with both expected to deliver around 28-29 mpg combined according to the EPA estimates, varying slightly based on the trim levels. However, the hybrid version of the CR-V sees a significant improvement, achieving an approximate 37 mpg combined rating. Similarly, the forthcoming Forester Hybrid is anticipated to offer about 35 mpg combined.
When considering which one drives better regardless of the engine type, most would agree that the CR-V takes the lead. It boasts superior quietness and crisper handling. Additionally, it offers a smoother ride while still maintaining better agility. While the Forester does an adequate job of getting you to your destination, the CR-V goes beyond with its overall performance.
Advantage: CR-V
Edmunds says
This model didn't come close. The CR-V ranks as the second-best small SUV according to Edmunds, with the Forester placing at number 12. These rankings highlight their respective strengths. Despite this, the Forester remains an excellent option for individuals valuing outstanding visibility, straightforward interior controls, and off-road readiness thanks to features like ample ground clearance, elevated roof rails, and a robust all-wheel-drive system. However, for the majority of potential buyers, it's the CR-V they prefer.
_____
The narrative was supplied to The Associated Press by an automotive website. Edmunds James Riswick is an contributor for Edmunds.
James Riswick, The Canadian Press