A longtime Episcopalian priest is accusing President Donald Trump of exploiting Christianity to execute his own political agenda — and is giving Christians a clear choice going forward.
In a recent essay for Religion News Service , the Very Rev. Michael W. DeLashmutt argued that despite Trump embracing Christianity and the Bible as president, he has driven a wedge between different groups of Christians that don't fit into his unique framework. He added that the president has insisted that his "nationalist, triumphalist, often exclusionary" brand of Christianity puts him at odds with a significant population of fellow believers.
As outlined by DeLashmutt, the form of Christianity closely associated with Trumpism prioritizes power, triumph, and cultural supremacy. This version of faith tends to regard theological intricacies with skepticism and sees prophetic criticism as betrayal. Instead of adhering to the complex ethical demands found in the Sermon on the Mount, this interpretation favors a more straightforward storyline centered around success and failure.
READ MORE: 'Mature Up': Catholics Protest After Trump Claims They 'Adored' Image of Him as Pope
DeLashmutt drew parallels between Trump and the Roman Emperor Constantine, highlighting how both utilized a rigid understanding of Christianity to achieve their objective of bringing multiple regions under their control. He pointed out that similar to Trump, Constantine’s religious beliefs were inconsistent with the “varied, decentralized, and frequently theologically disparate” Christian communities prevalent during his era. DeLashmutt further remarked that when Constantine organized the Council of Nicaea In 325 C.E., this occurred not due to religious motivations but for the sake of "imperial stability."
“For the first time, being a follower of Christianity meant not just adhering to one’s beliefs in Jesus but also showing allegiance to the ruler. What used to be considered merely a spiritual rift within the church has now transformed into a potential challenge to the stability of the state,” he noted. “Christian doctrine was reshaped to serve as a tool for maintaining the unity of an empire. A comparable situation is currently taking place.”
The Episcopal clergyman noted that early Christians recognized the Roman Empire’s interpretation of Christianity conflicted with their beliefs, and that many chose to face misunderstanding, isolation, or even martyrdom rather than let their religion become “hijacked” by imperial authority. He cautioned that contemporary Christians who permit their faith to serve as a “means for political organization” are venturing into perilous territory.
Constantine's heritage is intricate. Had he not existed, Christianity could have faltered and failed to evolve into the worldwide religion it has become. However, this progression came at a price: a transformation of doctrine tailored to support imperial ambitions," DeLashmutt noted. "Contemporary Christians ought to reflect once more: Shall we adhere to a Christ who triumphs through crucifixion or one who endorses rulers to maintain His dominion?
READ MORE: CNN data analyst uncovers true motive behind Trump ceasing discussions of a third-term bid
Click here To access DeLashmutt's complete article in Religion News Service, visit their website.
Related Articles:
・ A flag outside Justice Samuel Alito’s vacation house was reportedly "literally carried by insurrectionists," according to a Jan. 6 investigator.
・ "Strictly Off Limits": Web Criticizes MAGA for "Harshly" Teasing Walz’s Neurodivergent Son
・ How Trump exposed the moral bankruptcy of the Christian right