News.Life

KRA Boosts Retail Prices on Imported Used Vehicles: Tax Changes Effective July 2025

DIWIDA.NEWS autos, cars, government regulations, rules and regulations, taxes

<ul>
 <li>
 
 The Kenya Revenue Authority (KRA) has implemented a revised tax schedule for calculating duties on imported used cars.
 
 </li>
 <li>
 
 The KRA stated that the revised timetable will commence on July 1, 2025, following comprehensive consultations with stakeholders.
 
 </li>
 <li>
 
 In an exclusive interview with Diwida.co.ke, car dealer Joseph Kairu Wambui observed a significant rise in the prices of imported used cars once the new regulations come into play.
 
 </li>
</ul>

 
 Wycliffe Musalia boasts more than six years of expertise in areas such as finance, business, technology, climate, and health reporting. His work offers significant understanding of both Kenyan and international economic patterns. Presently, he serves as a business editor.
 
 Diwida |.co.ke
 
 .
 


 Soon, Kenyans might have to delve deeper into their wallets when purchasing second-hand imported cars.

<img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/image/AA1Cd7WX" data-reference="image" src="https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1Cd7WX.jpg"/>

 The Kenya Revenue Authority (KRA) has introduced modifications to the Current Retail Selling Price (CRSP) schedule utilized for calculating customs values.

<h2>
 What is the updated timetable for second-hand vehicles that have been imported?
</h2>

 Lilian Nyawanda, the KRA Commissioner responsible for Customs and Border Control, stated that the updated tariff schedule will come into force on July 1, 2025.

<blockquote>
 The Kenya Revenue Authority (KRA) has announced that starting July 1, 2025, they will implement a revised Current Retail Selling Price (CRSP) schedule for calculating the customs value of second-hand cars being brought into the nation, as stated by Nyawanda in an announcement made available on Friday, May 30.
</blockquote>
<div class="post__embedded post__embedded--twitter js-embed">
 <div>
 
 
 </div>
</div>

 Nyawanda stated that the revised schedules were created after thorough consultations with various stakeholders.

<h2>
 Could the updated tax schedule influence vehicle pricing?
</h2>

 During an exclusive interview with
 
 Diwida |.co.ke
 
 The car dealership owner Joseph Kairu Wambui, widely recognized as Khalif Kairo, pointed out that the revised timetables will likely drive up costs for used import cars.


 Kairo pointed out that raising the customs value would increase taxes, which might force importers and dealers to recuperate additional expenses via higher selling prices.

<blockquote>
 "Higher taxes represent additional expenses for importers and dealers, which they may choose to transfer to customers. As a result, car prices are certain to rise," stated Kairo.
</blockquote>
<img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/image/AA1FNtC7" data-reference="image" src="https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1FNtC7.jpg"/>
<h2>
 What are the updated tariff regulations for importing second-hand vehicles?
</h2>

 The authorities stated that the updated Current Retail Selling Price (CRSP) schedule can be found on their website and urged importers along with other involved parties to review it thoroughly.


 The CRSP for popular models such as the Nissan Note X E-Power will be KSh 3.2 million, the Nissan Note X will cost KSh 3.7 million, and the Honda Fit Hybrid F will have a price of KSh 2.9 million.


 Toyota manufactures vehicles such as the Toyota Passo Moda ( priced at KSh 2.6 million ), the Toyota Prius S ( valued at KSh 5.7 million ), and the Toyota Vitz F ( costing KSh 3.4 million ).

<h2>
 Pre-owned vehicle costs in Kenya
</h2>

 Following the strengthening of the shilling, second-hand car prices in Kenya have remained low.


 In 2024, the cost of second-hand imports decreased as dealers reported higher sales volumes.


 The price of a pre-owned Subaru Outback 2017 has decreased to KSh 2.5 million from KSh 3 million, whereas the cost of a Nissan Note has fallen from KSh 1 million to KSh 850,000.


 Similar models such as the Mercedes-Benz C200 have seen their prices fall from KSh 3.5 million down to KSh 3 million, indicating a reduction of KSh 500,000.

KRA Boosts Retail Prices on Imported Used Vehicles: Tax Changes Effective July 2025

The Kenya Revenue Authority (KRA) has implemented a revised tax schedule for calculating duties on imported used cars. ...

International Approval for Updated Taxes on Plug-In Hybrid EVs

DIWIDA.NEWS autos, battery electric vehicles, cars, government regulations, taxes

The Thai cabinet has endorsed revisions in taxation aimed at promoting the purchase of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs), with these measures set to take effect starting January 1st of the upcoming year.
 
 
 The regulation amends the tax provisions for PHEVs, introducing the following changes:
 
 
 setting up an independent tax rate for PHEVs, different from that of hybrid electric vehicles;
 
 
 basing the tax calculation criteria solely on electric-powered driving range per charge; and
 
 
 eliminating fuel tank size as a factor in determining PHEV tax rates.
 
 
 The third factor has hindered Thailand's potential to become a manufacturing hub as requirements for fuel tanks are incompatible with international standards, Deputy Finance Minister Paopoom Rojanasakul said after Tuesday's cabinet meeting.
 
 
 The rule also adds unnecessary restrictions for consumers and discourages the adoption of PHEVs, he said.
 
 
 PHEV passenger cars or vehicles with seating capacity of 10 or less, and an electric-powered driving range of 80 kilometres or more per charge, are taxed at 5%.
 
 
 For plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) with a range of under 80 kilometers per charge, the tax rate is set at 10%.
 
 
 The updated guidelines are consistent with international benchmarks and aim to support Thailand’s position as a production hub for standardized PHEVs that cater to both local and overseas market demands, according to Mr Paopoom.
 
 
 It is anticipated that this regulation will boost investments in Thailand’s automobile industry, improve competitive edge amid the shift towards advanced vehicle technologies, and cater to the growing demand for plug-in hybrid electric vehicles in both city settings and between towns, as mentioned by him.
 
 
 Reduced excise taxes will apply to plug-in hybrid vehicles (PHEVs) that have a greater electric range.
 
 
 "This is an excellent step since consumers are interested in purchasing electric vehicles that offer extensive ranges," stated Surapong Paisitpatanapong, who serves as both the vice-chairman of the Federation of Thai Industries and the spokesperson for its Automotive Industry Club.
 
 
 He mentioned that orders for plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs), hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs), and battery electric vehicles (BEVs) surged at the recent Bangkok International Motor Show. The sales momentum kept increasing even after the event concluded on April 6th.
 
 
 This is a positive development during a time when domestic car sales have been slow because individuals are finding it hard to obtain auto financing.
 
 
 "This indicates that these buyers are fairly economically stable," stated Mr Surapong.
 

Provided by Syndigate Media Inc. (
Syndigate.info
).

International Approval for Updated Taxes on Plug-In Hybrid EVs

The Thai cabinet has endorsed revisions in taxation aimed at promoting the purchase of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs), with t...

Why the Proposed $250 Annual EV Tax Is a Load of Hot Air

DIWIDA.NEWS electric cars, government regulations, money, tax policy and law, taxes

<img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/image/AA1DWmdc" data-reference="image" src="https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1DWmdc.jpg"/>
 <h3>
 This is akin to paying taxes on almost 1,400 gallons of gasoline, which is roughly three times more than what an average internal combustion engine (ICE) commuter consumes in a year.
 </h3>
 <ul>
 <li>
 
 The federal government has suggested imposing a yearly registration charge of $250 for electric vehicle owners.
 
 </li>
 <li>
 
 The funds aim to tackle the insufficient income generated from the gas tax.
 
 </li>
 <li>
 
 However, the expense is akin to purchasing roughly 1,400 gallons of gasoline, which is almost triple the quantity an average commuter utilizes annually.
 
 </li>
 </ul>
 
 When you fill up your vehicle’s tank with gasoline, you’re contributing 18.4 cents directly into the federal government’s coffers for each gallon pumped. Although this amount may appear insignificant individually, collectively it plays a vital role in financing essential infrastructure improvements such as repairing roads, maintaining bridges, and supporting some aspects of public transit. The gas tax accounts for 81% of these funds.
 $43.5 billion in revenue added to the Highway Trust Fund,
 The program utilized to fund those projects in the previous year.
 
 
 So if you happen to be one of those environmentally conscious individuals driving an electric vehicle,
 dares
 To avoid the gas station completely, the federal government wants to inform you: it’s time to come up with $250.
 
 
 At first glance, this might appear reasonable – after all, gasoline vehicle owners contribute to funding road maintenance and development through taxes, so why not electric vehicle drivers as well? However, the situation is considerably more complex than it seems at first.
 
 <img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/image/AA1DWr1s" data-reference="image" src="https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1DWr1s.jpg"/>
 <h2>
 An Indecent Proposal
 </h2>
 
 It's all about the heart.
 new proposal
 By Representative Sam Graves, who serves as the chairman of the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee from Missouri and represents the Republican Party. The legislation he has proposed will undergo review by the committee this coming Wednesday. This bill suggests implementing a federal registration fee specifically targeted at electric-drive vehicles—a sum of $250 for fully electric cars ($EVs) and $100 for hybrid models—as well as an additional $20 charge applicable to every vehicle starting in 2031.
 Reuters
 shared the news earlier this week.
 
 
 According to calculations from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), it appears that the average U.S. driver consumes approximately 550 gallons of gasoline annually. This leads to an annual fuel tax expenditure of roughly $101 per driver.
 
 
 It seems quite high for electric vehicle owners, doesn’t it? And indeed, it is. Paying $250 (up from the initial suggestion of $200) is akin to covering the cost of approximately 1,100 gallons of fuel with today’s gas tax rates. This amount roughly doubles what a typical gasoline-powered car consumes annually and isn't a single payment but rather yearly. Under this plan, the average driver would effectively pay the $0.184 per gallon tax on around 1,389 gallons of gasoline each year.
 
 
 Notably, the bill excludes commercial and government vehicles from paying any registration fees. This means that rental car companies, Amazon’s delivery trucks, and large Class 8 semitrailers won’t incur extra—or proportionate—costs, even though they use the road infrastructure much more intensively compared to typical commuters.
 
 
 If implemented, it seems the federal government would transfer the responsibility of collecting fees to the state where the vehicle is registered, compelling the state to collect the registration fee on their behalf.
 
 
 If a state chooses not to enforce the fee, the government will instruct the FHWA to deduct funds equal to 125% of the registration fees starting from 2027. However, the legislation does not specify an effective date for when it would be implemented.
 if
 It proceeds as planned) but relies on the FHWA to set the timetable for developing a remittance process for the fees.
 
 <img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/image/AA1DWr1x" data-reference="image" src="https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1DWr1x.jpg"/>
 <div class="source-title">
 Photo by: Hyundai
 </div>
 <h2>
 The Ask Is Justified
 </h2>
 
 Graves' suggestion isn't entirely without value, and it sounds somewhat more palatable than the
 A $1,000 electric vehicle tax proposed by another Republican senator earlier this year
 After all, electric vehicles (EVs) aren’t contributing to the Highway Trust Fund via the federal gas tax because, well, they don’t require gasoline. Hybrids still contribute when refueling, with their roughly $100 yearly registration fee being comparable to what an average petrol vehicle pays. Additionally, hybrid drivers continue to pay for fuel at the pump. Maintaining roads isn’t automatic; the concept behind pooling these funds ensures we both avoid encountering colossal potholes big enough to rival the Grand Canyon.
 
 
 As EV ownership continues to grow, it's worth noting that out of the 292.3 million vehicles on American roads, around 4.1 million (1.4%) are electric. This equates to roughly $415 million in missed tax revenue.
 and growing
 . At least 39 states have already started tackling their tax shortages by
 imposing extra registration charges on electric vehicles
 .
 
 
 In Pennsylvania, where I reside and which was previously known for having the country’s highest gas tax at $0.576, an electric vehicle (EV) registration fee of $200 will come into effect in 2025. This fee will increase to $250 starting from 2026 onwards.
 exact same cost
 As with the federal proposal, but it's easier to accept due to PA's already extremely high gas tax.
 
 
 I have gone over the mathematics previously.
 , let's review that explanation one more time:
 
 <blockquote>
 
 For all you math enthusiasts out there, here’s a basic equation:
 
 x=(C/A)*T
 
 :
 
 
 
 X
 
 = Fair price
 
 
 
 C
 
 = Annual average commute
 
 
 
 T
 
 = Expense of gasoline tax (per gallon)
 
 
 
 A
 
 = Average economy
 
 
 Let me explain:
 
 
 According to the Environmental Protection Agency, the typical fuel efficiency stands at 24.4 miles per gallon for passenger vehicles. In contrast, light trucks and vans achieve approximately 17.8 miles per gallon. Additionally, data from the U.S. Federal Highway Administration indicates that the mean commuting distance among American drivers is about 13,476 miles annually.
 
 </blockquote>
 
 When we input these figures into my formula, it reveals that Pennsylvania should be collecting $318 as the "fair share" from the gas tax for electric vehicles. This indicates that PA is currently not charging drivers enough for theEVgas tax.
 
 
 The state compensates for this elsewhere, however. For instance, via a $0.0151 tax for each kilowatt-hour of electricity consumed.
 an average efficiency rating of 2.6 miles per kilowatt-hour
 The typical electric vehicle (EV) consumes approximately 5,183 kWh of electricity annually. This equates to roughly $78.27 in imposed taxes, bringing Pennsylvania’s total tax revenue from EVs and their energy sources to $328.27 by 2026 and thereafter, which is nearly equivalent to what is gathered from gasoline vehicles.
 
 <img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/image/AA1DWjQ9" data-reference="image" src="https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1DWjQ9.jpg"/>
 <h2>
 As Radioactive As Chernobyl
 </h2>
 
 I fully support the idea that everybody should contribute fairly. Yes, yes—I understand people might grumble “taxation is theft” regarding nearly every tax issue. Even though parting with money isn’t enjoyable for me, I’ll readily acknowledge that I ought to pay the same fee as any other driver using public roads, irrespective of whether they’re operating a fuel-efficient vehicle or not.
 
 
 This represents a fair and balanced approach. However, this legislation (along with its rationale) is neither just nor equitable; instead, it penalizes electric vehicle owners simply for using an EV and inadvertently provides support for those not yet willing to switch from gasoline vehicles.
 
 
 Let's dig into that a bit more by time-traveling back to 1993. Bill Clinton had just taken a seat in the Oval Office,
 Jurassic Park
 Was setting new standards at the box office and gasoline averaged only $1.11 per gallon. In that August, Clinton enacted comprehensive legislation that increased taxes by $268 billion—with part of this increase coming from raising the gas tax by $0.043 per gallon, boosting it from $0.141 to $0.184, which represented a rise of 30.5%.
 
 
 That raise sparked
 sharp criticism from politicians
 And the American public. Actually, during the Clinton administration,
 even open to discussing abolishing the tax
 In 1996, following then-Senator and Majority Leader Bob Dole’s decision to prioritize it as a key campaign issue during his presidential bid.
 
 
 In the end, the repeal was endorsed by the House but did not manage to get through the Senate, so the gasoline tax hike stayed intact.
 
 
 It has remained unchanged and continues to be so for an impressive span of 11,534 days, equivalent to 31.6 years. This duration stands as the longest gap in history since 1983, surpassing even 1959’s record-breaking halt on the gas tax at 23.5 years.
 
 
 When adjusted for inflation, the 1993 gas tax would equate to approximately $0.40 in today’s dollars, or
 more than twice
 What Americans are currently paying at the fuel pumps. With that in mind, Graves proposes an increase in the gas tax.
 would
 be fair
 if
 The gasoline tax was also raised to compensate for
 record- high inflation
 .
 
 
 Instead of increasing the gas tax, the government has opted to apply a massive $275 billion stopgap measure to the Highway Trust Fund using funds from America’s Treasury, otherwise known as the General Fund. This means we are still footing the bill for road maintenance, but through a more opaque method.
 
 <img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/image/AA1DQkIN" data-reference="image" src="https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1DQkIN.jpg"/>
 <div class="source-title">
 Photo by: Tesla
 </div>
 <h2>
 Divide the Path, Divide the Weight
 </h2>
 
 This alignment would hold true if the $250 registration fee for electric vehicles matched what an average internal combustion engine vehicle owner pays. However, it exceeds that amount by over twice as much. Should fairness truly be their objective, as Graves and his team assert, the calculations ought to demonstrate this principle accordingly. Charging almost 1,400 gallons of gasoline worth in fees when the typical driver consumes around 550 gallons seems less concerned with actual equality and more focused on appearances.
 
 
 A more effective solution would be to reduce the suggested electric vehicle (EV) and hybrid registration fees so they align more closely with the road usage costs of internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles based on the current gas tax rates.
 or
 Do what legislators seem hesitant to voice publicly: increase the gasoline tax. Imposing extra costs solely on electric vehicle owners without updating the taxation framework that originally funded road construction is unfair.
 
 
 Alternatively, maybe a more effective approach would be implementing a mileage-based charge. This way, both retail and commercial activities could be billed according to their usage.
 actually
 The concept of driving might evolve into a more equitable measure of contributing fairly. Certainly, the driver who logged 30,000 miles on their vehicle incurred higher registration costs due to greater usage compared to someone with only 3,000 miles on theirs. However, the main challenge lies in implementing a mileage-based tax system, particularly in regions where yearly inspections do not take place.
 
 
 Difficult does not equate to impossible, however. Until we see genuine political bravery leading to a comprehensive restructuring of the system, people purchasing advanced automotive technology shouldn’t bear the primary burden of highway expenses that were originally intended for an era dominated by gas-powered vehicles. True fairness means applying equity genuinely, not just nominally.
 
 <h2>
 More Political EV News
 </h2>


 <ul>
 
 <li>
 Some States Impose Additional Fees for Registering EVs and PHEVs
 </li>
 
 
 <li>
 Experts Warn: The Automotive Industry Faces an Imminent Downturn
 </li>
 
 
 <li>
 GM, Toyota, and Stellantis Support New Legislation Aimed at Reducing Stringency of Fuel Efficiency Standards
 </li>
 
 
 <li>
 Two New Bills Aim to Eliminate the EV Tax Credit and Impose a $1,000 Tax on Electric Vehicle Sales
 </li>
 
 </ul>

Why the Proposed $250 Annual EV Tax Is a Load of Hot Air

This is akin to paying taxes on almost 1,400 gallons of gasoline, which is roughly three times more than what an average internal com...

Health Minister Warns Private Hospitals: Watch Out for Unnecessary C-Sections

DIWIDA.NEWS government, government regulations, hospitals, news, politics

<img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/image/AA1D7Udn" data-reference="image" src="https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1D7Udn.jpg"/>

 <div class="section1">
 <div class="Normal">
 
 On Thursday, Hyderabad’s Health Minister Damodar Rajanarasimha sternly admonished private hospitals for performing unnecessary cesarean sections. He instructed health authorities to impose strict measures against these institutions and requested improved audits of all C-section procedures.
 
 
 Rajanarasimha instructed the officials to make sure that pregnant women understand the benefits of natural childbirth and the drawbacks of cesarean sections.
 
 
 Stressing the significance of boosting natural births in government hospitals, he suggested offering midwifery training to nurses working at these institutions. He also highlighted the necessity for enhancing the infrastructure of maternal and child healthcare centers to attract more expecting mothers to opt for public hospitals. He mentioned that every effort must be taken to alleviate the distress experienced by pregnant women, new moms, and babies in government hospitals, especially because of the high temperatures during summers.
 
 
 The minister likewise asked about the progress of staffing vacancies in government hospitals. Authorities informed him that more than 8,000 roles had been filled the previous year, and they were now working on accommodating another 6,200 openings.
 
 </div>
 </div>


 <div>
 Stay updated with the
 latest news
 on
 Times of India
 . Find all the current trends
 City News
 ,
 India News
 ,
 Business News
 , and
 Sports News
 . For
 Entertainment News
 ,
 TV News
 , and
 Lifestyle Tips
 , visit
 Etimes
 .
 </div>

Health Minister Warns Private Hospitals: Watch Out for Unnecessary C-Sections

On Thursday, Hyderabad’s Health Minister Damodar Rajanarasimha sternly admonished private hospitals for performing unnecessar...

Louisiana Aims to Ease Tax Burden for Seniors and Veterans

DIWIDA.NEWS government, government regulations, republicans, senior citizens, social welfare

<img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/image/AA1CyDsB" data-reference="image" src="https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1CyDsB.jpg"/>

 Representative Alonzo Knox has put forth House Bill 402, designed to offer extra tax breaks to elderly residents and disabled veterans in Louisiana.


 The proposed legislation includes an extra $12,500 state income tax deduction aimed at individuals who are 65 years old and above as well as veterans with certain disabilities.

Subscribe to our Newsletters

 Knox highlighted the significance of backing these organizations, especially when the economy is unstable, since numerous individuals rely on consistent earnings.


 "Given these unpredictable economic conditions, I believe our state should take initiative to support those who are most at risk, particularly our senior citizens who dedicated their lives to work and our veterans who have defended our nation," Knox stated.


 “If we managed to implement this for the richest individuals in Louisiana and for large corporations and businesses, then surely we should be able to extend support to those who are most susceptible and whom we value greatly within our community,” he stated.


 The legislative session starts on April 14 and has to conclude by June 12.


 
 TOP STORIES FROM WDSU:
 


 The special edition Stanley tumblers are being sold out rapidly, however, these remain available.


 
 READ THE FULL STORY:
 
 
 A Louisiana legislator suggests tax breaks for senior citizens and veterans.
 


 
 CHECK OUT WDSU:
 
 
 Find all the essential New Orleans updates here. From the most recent local weather forecasts to statewide sports and current events, WDSU keeps you ahead with comprehensive coverage as your premier source for news.

Louisiana Aims to Ease Tax Burden for Seniors and Veterans

Representative Alonzo Knox has put forth House Bill 402, designed to offer extra tax breaks to elderly residents and disabled veterans in...

NAFDAC Intensifies War on Fake Medicines, Appoints Global Inspector to Bolster CRIA Program

DIWIDA.NEWS business, drugs, government, government regulations, medicine and healthcare

ABUJA
 
 The National Agency for Food and Drug Administration and Control (NAFDAC) has intensified its campaign against the entry of substandard and fake medications into Nigeria by recently appointing Cotecna Inspection Services (CIS), an international testing and inspection company, to strengthen its Clean Report of Inspection and Analysis (CRIA) program in India.


 This action follows closely after NAFDAC’s historic confiscation, removal, and disposal of more than ₦1 trillion worth of inferior and outdated medications from key wholesale drug markets in Idumota, Onitsha, and Aba. It forms part of the organization’s extensive overhaul designed to crack down on dishonest importers and producers, notably those originating from China and India.


 Prof. Mojisola Adeyeye, the Director General of NAFDAC, revealed this information during a hybrid Technical Stakeholders' Meeting conducted in Lagos. Attendees included individuals from various sectoral groups, customs brokers, NAFDAC staff members, as well as representatives from CRIA based in China and India.


 Professor Adeyeye expressed concern over the worldwide issue of counterfeit and inferior drugs, characterizing this illicit activity as a highly profitable form of crime, particularly prevalent in lower- and middle-income nations such as Nigeria. She highlighted outcomes including ineffective treatments, increased antibiotic resistance, and fatalities, which drive NAFDAC’s ongoing efforts towards implementing stricter regulations.


 "The existence of substandard and falsified medicines erodes public confidence in healthcare systems, deteriorates health outcomes, and promotes the engagement of organized criminal networks which view pharmaceutical counterfeiting as a lower-risk activity compared to drug trafficking," she stated.


 The CRIA program, presently active in India and China, serves as NAFDAC's primary effort against counterfeits with the objective of guaranteeing that solely goods meeting safety, quality, and regulatory criteria can be imported into Nigeria. After conducting an extensive evaluation following his appointment, Professor Adeyeye revamped the program, resulting in the dismissal of one agent, extension contracts for two others, and the introduction of fresh CRIA collaborators.


 Following the recent addition of Cotecna Inspection Services (CIS), the number of CRIA agents has increased to five in India and four in China.


 CRIA Agents in India include Assurance Analytics Pvt. Ltd.; Cotecna Inspection Services; QCS Labs LLP; Quntrol Labs Pvt. Ltd.; and Silis Labs Pvt. Ltd.


 CRIA Representatives in China: China Standards Technical Services Ltd (CSTS), Guangzhou Test Technology Consulting Company Limited, NHU Labs, and Shanghai Hanlin Laboratory Ltd


 CRIA agents are tasked with conducting physical inspections, performing random product sampling, verifying regulatory documents, and carrying out laboratory tests exclusively at NAFDAC-approved facilities.


 Prof. Adeyeye emphasized, "All NAFDAC-regulated products necessitate CRIA processing unless explicitly exempted." He further encouraged exporters and importers to collaborate solely with authorized agents and follow all established protocols meticulously.


 She revealed that NAFDAC has implemented the Ports Inspection Data Capture and Risk Management System (PIDCARMS) to digitize verification of inspection reports and enhance transparency.


 During the meeting, Mrs. Lena Sodergren, who serves as the Vice President of Verification of Conformity and leads operations in Africa at Cotecna, praised NAFDAC’s CRIA initiative. She referred to it as "the most extensive regulatory framework for food, pharmaceuticals, and cosmetics across Africa and further regions."


 "Our partnership with NAFDAC underscores our joint dedication to maintaining high standards of product quality and streamlining global commerce. What sets this initiative apart is its focus on traceability and its capability to remove counterfeit documents, non-conforming cargo, and banned items," she explained further.


 Dr. Olakunle Olaniran, who leads the Ports Inspection Directorate (PID), disclosed that around 200 shipments of counterfeit or inferior goods have been stopped under the CRIA initiative during the last half-decade.


 This encompasses shipments featuring tampered documentation, unsuccessful laboratory examinations, modified label information, or those trying to bypass CRIA scrutiny entirely.


 "In every one of these instances, suitable penalties have been imposed. We will keep enhancing our oversight through collaboration with international authorities and regulatory bodies," stated Olaniran.


 Professor Adeyeye suggested an upcoming partnership with the Indian government aimed at preventing drugs refused at their source from being smuggled illicitly into Nigeria.


 "We aim to monitor the fate of medications that were denied approval in India. It is crucial to have accountability, and we are striving to stop unprincipled individuals from diverting these shipments into Nigeria via an informal route," she cautioned.


 She reaffirmed the organization’s dedication to protecting public health and appealed to all parties involved to back the CRIA initiative in guaranteeing that only top-notch, secure, and efficient goods reach Nigeria’s controlled marketplaces.

Provided by Syndigate Media Inc. (
Syndigate.info
).

NAFDAC Intensifies War on Fake Medicines, Appoints Global Inspector to Bolster CRIA Program

ABUJA The National Agency for Food and Drug Administration and Control (NAFDAC) has intensified its campaign against the entry of su...

Trump Exempts Dozens of Coal Plants From Stricter Pollution Rules

DIWIDA.NEWS government, government regulations, laws and regulations, news, regulation

<img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/image/AA1Cyyqf" data-reference="image" src="https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1Cyyqf.jpg"/>

 On Tuesday, President Trump exempted numerous coal plants from a regulation introduced under Biden that imposed
 stricter standards
 For mercury, lead, nickel, and arsenic emissions.


 Trump declared the exemption as part of multiple measures he implemented to support the coal sector.


 "As part of our significant deregulation initiatives, today afternoon, I am also providing instant assistance to 47 companies managing 66 large-scale coal plants spread across the nation," he stated.


 He stated that the limitations imposed during the Biden administration made it "practically impossible to undertake any actions related, quite frankly, to energy."


 Contact with these contaminants increases the likelihood of developmental delays in kids, along with raising the risks of heart attacks and cancers.


 The action follows the EPA’s temporary
 set up an email platform for those who pollute
 to seek presidential waivers from multiple regulations that it
 plans to roll back.


 Furthermore, the Trump administration committed to utilizing the Justice Department to target states with regulations or practices that restrict coal production and hinder their implementation.


 A directive from an executive order instructs the attorney general to focus on legislation associated with climate change, environmental, social, and governance issues, environmental equity, reduction of greenhouse gases, as well as statutes that enforce carbon levies or sanctions.


 "I'm directing the Department of Justice to pinpoint and combat all unconstitutional state or local regulations that are causing our coal miners to lose their jobs," Trump stated.


 The
 other steps the Trump administration implemented to support coal
 incorporate attempts to exempt coal mining projects from environmental assessments, eliminate limitations on coal mining on federal territories, and mandate the Department of Energy to utilize funds for advancing coal technologies.


 Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This content must not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or distributed without permission.


 To stay updated with the newest information, check out the weather reports, sports updates, and live streams at FOX 2.

Trump Exempts Dozens of Coal Plants From Stricter Pollution Rules

On Tuesday, President Trump exempted numerous coal plants from a regulation introduced under Biden that imposed stricter standards For ...

Silver Lining Emerges as Malaysia Navigates US Tariffs

DIWIDA.NEWS business, economics, government regulations, international economics, international trade

PETALLING JAYA: While the US imposing tariffs may seem gloomy, it actually presents an opportunity for our country, according to various trade associations.
 
 
 The President of the Federation of Malaysian Manufacturers, Tan Sri Soh Thian Lai, stated that although the 24% tariff imposed on Malaysia is far from perfect, it offers certain strategic benefits when compared with neighboring countries.
 
 
 numerous ASEAN nations such as Vietnam, Cambodia, and Laos along with China are encountering substantially increased bilateral US tariffs, with some approaching twice the rate imposed on Malaysia.
 
 
 This change effectively flattens the competition landscape and places Malaysia in a more appealing position for exports, particularly for purchasers looking to move away from pricier nations.
 
 
 "We can leverage this competitive edge to grab a portion of the U.S. market in specific product segments," he stated upon being reached for comment.
 
 
 Although sectors such as semiconductors and pharmaceuticals are not subject to the tariff increase, Soh mentioned that other industries could still see advantages.
 
 
 They encompass items such as rubber gloves, electronic gadgets, packaged foods, aviation parts, furniture, and medical equipment.
 
 
 "These sectors are areas where Malaysia has demonstrated expertise, and where rival suppliers from China or Vietnam currently encounter increased tariff obstacles," he stated.
 
 
 Soh observed that Malaysia's robust manufacturing capabilities, varied supply chain network, and credible regulations could establish the country as a dependable alternative within global supply chains catering to the U.S. market.
 
 
 <img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/image/AA1CmYGY" data-reference="image" src="https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1CmYGY.jpg"/>
 
 
 The Associated Chinese Chambers of Commerce and Industry Malaysia Treasurer-General, Datuk Koong Lin Loong, stated that imposing elevated tariffs on other countries within the Southeast Asian region might result in substantial long-term benefits for Malaysia.
 
 
 The bright side we should focus on is the possibility of turning Malaysia into a key regional investment center.
 
 
 "Investors prefer putting their money here over countries like China and Vietnam, where they faced heavier tariffs," he stated.
 
 
 He mentioned that the country's attractiveness as an investment destination was enhanced because of its robust economy, consistent governmental policies, and capable workforce.
 
 
 These are key elements that investors take into account.
 
 
 “Although the US tariffs on the Philippines (17%) and Singapore (10%) are lower than Malaysia, investors may find policies in the Philippines not so conducive while Singapore may be too expensive for them to set up operations,” he said.
 
 
 Koong mentioned that the strengthening of the ringgit against the US dollar can be attributed to robust economic indicators within the country and the currency being considered undervalued.
 
 
 Given the imposed tariffs, fund managers view the currency’s potential.
 
 
 "Additionally, our stock market has stayed above the 1,500 level, unlike some others that experienced significant drops," he noted.
 
 
 The President of the SME Association of Malaysia, Chin Chee Seong, stated that these tariffs will affect certain areas but primarily target particular high-tech and premium petroleum goods rather than across all sectors like in various other nations within the Asia-Pacific area.
 
 
 Relative to several nations like Laos, Cambodia, Vietnam, and China, our situation remains comparatively more favorable.
 
 
 We primarily export advanced technology goods and premium petroleum products, constituting the major portion of our transactions with the United States; concurrently, we maintain a comparatively modest trade imbalance.
 
 
 "We are in a more favorable situation since items like semiconductors are not subject to tariffs. Therefore, we will probably face only a 10% tariff on most of our other exported goods," he stated when reached for comment.
 
 
 Chin observed that Malaysia was heading in the correct direction by avoiding retaliatory actions towards the United States and choosing instead to pursue a policy of friendly interaction.
 
 
 He thought that US President Donald Trump might experience another phase of tariff modifications because of the criticism he is receiving from various nations as well as within his own country.
 
 
 The co-chairman of the Asean-India Business Council, Nivas Ragavan, noted that Malaysia avoided increased tariffs thanks to its equitable trading relationship with the United States, especially in critical sectors like electrical and electronic products, medical equipment, and precise components which demand stringent compliance standards.
 
 
 "These sectors are closely intertwined with U.S. supply chains and follow international regulatory standards, which might have led the United States to apply a lesser tariff rate than other regional exporters who have distinct trade profiles," he explained.
 
 
 Nivas, who also serves as the vice-chairman of the Federation of Malaysian Businesses Association, stated that reducing tariffs for Malaysia would offer the country a stronger competitive edge.
 
 
 Many of our ASEAN neighbors now encounter higher expenses when exporting goods to the United States.
 
 
 "This might steer specific American purchasers and investors towards Malaysia, notably within areas such as manufacturing, electronics, and medical equipment," he stated.
 
 
 He mentioned that the nation could utilize its current free trade pacts and business-conducive atmosphere to draw in shifts in supply chains from nations with higher tariffs.
 
 
 "There's an opening here for Malaysian exporters to seize, innovate, and take over the space vacated by their regional rivals," he noted.
 
 
 As for the ringgit’s recent appreciation, Nivas said that this could be due to the volatility of the US economy due to inflationary pressure.
 
 
 "In the Malaysian context, persistent trade surpluses, higher commodity prices especially for palm oil and energy, along with a gradual rebound in local consumption, are bolstering faith in the ringgit," he further stated.
 
 
 The advisor of Bumiputera Retailers Organization Malaysia, Datuk Ameer Ali Mydin, stated that products brought in from nations facing increased tariffs might ultimately be sold in this country for less money.
 
 
 This is because companies in those impacted nations might produce more than needed domestically as a result of increased taxes on exports to the United States.
 
 
 "Nevertheless, we need to be cautious about avoiding dumping from these nations, which is currently occurring via e-commerce platforms and could impact our retail industry," he stated.

Silver Lining Emerges as Malaysia Navigates US Tariffs

PETALLING JAYA: While the US imposing tariffs may seem gloomy, it actually presents an opportunity for our country, according to variou...

Kahariri, Haji Slogan Order Erodes Constitutional Integrity

DIWIDA.NEWS government, government regulations, politics, politics and government, politics and law

Selfish Legislators • How can Members of Parliament defend their recent raise of KES 360,000 when intern doctors aren’t receiving their agreed-upon wages because "there are insufficient funds"? queries Ruth Gituma. She questions why none of the politicians seem bothered enough to speak out about this issue publicly. This raises doubts as to whether these officials prioritize nothing beyond personal gain." For correspondence reach her at rgitum@gmail.com.
Inconsistency • The very commission that sanctioned a wage hike worth KES 360,000 for parliamentarians, senators, and women representatives advised public sector workers like educators and medical professionals not to anticipate increases anytime soon," states Eliab Otiato. "Such practices suggest a double standard; treating everyone equally yet privileging certain groups over others?" You may get in touch with him via mabwaeliab@gmail.com.
Political Reflections • The successful presidency of Ibrahim Traoré underscores issues within democratic systems throughout Africa,” asserts Newton Tonui. “Traoré’s achievements under authoritarian rule contrast sharply with those claimed by several democratically chosen African heads-of-state.” Interested parties should direct communications to newtoniu.kl@gmail.com.
Authoritarianism Concerns • Chiefs of Defense Forces Charles Kahereri and Intelligence Director Noordin Haji discouraged citizens from voicing discontent through slogans such as 'Ruto Must Go,' thereby violating fundamental rights regarding free speech according to Edwin Wagara. Their directive seems reminiscent of autocratic governance methods rather than upholding constitutionally protected freedoms." Contact information for Mr. Wagara is available at edwinwagara@gmail.com.
Unresolved Puzzle • What insights does Carol Maina seek into potential irregularities surrounding Kenya’s eCitizen payment system? According to Ms. Maina, confusion reigns supreme concerning management responsibilities for online transactions particularly during hospital visits where additional fees apply without clear justification. Additionally, ease of use remains questionable despite frequent utilization attempts." Those wishing to communicate directly might send emails addressed to carshima2000@yahoo.com.
Have an informative evening!
Provided courtesy of Syndigate.Media Inc.
Syndigate.info
).

Kahariri, Haji Slogan Order Erodes Constitutional Integrity

Selfish Legislators • How can Members of Parliament defend their recent raise of KES 360,000 when intern doctors aren’t receiving their agre...

New Driving Laws Take Effect Today — Here’s What You Need to Know or Face Fines

DIWIDA.NEWS car safety, driving, government regulations, laws and regulations, traffic laws

Michigan’s updated car seat regulations, designed to
 improving child safety
 , comes into force today—imposing penalties for non-compliant drivers.


 The revised regulations pertain to kids aged 13 and younger, mandating more stringent seating provisions according to their age and dimensions.


 Babies under two years of age require a rear-facing car seat for safety, with this configuration permitted in the front seat solely when the airbag has been turned off.


 After turning two years old, they will need to use a forward-facing car seat until reaching the age of five.


 Children aged five to eight should use a belt-positioning booster seat along with both a lap and shoulder strap.


 Once they turn eight years old, they can stop using the booster seat unless their height or weight deems itunsafe.


 Children who reach almost five feet in height before they turn eight years old can bypass using a booster seat.


 Motorists who do not comply with the updated regulations will be subject to a $65 penalty, which comprises a $25 civil fine, court expenses, and a $40 charge for the justice system.

<img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/image/AA1CbmUj" data-reference="image" src="https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1CbmUj.jpg"/>
<img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/image/AA1Cbe53" data-reference="image" src="https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1Cbe53.jpg"/>
<div class="art-ins mol-factbox money">
 
 
 
 New 2025 Driving Laws
 
 
 
 
 <div class="ins cleared mol-factbox-body">
 <ul class="mol-bullets-with-font">
 <li class="">
 A legislation in California bans drivers from parking their vehicles within 20 feet of any crosswalk.
 </li>
 <li>
 Tougher sanctions for street racing in California
 </li>
 <li>
 Updates to Car Seat Age and Weight Guidelines in Colorado
 </li>
 <li class="">
 Penalties for not adhering to specified entry and exit points for express lanes in Colorado
 </li>
 <li>
 Prohibitions against using handheld devices when driving in Colorado and Missouri
 </li>
 <li>
 In Illinois, drivers are permitted to carry a digital version of their license on their smartphones.
 </li>
 <li>
 Give priority to emergency vehicles when driving in Illinois.
 </li>
 <li>
 Drivers in Kentucky must undergo a vision test when they apply to renew their driver’s license.
 </li>
 <li>
 Oregon school bus safety legislation
 </li>
 <li class="">
 Vehicle safety checks eliminated in Texas
 </li>
 </ul>
 </div>
 
</div>

 The legislators introduced these new regulations because automobile accidents represent the leading cause of death among young children in Michigan.


 'During the previous twenty years, Michigan saw an increase in the usage of Child Restraint Devices for children under 4 years old, rising from 74.5 percent in 1997 to 98.2 percent in 2018.'
 Michigan Department of Highway Safety Planning
 said in 2022.


 Despite these improvements, 61 percent of children under 4 years old who died in vehicle collisions in Michigan between 2017 and 2021 were not secured in a rear- or forward-facing child restraint device.


 The Michigan State Police think these laws might reduce the risk of death by as much as 50 percent.


 The new regulations have also been introduced following the turmoil across the US due to the approaching deadline.
 get a Real ID for traveling
 .


 The Department of Homeland Security verified
 passengers boarding domestic flights
 Without a passport, you'll require a government-issued ID by May 7.


 The significant demand led DMVs across states like New Jersey and Tennessee to extend their operational hours to better serve individuals requiring these IDs.

Read more

New Driving Laws Take Effect Today — Here’s What You Need to Know or Face Fines

Michigan’s updated car seat regulations, designed to improving child safety , comes into force today—imposing penalties for non-complian...

Farmers Stunned as USDA Proposes Axing DEI From Energy Projects

DIWIDA.NEWS agriculture, environmental science, government, government regulations, rural development

<img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/image/AA1Ca0Kb" data-reference="image" src="https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1Ca0Kb.jpg"/>

 The Department of Agriculture has an announcement for farmers.
 owed federal grant money
 Think about removing "counterproductive DEIA" elements from your initiatives to receive funding more quickly.


 The department informed those farmers in a letter sent last week that they would start handling the delayed payments after thirty days. However, they are initially urging the farmers to modify their energy initiatives, like setting up solar panels or enhancing ventilation systems, so as to eliminate diversity elements or implement other changes that more closely match President Donald Trump’s objectives.


 "When I received that, I sent it to my USDA representative and asked, 'What on earth does this mean?'" said Michael Protas, who was granted money to put up solar panels on his farm in Dickerson, Maryland.


 The interruption of three rural energy initiatives, which were halted by the Trump administration in January, has stranded farmers and led to a federal lawsuit. According to a letter from the USDA sent out last week, they will start releasing the delayed funds, ensuring that all recipients will ultimately get their allocated money.


 The department distributed an optional web-based questionnaire to impacted farmers, encouraging them to suggest modifications within thirty days. Participants completing this survey—whether agreeing with proposed adjustments or indicating they wouldn’t change their plans—would see their financial support expedited upon review and acceptance of suggested alterations as per the department’s guidelines. Conversely, individuals failing to respond shall experience a one-month delay before the department initiates the disbursement process for their grants.


 Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins stated that the department was making adjustments following the Inflation Reduction Act, which is associated with President Joe Biden.
 key climate and healthcare legislation
 , “delivered more bureaucracy than benefits for rural families.”


 But farmers said the announcement created only more confusion and another hurdle to receive funding they desperately need to pay off loans and replenish money already spent on projects. Some reported finally receiving their payments this week without having altered their projects. Others said that they feared their contracts with the USDA would be voided if they responded to the survey in the wrong way and that they weren’t sure what changes the Agriculture Department is looking for.


 “DEI has nothing to do with solar panels,” Protas said. “I don’t know what they’re asking for.”


 The Agriculture Department declined to answer questions from The Washington Post about what changes to remove diversity, equity, inclusion and accessibility from rural energy projects could entail.


 The funding embargo began on Trump’s inaugural day as he signed an order.
 executive order
 To hold back millions of dollars in funds pledged to farmers from past years aimed at promoting sustainable and energy-efficient farming methods. Numerous agreements included compensating farmers for their costs; however, the delay in payments placed these financial burdens squarely on them.


 On March 13, multiple farmers along with nonprofit organizations
 sued
 The Agriculture Department is being accused of improperly holding back funds that Congress had allocated. (According to Hana Vizcarra, an attorney with Earthjustice, one plaintiff in the lawsuit was granted funding on Monday. The Agriculture Department has not responded to inquiries from The Post regarding the lawsuit.)


 “They expect the government just to fulfill their obligations,” Vizcarra said. “And instead, as the new administration came in, they just froze all the funds and disrupted work that was already ongoing and put everything at risk.”


 The request for farmers to complete a survey and consider changing their projects came as another frustrating curveball to those who have waited months for their money under the Empowering Rural America (New ERA), Powering Affordable Clean Energy (PACE) and Rural Energy for America (REAP) programs.


 “It just adds more confusion,” said Protas, who took out a roughly $97,000 loan to install solar panels on his farm. A REAP grant was supposed to cover about half the amount.


 The Agriculture Department’s letter said that, besides removing diversity features, project revisions could include using “more affordable and effective energy sources” and implementing changes to increase “production, transportation, refining and generation capacity of energy and critical minerals.”


 The department had earlier taken pride in rejecting grants aimed at promoting diversity programs. In a March social media post, Rollins mentioned that she terminated a $397,000 grant to a California-based non-profit organization running a training initiative for aspiring farmers. She stated this program was focused on teaching "queer, trans, and BIPOC urban farmers and consumers about food justice," as reported by Civil Eats.
 reported
 .


 Earthjustice
 called
 The announcement was labeled as a "stunt" and the department was accused of fabricating an excuse to withhold funds from farmers who refuse to alter their programs. Vizcarra also mentioned that farmers supported through various other USDA initiatives continue to be without the financial assistance they were expecting.


 This simply seems like an extra obstacle we have to overcome," she stated. "There’s no reason for them to further complicate things for those who received grants by making them wonder if they must use specific phrases to obtain funds that the government has already committed to giving.


 Travis Forgues, who operates a dairy farm in Westby, Wisconsin, along with his spouse, Amy, mentioned that he anticipates receiving approximately a $55,000 REAP grant to assist with the cost of installing solar panels. Last week, the pair completed the USDA’s questionnaire and stated they wouldn’t be altering their plans for the project.


 I hope we haven't made an error here," Forgues stated. "When discussing topics like solar power or energy autonomy, this isn't really related to diversity, equity, and inclusion issues. To be honest, even if it were tied to those matters, I wouldn't consider it significant.


 David Funk manages an energy consultancy firm that offers services funded by REAP for farmers in Idaho and nearby regions like Washington. Last week, he submitted a declaration stating that he wouldn’t alter his program’s operations and recommended his farming clientele follow suit. Although he got paid on Monday evening, several of the farmers collaborating with him have yet to receive their funds.


 Funk stated that he appreciated the Agriculture Department’s commitment to providing compensation to recipients at last. However, he also noted that it seemed inefficient for the government to subject farmers to such prolonged ambiguity before reinstating their access to financial resources.


 "They have harmed numerous businesses and undermined the reliability of the government in their pursuit to eliminate DEI from things that do not actually possess it," Funk stated.

Farmers Stunned as USDA Proposes Axing DEI From Energy Projects

The Department of Agriculture has an announcement for farmers. owed federal grant money Think about removing "counterproductive DE...

CBP Collects Over $200M Daily in 'Liberation Day' Tariffs as Collections Kick In

DIWIDA.NEWS border security, economics, government regulations, international economics, u.s. customs and border protection

<img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/video/AA1Cn2Nd" data-reference="video"/>
 
 The U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) is currently amassing more than $200 million daily in additional funds due to the enforcement of extensive new tariff measures.
 President Donald Trump
 's "Liberation Day" plan.
 
 
 “During this administration, CBP has effectively carried out 13 tariff-related executive orders,” stated a CBP representative to FOX Business. “Operating at the forefront of our nation, CBP rigorously upholds all regulations and presidential instructions to protect our country’s economic autonomy.”
 
 
 Leveraging authorities granted through the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 and the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), the Trump administration has set its sights on products originating from numerous nations, with China being one of them.
 
 
 On April 3, the U.S. introduced a 25% tariff on all imported passenger cars and light trucks from every nation, followed by an additional 10% tariff on Saturday.
 global tariff took effect
 Under the IEEPA, CBP stated, with some exceptions.
 
 
 
 TRUMP'S CHINA TARIFS ARE FACING A LEGAL CHALLENGE FROM A CONSERVATIVE ORGANIZATION THAT DEEMS THEM 'ILLEGAL.'
 
 
 <img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/image/AA1Cb6Hi" data-reference="image" src="https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1Cb6Hi.jpg"/>
 
 Starting April 9, 86 nations will encounter new reciprocal tariffs that range between 11% and 50%, though certain exceptions apply. Additionally, as of May 2, items originating from China and Hong Kong with an individual value not exceeding $800, which are sent through channels beyond the international postal service, will lose their eligibility for exemption from duties and must instead pay regular rates, as stated by CBP.
 
 
 
 REVIEW ON THE FOX BUSINESS APPLICATION
 
 
 
 In the meantime, beginning in May, postal deliveries originating from China and Hong Kong will be subject to a duty of either 30% or $25 per item, with the higher amount being applied. This tariff will rise to $50 per item effective June 1st.
 
 
 
 THE SENATOR ATTEMPTS TO SABOTAGE THE CRUCIAL TRUMP BUDGET PROCESS BY CHALLENGING TARIFFESESQUE
 
 
 <img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/image/AA1Cb25L" data-reference="image" src="https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1Cb25L.jpg"/>
 
 CBP says it’s working closely with other agencies to roll out these changes and will keep the trade community updated through its online messaging system.
 
 
 The agency has already generated billions of dollars in revenue.
 earlier Trump executive orders
 .
 
 
 This encompasses $4.8 billion under EO 14195, which aims at
 synthetic opioids from China
 ; $861 million allocated through Executive Order 14193, designed to halt drug trafficking from Canada; more than $2 billion set aside via Executive Order 14194, tackling trade problems along the southern border; and $1 billion gathered from tariffs imposed on steel and aluminum under Section 232.
 
 <img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/image/AA1CfyS8" data-reference="image" src="https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1CfyS8.jpg"/>
 
 The CBP is ideally situated to put into action and enforce the President's tariffs," stated the CBP representative. "We have all necessary resources and are prepared to gather the due duties.
 
 
 Tariff rates for particular items can be located in the
 Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States
 .
 S.
 


 
 Original article source:
 CBP is already gathering 'Liberation Day' tariffs, generating more than $200 million daily in extra income.

CBP Collects Over $200M Daily in 'Liberation Day' Tariffs as Collections Kick In

The U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) is currently amassing more than $200 million daily in additional funds due to the enforc...

CBP Collects Over $200M Daily in 'Liberation Day' Tariffs

DIWIDA.NEWS border security, economics, government regulations, international economics, u.s. customs and border protection

<img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/video/AA1Cn2Nd" data-reference="video"/>
 
 The U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) is currently amassing more than $200 million daily in additional funds due to the enforcement of extensive new tariff measures.
 President Donald Trump
 's "Liberation Day" plan.
 
 
 “During this administration, CBP has effectively carried out 13 tariff-related executive orders,” stated a CBP representative to FOX Business. “As the front line of defense for our country, CBP rigorously upholds all statutes and presidential instructions to protect our nation’s economic autonomy.”
 
 
 Leveraging authorities granted by the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 and the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), the Trump administration has set its sights on products originating from numerous nations such as China.
 
 
 On April 3rd, the U.S. implemented a 25% tariff on all imported passenger cars and light trucks from every nation, followed by an additional 10% tariff on Saturday.
 global tariff took effect
 under IEEPA, with certain exclusions, CBP said.
 
 
 
 TRUMP’S CHINA TARIFFS FACE LEGAL CHALLENGE FROM CONSERVATIVE GROUP CALLING THEM ‘UNLAWFUL'
 
 
 <img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/image/AA1Cb6Hi" data-reference="image" src="https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1Cb6Hi.jpg"/>
 
 Beginning April 9, 86 countries will face new reciprocal tariffs ranging from 11% to 50%, with some exclusions, and on May 2, products from China and Hong Kong valued at or under $800 and shipped outside the international postal system will no longer be eligible for duty-free treatment and will be subject to standard duties, according to CBP.
 
 
 
 READ ON THE FOX BUSINESS APP
 
 
 
 In the meantime, beginning in May, postal deliveries originating from China and Hong Kong will be subject to a duty of either 30% or $25 per item, with the higher amount being applied. The charge will then go up to $50 per item effective June 1st.
 
 
 
 THE SENATOR ATTEMPTS TO INTERRUPT THE CRUCIAL TRUMP BUDGET PROCESS BY QUESTIONING TARIFFESESQUE MEASURES
 
 
 <img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/image/AA1Cb25L" data-reference="image" src="https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1Cb25L.jpg"/>
 
 The CBP mentions that they are collaborating intensively with various agencies to implement these modifications and will maintain communication with the trading community via their online messaging platform.
 
 
 The agency has already generated billions of dollars.
 earlier Trump executive orders
 .
 
 
 That includes $4.8 billion under EO 14195, which targets
 synthetic opioids from China
 ; $861 million allocated through Executive Order 14193, designed to prevent drug trafficking from Canada; more than $2 billion provided via Executive Order 14194, tackling trade problems along the southern border; and $1 billion gathered from tariffs imposed on steel and aluminum under Section 232.
 
 <img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/image/AA1CfyS8" data-reference="image" src="https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1CfyS8.jpg"/>
 
 The CBP is ideally situated to carry out and enforce the President's tariffs," stated the CBP spokesperson. "We have all necessary resources and are prepared to gather the due duties.
 
 
 Tariff rates for particular items can be located in the
 Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States
 .
 S.
 


 
 Original article source:
 CBP is already gathering 'Liberation Day' duties, generating more than $200 million daily in extra income.

CBP Collects Over $200M Daily in 'Liberation Day' Tariffs

The U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) is currently amassing more than $200 million daily in additional funds due to the enforc...

Doge Senator Tells Outdoor Group to 'Go Fish' After Uncovering Grant Tied to Excessive Salaries

DIWIDA.NEWS government, government regulations, politics, politics and government, sports

<img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/video/AA1BNipa" data-reference="video"/>
 
 
 EXCLUSIVE:
 
 A
 top DOGE leader
 In the Senate, efforts are underway to secure a substantial federal grant from a non-profit dedicated to advancing fishing, boating, and outdoor activities. The concern raised is that these funds might be misused for inflating executive compensation, an assertion the organization denies.
 
 
 Sen. Joni Ernst
 , from R-Iowa, along with her team, has been examining federal grants for signs of waste, fraud, or misuse of public money. They discovered a $27 million grant awarded to the Recreational Boating and Fishing Foundation.
 RBFF
 ).
 
 
 Over $26 million from the grant had already been distributed, and looking at the longer timeframe, RBFF has received $164 million in total funding since 2012, including almost $13 million that was allocated for this year in 2024.
 
 
 From the government website
 USA Spending
 The aim of the grant emphasizes RBFF’s "Take Me Fishing" public initiative, which encompasses elements such as social and digital media engagement, advertisements on Walt Disney Company-owned streaming platforms, and “portable fishing stations” designed for urban areas and underrepresented groups.
 
 
 
 DOGE MADNESS: SETUP FOR THE SWEET 16 BRACKET FEATURING THE MOST BIZARRE FEDERAL EXPENSES VIE FOR THE TITLE
 
 
 <img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/video/AA1BNipg" data-reference="video"/>
 
 The Disney deal is valued at $1.99 million, and
 other expenditures
 encompassed $204,000 for SEO consultancy, $5 million with a Minnesota-based agency for media, creative development, and design services, and $189,000 to a hotel in Atlanta.
 
 
 
 REVIEW ON THE FOX NEWS APPLICATION
 
 
 
 The non-profit organization based in Alexandria, Virginia, reported six-figure salaries for multiple senior executives, amounting to over $1.5 million collectively. It is said that the group’s president receives an annual salary of around $318,000. Many of the remaining key personnel earn salaries ranging from the high hundred thousands.
 
 
 Nevertheless, representatives from RBFF asserted their stance in a declaration to Fox News Digital, maintaining that public monies are being utilized appropriately.
 
 
 "The RBFF boasts a strong legacy of drawing Americans to the activities of fishing and boating," the statement said.
 
 
 
 DOGECOIN-CAUCUS Senator Advocates for Termination of Slush Fund for Presidential Aspirants
 
 
 <img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/image/AA1BNrnm" data-reference="image" src="https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1BNrnm.jpg"/>
 
 Over the last decade, substantial growth in engagement has led to direct advantages for independent enterprises, producers, and nearby neighborhoods through heightened expenditures.
 
 
 RBFF stated that American fishermen generate approximately $150 billion in economic impact and support about 1 million jobs across the country.
 
 
 The organization stated that 'in reality, we understand that each fisher contributes $1,500 annually to commercial activities, a statistic that stimulates economic action across all states within the federation.'
 
 
 All of our funding comes from a competitive grant provided by the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service through the Sport Fish Restoration excise tax. Our organization receives support from state fish and wildlife agencies along with industry manufacturers and retailers spanning from Alaska to Florida.
 
 <img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/video/AA1AYVHA" data-reference="video"/>
 
 Ernst remained unconvinced and told Fox News Digital, “Washington completely fell for enriching pricey recreational consultants.”
 
 
 She joked that "special interests" should instead be advised to "take a hike."
 
 
 The Department of Interior should reclaim the leftover $650,000 and inform these consultants that they can look elsewhere for opportunities.
 
 
 Fox News Digital additionally contacted the Interior Department seeking further comments regarding the grant, which was issued before the current administration took charge.
 


 
 Original article source:
 Dogecoin senator advises outdoor organization to 'take a hike' following discovery of substantial grants linked to elevated compensation.

Doge Senator Tells Outdoor Group to 'Go Fish' After Uncovering Grant Tied to Excessive Salaries

EXCLUSIVE: A top DOGE leader In the Senate, efforts are underway to secure a substantial federal grant from a non-profit...

Klarifikasi Kurang Jelas: Peninjauan atas Mekanisme Kerja dan Pengawasan Satuan Tugas Transisi Energi

DIWIDA.NEWS business, energy sector, government, government regulations, politics and government

<img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/image/AA1C7QN9" data-reference="image" src="https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1C7QN9.jpg"/>

 
 
 DIWIDA
 
 
 ,
 
 
 Jakarta
 
 
 - Pemerintah mendirikan Satuan Tugas atau
 
 Satgas Transisi Energi
 
 Dan Ekonomi Hijau untuk mengejar tujuan penurunan emisi. Akan tetapi, keefektifannya diragukan akibat kurangnya data tentang cara kerjanya serta pemantauan yang memadai.


 Ahli Penelitian tentang Kebijakan Energi dan Perubahan Iklim dari Grup Ilmiah
 TransisiEnergiBerkeadilan.id
 Wira Dillon merasakan ada banyak hal yang belum terang tentang satgas tersebut. Ia hanya dapat menebak-nebak bahwa satgas akan berfungsi sebagai 'tempat' lanjutan.
 
 JETP
 
 (Kerjasama Transisi Energi yang Lebih Berkelanjutan) di Indonesia.


 "JETP Indonesia mungkin harus
 downsizing
 Sekretariat tersebut dibentuk pada pertengahan tahun ini terkait dengan penarikan Amerika Serikat dari JETP Indonesia," ujar Wira saat diwawancara oleh Tempo, Selasa, 2 April 2025.


 Wira menggarisbawahi kebutuhan adanya proses pengawasan yang lebih transparan. Menurut pandangannya, partisipasi masyarakat dalam sekretariat JETP Indonesia sampai saat ini belum optimal dan kurang mempunyai sistem untuk menyampaikan saran atau kritik dengan efektif. Harapannya, tim tugas tersebut akan memiliki ketentuan yang jelas tentang hal itu.
 oversight
 dari aspek publik yang lebih terang.


 Selain itu, dia mengira bahwa tim tugas khusus dibuat untuk membantu dalam pencairan dana peralihan energi serta konstruksi lingkungan yang berkelanjutan, termasuk perdagangan emisi. Namun, rincian besar dari rencananya masih kabur, katanya lagi. Menurut informasi yang mereka miliki hingga saat ini, sepertinya mayoritas upaya tetap difokuskan pada JETP dan Rencana Investasi dan Kebijakan Lengkap (CIPP).


 Wira juga menggarisbawahi bahwa keberhasilan dari tim tugas ini sangat tergantung pada hubungan yang baik dengan Badan Pengelola Investasi Dana Antarabangsa. "Jika tim tugas ini dirancang tanpa mempertimbangkan interaksi dengan Dana Antarabangsa, maka saya ragu apakah nanti tim ini akan menjadi hanya formalitas dan respons atas harapan-harapan para penyumbang dalam Program Beralih Energi Terbarukan," katanya.


 Tanpa adanya hubungan yang jelas dengan Danantara, Wira mengungkapkan kekhawatirannya bahwa proyek-proyek yang bertentangan dengan sasaran transisi energi, contohnya proyek Dimethyl Ether (DME), masih akan tetap dilanjutkan. Dia menambahkan meski satgas tersebut dinyatakan menjadi sebagian dari usaha untuk mencapai transisi energi yang lestari.


 Sebelumnya, Menteri Koordinator Bidang Perekonomian Airlangga Hartarto mengumumkan telah mendirikan Satuan Tugas Transisi Energi dan Ekonomi Berkelanjutan guna meraih sasaran peningkatan reduksi emisi. Pendirian tim khusus ini didasari oleh Keputusan Menteri Koordinator Bidang Perekonomian No. 141 Tahun 2025.


 "Indonesia masih mematok penurunan emisi sebanyak 31,89% dengan usaha sendiri, dan bisa mencapai 43% jika menerima dukungan keuangan dari luar negeri, semua itu bertujuan untuk tahun 2030," ungkap Airlangga saat konferensi pers di Kantor Kemenko Kemeri Ekonomi, Jakarta Pusat, Senin, 24 Maret 2025.


 Satuan tugas tersebut dikendalikan oleh badannya dan dirancang dengan empat timkerja. Empat bagian itu adalah Energi Terbarukan dan Penurunan Emisi pada Tahap Awal; Industri Ramah Lingkungan dan Reduksi Emisi pada Tahap Akhir; Kerjasama, Pendanaan, dan Investasi Berkelanjutan; serta Aspek Sosial, Ekonomi, Perlindungan Lingkungan, dan Pembinaan Kemampuan Sumber Daya Manusia.


 
 Ervana Trikarinaputri
 
 berkontribusi dalam tulisan ini.

Klarifikasi Kurang Jelas: Peninjauan atas Mekanisme Kerja dan Pengawasan Satuan Tugas Transisi Energi

DIWIDA , Jakarta - Pemerintah mendirikan Satuan Tugas atau Satgas Transisi Energi Dan Ekonomi Hijau unt...

Cabin Conundrum: Lovebirds Ordered to Demolish Montana Retreat

DIWIDA.NEWS community, controversies, government regulations, laws and regulations, news

In an unexpected turn of events, a federal judge has sided with
 <a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/california/index.html">
 California
 </a>
 a couple engaged in arguments over instructions to demolish their magnificent, partially constructed cabin within
 <a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/montana/index.html">
 Montana
 </a>
 national park, enabling them to maintain the property as it is.


 The partially constructed chasm belonging to John and Stacy Ambler, situated on a 2,300-square-foot plot near McDonald Creek within Glacier National Park,
 <a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14263547/california-couple-petition-save-illegal-home-montana-glacier-national-park.html">
 has faced potential demolition following multiple complaints lodged with the Flathead Conservation District by various residents.
 </a>
 (FCD),
 <a href="https://www.sfgate.com/national-parks/article/groups-fire-back-calif-couple-national-park-home-20242416.php">
 SFGate reported
 </a>
 .


 Following multiple legal disputes, Federal Judge Kathleen DeSoto issued her decision in favor of the San Diego couple in February, stating that the FCD does not have authority over the property since it is situated inside a national park, which places it under federal jurisdiction.


 In the most recent development of this continuing conflict, both the FCD and Friends of Montana Streams and Rivers have lodged an appeal, maintaining that they possess grounds to overturn the judge's ruling.


 'Sflathead Conservation District bears the legal responsibility for safeguarding the natural resources within our district,' said Samantha Tappenbeck, a district resource conservationist, to SFGate.


 Therefore, the Flathead Conservation District Board of Supervisors chose to challenge the decision in order to serve the interests of our district’s residents and due to their belief that several aspects could be appealed.


 The Amblers started constructing their three-story, verdant Montana residence in late 2022 and early 2023. They built a concrete retaining wall along the steambank and set stone foundations into the slope to create a deck.


 Nevertheless, the couple's building endeavor sparked local controversy, with West Glacier area inhabitants complaining that the house could be easily seen by both park visitors and nearby residents.
 <a href="https://flatheadbeacon.com/2025/02/06/federal-judge-rules-in-favor-of-mcdonald-creek-homeowners/">
 Flathead Beacon reported
 </a>
 .

<img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/image/AA1BMYfa" data-reference="image" src="https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1BMYfa.jpg"/>
<img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/image/AA1BN7cU" data-reference="image" src="https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1BN7cU.jpg"/>
<img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/image/AA1BN9Tv" data-reference="image" src="https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1BN9Tv.jpg"/>

 The grievances drew the notice of the FCD, prompting them to conduct an on-site examination at the Ambler residence.


 After the examination, the district asserted that the pair had breached the state's Natural Steambed and Land Preservation Act (NSLPA), commonly referred to as the 310 law.


 They justified their decision because they thought the house had been built unlawfully, lacking all required permissions.


 According to the 310 law, any person or organization undertaking activities that involve altering or modifying the riverbed or nearby banks of a continuously flowing stream must secure the necessary permissions from the local conservation district, as mentioned by The Flathead Beacon.


 Nevertheless, the pair assert that the Flathead County Planning Office granted them approval, stating they had carte blanche to use the land however they wished since it is located in an un-zoned region, as per their information.
 <a href="https://hungryhorsenews.com/news/2025/jan/02/judge-to-hear-arguments-next-week-in-glacier-national-park-house-case/">
 Hungry Horse News
 </a>
 .


 The federal Park Service did permit the Amblers to hook up with the Apgar water and sewage systems.


 Despite this, the District's Board of Supervisors eventually decided that the couple has to demolish their partially constructed house and restore the steambed prior to April 1, 2024.


 Nevertheless, the pair opted to file lawsuits in both state and federal courts, contending that the District had overstepped its bounds.

<img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/image/AA1BN04C" data-reference="image" src="https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1BN04C.jpg"/>
<img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/image/AA1BN5gZ" data-reference="image" src="https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1BN5gZ.jpg"/>
<img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/image/AA1BMYfm" data-reference="image" src="https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1BMYfm.jpg"/>

 The locals from California do not acknowledge the District's authority over their land and assets since it falls within the boundaries of the national park and sits on an inholding—a piece of private property established before the park was created in 1910.


 They assert that the property is part of Apgar, a tiny, privately held community within the park established in 1908.


 The District alleged that the Amblers were attempting to locate the ambiguous zone since they asserted that Montana holds no authority over the property due to its location within a national park, which enjoys federal protection. However, they simultaneously argued that the federal government cannot claim access because the land is considered privately owned.


 Nevertheless, the District asserted that both state and local laws apply to private property, irrespective of its location, even within Glacier National Park.


 However, the couple contended that when they transferred ownership of the land, Montana had ceded jurisdiction to the United States, as stated by their attorney, Trent Baker, according to Hungry Horse News.


 At the heart of the organization's case is the assertion that even though the property is situated inside Glacier National Park, this does not absolve it from complying with Montana’s state regulations, notably the Montana Natural Streambed and Land Protection Act (NSLPA).


 In contrast, the pair contended that the Steambed Act was enacted only in 1976, which means that Montana's state laws were not eligible for federal recognition, as reported by SFGate.


 The couple additionally mentioned that the national park should be responsible for governing private inholdings, asserting that the FCD cannot independently reclaim authority over territories where the state of Montana had previously relinquished control to the United States, as reported by the Flathead Beacon.

<img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/image/AA1BN7d3" data-reference="image" src="https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1BN7d3.jpg"/>
<img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/image/AA1BN7d7" data-reference="image" src="https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1BN7d7.jpg"/>
<img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/image/AA1BNciT" data-reference="image" src="https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1BNciT.jpg"/>
<img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/image/AA1BN7dc" data-reference="image" src="https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1BN7dc.jpg"/>

 The sole concern in this matter pertains to whether federal or state authorities have jurisdiction over the Amblers' estate, as stated by their lawyer, Trent Baker, in the summary judgment, according to the source.


 In DeSoto’s directive, she stated that the arguments exceeded ‘the boundaries set by the single claim presented in the complaint… specifically, that FCD has no authority over the Ambler property, and that the Streambed Act is not applicable.’


 In order for the appeals to continue in court, lawyers from both entities need to file their briefs by May 28.


 Officials from Glacier National Park mentioned earlier that they were collaborating with lawyers from the US Department of the Interior to decide if they would participate in the lawsuit, according to SFGATE.


 "The Amblers" did not promptly reply to SANTIJAYA for commentary.

<a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14543867/california-couple-surprise-development-ordered-demolish-cabin-montana.html">
 Read more
</a>

Cabin Conundrum: Lovebirds Ordered to Demolish Montana Retreat

In an unexpected turn of events, a federal judge has sided with California a couple engaged in arguments over instructions to demol...

Age Limit Bill: Presidential and Government Candidates Face 60-Year Cap as Bill Advances

DIWIDA.NEWS government regulations, news, politics, politics and government, politics and law

The House of Representatives has approved for second reading a bill aimed at prohibiting individuals over 60 years old from contesting for the positions of President and Governor in Nigeria.
 
 
 Should this legislation pass through parliamentary review and be enacted, President Bola Tinubu, ex-Vice President Atiku Abubakar, along with the 2023 Labour Party presidential nominee, Mr Peter Obi, would be ineligible for the 2027 presidential race due to their ages exceeding 60 years.
 
 
 Titled 'An Act to Amend the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 Regarding Qualifications Required for Individuals Elected as President and Vice-President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, Governors and Deputy Governors of States Within the Federation, and Other Connected Issues' was proposed by Imo state legislator Ikenga Ugochinyere.
 
 
 One of the 31 proposed bills that advanced past the second reading stage during Thursday's plenary session was this particular piece of legislation.
 
 
 The legislation states that "To be eligible for the presidency, an individual must have attained a minimum education level of a university degree and should hold a bachelor’s diploma in their selected area of expertise."
 
 
 Section 131 of the Main Act is revised by adding a clause that states, 'He must be under 60 years old when competing for the Presidency.'
 
 
 Section 177(d) of the main legislation is revised by modifying the educational criteria required for individuals to qualify for election as governor as follows:
 
 
 A candidate must have completed their education at least up to the university level and should hold aBachelor's degree in their selected area of study to qualify for the presidential election.
 
 
 That he is less than 60 years old at the time of competing for the position of Governor.
 
 
 A proposed law to grant legislative support for setting up Alvan Ikoku Federal University of Education in Imo State was also advanced to the next stage after passing its second reading.
 
 
 The legislation proposed by Ugochinyere seeks to enhance the stature of the organization by providing it with federal acknowledgment and financial assistance.
 
 
 The House similarly advanced a bill aimed at amending the Constitution to ensure the compulsory involvement of young individuals and those living with disabilities in political positions.
 
 
 This legislation, which has been backed by the Imo legislator, aims to foster inclusivity and representation within government structures.
 
 
 Likewise, the proposal to shift trade and commerce into the concurrent legislative list, designed to boost interstate commerce, also advanced to the next stage during the full assembly session.
 
 
 Once enacted, the suggested bill will grant authority to both federal and state governments to oversee commerce, thereby enhancing economic actions across and between these governmental levels.
 
 
 Additionally, the Federal University of Education, Zaria ( Establishment ) Bill, 2025, proposed by Speaker Abbas and Plateau state representative Yusuf Gagdi, was also reviewed and endorsed.
 
 
 The proposed legislation intends to create a specialized university dedicated to teacher training in Zaria. Additional educational bills encompass the founding of the Yusuf Maitama Sule Federal University of Education in Kano and the University of Nigerian Languages in Aba, along with several others.
 
 
 Also approved at the second reading stage is the Bill for Reserved Seats for Women in National and State Assemblies, 2025, introduced by Rep. Kafilat Ogbara.
 
 
 This legislation seeks to advance gender inclusivity by setting aside particular parliamentary positions exclusively for women.
 
 
 The bill titled "Inclusion of Youth and People with Disabilities in Political Positions," introduced by Ugochinyere, successfully advanced to the next stage after passing its second reading.
 
 
 This legislation seeks to promote increased involvement of underrepresented communities in governmental affairs.
 
 
 Moreover, judicial reforms are also part of the plan, including proposals like the Benjamin Kalu-sponsored Timeframes for Judicial Proceedings Act, 2025, aimed at improving the efficiency of the legal system within the nation.
 
 
 A different proposition, "The Augmentation of Supreme Court & Court of Appeal Judgeships Act," proposed by Bello Kaoje, suggests increasing the number of judges to enhance judicial effectiveness.
 
 
 The House likewise discussed legislation concerning the establishment of new states, where both the Wan State (North Central) Bill, 2025 and the Gobir State (North West) Bill, 2025 advanced to the second reading stage.
 

Provided by SyndiGate Media Inc.
<a href="http://syndigate.info">
 Syndigate.info
</a>
).

Age Limit Bill: Presidential and Government Candidates Face 60-Year Cap as Bill Advances

The House of Representatives has approved for second reading a bill aimed at prohibiting individuals over 60 years old from contesting ...

Amy Coney Barrett Challenges Clarence Thomas on Key Supreme Court Decision

DIWIDA.NEWS government, government regulations, news, politics and government, politics and law

<img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/video/AA1nFEAv" data-reference="video"/>

 Amy Coney Barrett has expressed concerns about a recently proposed tax concept put forth by her colleague.
 Supreme Court
 judge,
 Clarence Thomas
 .

<h2>
 Why It Matters
</h2>

 Conservatives are eager to witness a resurgence of the nondelegation doctrine, which forbids
 Congress
 by transferring its essential lawmaking authority to federal agencies or other unelected officials.


 On March 27, Judge Amy Coney Barrett, nominated by President Trump, voiced significant reservations regarding the reinstatement of this legal principle. The doctrine has not been invoked since the 1930s and might considerably diminish the authority held by federal regulatory bodies.


 It also fits into a broader story regarding Amy Coney Barrett's position on the court, as she does.
 navigates a moderate stance on numerous social matters
 , away from the hard-line conservatism of Thomas.


 DIWIDA
 requested an email response from the Federal Communications Commission on Thursday.

<img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/image/AA1BN6Il" data-reference="image" src="https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1BN6Il.jpg"/>
<h2>
 What To Know
</h2>

 On March 26, the Supreme Court examined the case of
 Federal Communications Commission versus Consumers' Research
 In which it needed to evaluate the legitimacy of an FCC fund requiring communication firms to cover costs associated with installing telephone lines and internet cables in remote and economically underprivileged regions.


 The telecommunications firms subsequently transfer a significant portion of those additional costs to the end user.

<h2>
 Tax Cap
</h2>

 In general terms, Justice Thomas proposed that the non-delegation doctrine might serve as a means to limit how extensively the FCC or similar governmental bodies could amass funds via taxation.


 Barrett argued that imposing a cap wouldn’t work effectively. "Whether it’s $3 trillion or $5 trillion, it’s essentially just tossing around numbers without much purpose," she stated.

<h2>
 "Meaningless Exercise"
</h2>

 She posed several incisive questions to Trent McCotter, the attorney advocating for Consumers' Research, a conservative organization aiming to reduce taxes and eliminate "woke" politics, as stated on their webpage.


 When McCotter informed the court, “Essentially, this case boils down to taxation without representation,” Judge Barrett responded, “That sounds rather empty. It appears to be an insignificant endeavor.”

<h2>
 Supreme Court Clashes
</h2>

 As
 DIWIDA
 previously reported
 Justice Amy Coney Barrett and Justice Thomas have often disagreed in various Supreme Court rulings.


 Barrett expressed significant disagreement with Thomas' analysis during the oral arguments.
 United States v. Rahimi,
 a case determining whether individuals subject to a domestic violence restraining order are permitted to possess firearms.

<h2>
 Gun Control
</h2>

 In June 2024, during the oral arguments, Thomas queried Rahimi's attorney about why a criminal defendant ought to face a civil measure such as a restraining order.


 Coney Barrett swiftly retrieved a copy of the restraining order.
 prohibits Rahimi from approaching his former girlfriend or her daughter.


 She proceeded to read out the allegations listed in the restraining order involving Rahimi's purported acts of threat and intimidation toward his former girlfriend.


 In this way, Coney Barrett indicated her disagreement with Thomas’ strict interpretation of the Second Amendment. Thomas believes that one should consider solely the literal words of the Constitution, implying that American citizens have unrestricted rights to possess firearms.

<h2>
 What People Are Saying
</h2>

 In their plea to the Supreme Court to consider the FCC case,
 
 the former Solicitor General, Elizabeth Prelogar,
 
 When setting up the FCC in 1934, Congress aimed to ensure "that all Americans have access, to the greatest extent feasible, to a swift, effective national and international wired and wireless communications network equipped with sufficient resources at prices that are affordable," as stated in their documentation.


 She stated that the FCC funding aimed at supporting underprivileged areas is aiding in the pursuit of comprehensive communication access.


 On March 26, Boyden Gray & Associates, the legal firm acting for Consumer’s Research, issued a statement alleging that the FCC's fund has been marred by fraud—with millions squandered on lavish items such as luxury condominiums, private aircraft, and country club memberships. Furthermore, the Government Accountability Office reported that despite the expenditure of billions of dollars, there was no discernible increase in phone and internet services.

<h2>
 What Happens Next
</h2>

 The Supreme Court will take several months to deliberate on the case prior to publishing a written judgment. The ruling is expected to be released sometime around late 2024 or early 2025.


 
 Related Articles
 
 <ul>
 <li>
 What Amy Coney Barrett Has Stated About Same-Sex Marriage As Republicans Aim To Restructure Policies
 </li>
 <li>
 Amy Coney Barrett's Family Received Unusual Pizzas at Their Residences
 </li>
 <li>
 How Frequently Does Amy Coney Barrett Diverge From Conservative Judges on the Supreme Court?
 </li>
 <li>
 Donald Trump Supports Amy Coney Barrett Following MAGA Criticisms
 </li>
 </ul>


 Start your unlimited DIWIDAtrial

Amy Coney Barrett Challenges Clarence Thomas on Key Supreme Court Decision

Amy Coney Barrett has expressed concerns about a recently proposed tax concept put forth by her colleague. Supreme Court judge, Claren...

Rwandan Authorities Urge End to NGO Ties With Belgium Amid Church Involvement

DIWIDA.NEWS government, government regulations, laws and regulations, news, politics

The Rwanda Governance Board (RGB), on Thursday, March 27, announced that all international and national NGOs, faith-based organisations, and common-benefit foundations registered and operating in Rwanda, are prohibited from having any kind of cooperation with the Government of Belgium and its affiliated entities. The RGB, which regulates faith-based and civil society organisations said move the move was in line with government’s March 17 decision to sever diplomatic relations with the Kingdom of Belgium, after the European country was accused of acting against Rwanda’s interests and taking sides in the DR Congo crisis. ALSO READ: Kagame warns Belgium against undermining Rwanda’s progress Prohibition of cooperation and partnerships Effective immediately, the RGB public notice indicated that all collaboration, partnerships, and engagements with the Government of Belgium and its affiliated institutions, non-governmental cooperation actors, agencies, and programs are prohibited. “Any ongoing projects or agreements involving these entities and other similarly affiliated entities must be terminated immediately and reported accordingly,” the public notice reads in part. Prohibition of financial transactions The regulator said that no funds, grants, donations, or financial contributions shall be received from or disbursed to the Government of Belgium, its institutions, affiliated agencies, or programmes. ALSO READ: Rwanda cuts diplomatic ties with Belgium This restriction includes, but is not limited to, budget support, project funding, technical assistance grants, and payments made through third-party intermediaries. RGB warned that “any attempts to circumvent these financial restrictions, including indirect transactions through subsidiaries or partner organisations, will be subject to strict penalties.” ALSO READ: Brussels’ posture against Rwanda is ‘profoundly irresponsible’, says ex-Belgian senator Enforcement and sanctions RGB informed through the notice that non-compliance with the restrictions may result in suspension of registration or revocation of legal personality, in accordance with the applicable laws governing NGOs, faith-based organisations, and foundations. “Additional legal and administrative measures may be pursued for entities found to be in violation of this directive,” the regulator stated.

Provided by Syndigate Media Inc. (
<a href="http://syndigate.info">
 Syndigate.info
</a>
).

Rwandan Authorities Urge End to NGO Ties With Belgium Amid Church Involvement

The Rwanda Governance Board (RGB), on Thursday, March 27, announced that all international and national NGOs, faith-based organisations, a...

Doge's Next Move: Elon Musk Reveals Savings Secret

DIWIDA.NEWS government, government regulations, news, politics, politics and government

<ul class="mol-bullets-with-font">
 <li class="class">
 
 PODCAST: An in-depth look at the controversy surrounding the war plans group chat, along with Trump’s reaction to his new portrait – all on Welcome to MAGAland. Tune in now.
 
 </li>
</ul>

 Lee Zeldin, the Environmental Protection Agency administrator, declared his choice to cancel a $2 billion grant allocated to a non-governmental organization associated with Stacey Abrams, backed by the Department of Government Efficiency.


 'The DOJ/
 <a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/fbi/index.html">
 FBI
 </a>
 Are currently investigating, and the funds have been frozen," he stated. "It’s ludicrous that the Biden Administration would allocate $2 billion to an organization that formerly only received $100!


 Zeldin reacted to a post on social media from the President.
 <a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/donald_trump/index.html">
 Donald Trump
 </a>
 Who objected to the grant and instructed their administration to 'retrieve the funds'?


 Is Stacy Abrams planning to return the two billion dollars that were directed into her "environmental fund" right before I took office? She jumped from having only $100 in donations to suddenly possessing $2 billion in a single day? Impressive!
 <a href="https://x.com/DOGE/status/1904991292700123167">
 wrote
 </a>
 on social media.


 DOGE leader
 <a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/elon-musk/index.html">
 Elon Musk
 </a>
 mentioned on social media that the Abrams grant from the Biden administration was merely one of numerous grants that the department has discovered.


 'Numerous scams of this kind,' he penned.


 DOGE also
 <a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14379371/DOGE-cancels-contracts-Health-Human-Services-Fauci-museum-exhibit.html">
 stated an additional $577 million in revoked grants from the Department of Labor, bringing the total savings to $237 million.
 </a>


 The list
 <a href="https://doge.gov/savings">
 included
 </a>
 The budget includes $10 million allocated towards achieving 'gender equality in the Mexican workforce,' $12.2 million designated for 'empowering workers across South America,' and $6.25 million set aside for enhancing 'respect for labor rights within agricultural supply chains' throughout Honduras, Guatemala, and El Salvador.

<img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/image/AA1BMJOs" data-reference="image" src="https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1BMJOs.jpg"/>
<img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/image/AA1BMyos" data-reference="image" src="https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1BMyos.jpg"/>
<img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/image/AA1BMCp5" data-reference="image" src="https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1BMCp5.jpg"/>

 The budget cuts affected several initiatives including $5 million allocated to boost women’s involvement in workplaces across West Africa, $4.3 million intended to support foreign migrant workers in Malaysia, along with separate allocations of $3 million each; one aimed at improving social security and labor rights for domestic migrants in Bangladesh, and another focused on fostering safe and inclusive working conditions in Lesotho.


 DOGE asserts it has saved Americans $130 billion, equating to $807.45 per taxpayer, while Musk’s key associates keep searching through every federal agency for additional savings.

<a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14543893/doge-target-elon-musk-saved-americans.html">
 Read more
</a>

Doge's Next Move: Elon Musk Reveals Savings Secret

PODCAST: An in-depth look at the controversy surrounding the war plans group chat, along with Trump’s reaction to his new portrait ...