News.Life

Silver Lining Emerges as Malaysia Navigates US Tariffs

Unknown business, economics, government regulations, international economics, international trade

PETALLING JAYA: While the US imposing tariffs may seem gloomy, it actually presents an opportunity for our country, according to various trade associations.
 
 
 The President of the Federation of Malaysian Manufacturers, Tan Sri Soh Thian Lai, stated that although the 24% tariff imposed on Malaysia is far from perfect, it offers certain strategic benefits when compared with neighboring countries.
 
 
 numerous ASEAN nations such as Vietnam, Cambodia, and Laos along with China are encountering substantially increased bilateral US tariffs, with some approaching twice the rate imposed on Malaysia.
 
 
 This change effectively flattens the competition landscape and places Malaysia in a more appealing position for exports, particularly for purchasers looking to move away from pricier nations.
 
 
 "We can leverage this competitive edge to grab a portion of the U.S. market in specific product segments," he stated upon being reached for comment.
 
 
 Although sectors such as semiconductors and pharmaceuticals are not subject to the tariff increase, Soh mentioned that other industries could still see advantages.
 
 
 They encompass items such as rubber gloves, electronic gadgets, packaged foods, aviation parts, furniture, and medical equipment.
 
 
 "These sectors are areas where Malaysia has demonstrated expertise, and where rival suppliers from China or Vietnam currently encounter increased tariff obstacles," he stated.
 
 
 Soh observed that Malaysia's robust manufacturing capabilities, varied supply chain network, and credible regulations could establish the country as a dependable alternative within global supply chains catering to the U.S. market.
 
 
 <img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/image/AA1CmYGY" data-reference="image" src="https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1CmYGY.jpg"/>
 
 
 The Associated Chinese Chambers of Commerce and Industry Malaysia Treasurer-General, Datuk Koong Lin Loong, stated that imposing elevated tariffs on other countries within the Southeast Asian region might result in substantial long-term benefits for Malaysia.
 
 
 The bright side we should focus on is the possibility of turning Malaysia into a key regional investment center.
 
 
 "Investors prefer putting their money here over countries like China and Vietnam, where they faced heavier tariffs," he stated.
 
 
 He mentioned that the country's attractiveness as an investment destination was enhanced because of its robust economy, consistent governmental policies, and capable workforce.
 
 
 These are key elements that investors take into account.
 
 
 “Although the US tariffs on the Philippines (17%) and Singapore (10%) are lower than Malaysia, investors may find policies in the Philippines not so conducive while Singapore may be too expensive for them to set up operations,” he said.
 
 
 Koong mentioned that the strengthening of the ringgit against the US dollar can be attributed to robust economic indicators within the country and the currency being considered undervalued.
 
 
 Given the imposed tariffs, fund managers view the currency’s potential.
 
 
 "Additionally, our stock market has stayed above the 1,500 level, unlike some others that experienced significant drops," he noted.
 
 
 The President of the SME Association of Malaysia, Chin Chee Seong, stated that these tariffs will affect certain areas but primarily target particular high-tech and premium petroleum goods rather than across all sectors like in various other nations within the Asia-Pacific area.
 
 
 Relative to several nations like Laos, Cambodia, Vietnam, and China, our situation remains comparatively more favorable.
 
 
 We primarily export advanced technology goods and premium petroleum products, constituting the major portion of our transactions with the United States; concurrently, we maintain a comparatively modest trade imbalance.
 
 
 "We are in a more favorable situation since items like semiconductors are not subject to tariffs. Therefore, we will probably face only a 10% tariff on most of our other exported goods," he stated when reached for comment.
 
 
 Chin observed that Malaysia was heading in the correct direction by avoiding retaliatory actions towards the United States and choosing instead to pursue a policy of friendly interaction.
 
 
 He thought that US President Donald Trump might experience another phase of tariff modifications because of the criticism he is receiving from various nations as well as within his own country.
 
 
 The co-chairman of the Asean-India Business Council, Nivas Ragavan, noted that Malaysia avoided increased tariffs thanks to its equitable trading relationship with the United States, especially in critical sectors like electrical and electronic products, medical equipment, and precise components which demand stringent compliance standards.
 
 
 "These sectors are closely intertwined with U.S. supply chains and follow international regulatory standards, which might have led the United States to apply a lesser tariff rate than other regional exporters who have distinct trade profiles," he explained.
 
 
 Nivas, who also serves as the vice-chairman of the Federation of Malaysian Businesses Association, stated that reducing tariffs for Malaysia would offer the country a stronger competitive edge.
 
 
 Many of our ASEAN neighbors now encounter higher expenses when exporting goods to the United States.
 
 
 "This might steer specific American purchasers and investors towards Malaysia, notably within areas such as manufacturing, electronics, and medical equipment," he stated.
 
 
 He mentioned that the nation could utilize its current free trade pacts and business-conducive atmosphere to draw in shifts in supply chains from nations with higher tariffs.
 
 
 "There's an opening here for Malaysian exporters to seize, innovate, and take over the space vacated by their regional rivals," he noted.
 
 
 As for the ringgit’s recent appreciation, Nivas said that this could be due to the volatility of the US economy due to inflationary pressure.
 
 
 "In the Malaysian context, persistent trade surpluses, higher commodity prices especially for palm oil and energy, along with a gradual rebound in local consumption, are bolstering faith in the ringgit," he further stated.
 
 
 The advisor of Bumiputera Retailers Organization Malaysia, Datuk Ameer Ali Mydin, stated that products brought in from nations facing increased tariffs might ultimately be sold in this country for less money.
 
 
 This is because companies in those impacted nations might produce more than needed domestically as a result of increased taxes on exports to the United States.
 
 
 "Nevertheless, we need to be cautious about avoiding dumping from these nations, which is currently occurring via e-commerce platforms and could impact our retail industry," he stated.

Silver Lining Emerges as Malaysia Navigates US Tariffs

Unknown business, economics, government regulations, international economics, international trade

PETALLING JAYA: While the US imposing tariffs may seem gloomy, it actually presents an opportunity for our country, according to various trade associations. The President of the Federation …

Kahariri, Haji Slogan Order Erodes Constitutional Integrity

Unknown government, government regulations, politics, politics and government, politics and law

Selfish Legislators • How can Members of Parliament defend their recent raise of KES 360,000 when intern doctors aren’t receiving their agreed-upon wages because "there are insufficient funds"? queries Ruth Gituma. She questions why none of the politicians seem bothered enough to speak out about this issue publicly. This raises doubts as to whether these officials prioritize nothing beyond personal gain." For correspondence reach her at rgitum@gmail.com.
Inconsistency • The very commission that sanctioned a wage hike worth KES 360,000 for parliamentarians, senators, and women representatives advised public sector workers like educators and medical professionals not to anticipate increases anytime soon," states Eliab Otiato. "Such practices suggest a double standard; treating everyone equally yet privileging certain groups over others?" You may get in touch with him via mabwaeliab@gmail.com.
Political Reflections • The successful presidency of Ibrahim Traoré underscores issues within democratic systems throughout Africa,” asserts Newton Tonui. “Traoré’s achievements under authoritarian rule contrast sharply with those claimed by several democratically chosen African heads-of-state.” Interested parties should direct communications to newtoniu.kl@gmail.com.
Authoritarianism Concerns • Chiefs of Defense Forces Charles Kahereri and Intelligence Director Noordin Haji discouraged citizens from voicing discontent through slogans such as 'Ruto Must Go,' thereby violating fundamental rights regarding free speech according to Edwin Wagara. Their directive seems reminiscent of autocratic governance methods rather than upholding constitutionally protected freedoms." Contact information for Mr. Wagara is available at edwinwagara@gmail.com.
Unresolved Puzzle • What insights does Carol Maina seek into potential irregularities surrounding Kenya’s eCitizen payment system? According to Ms. Maina, confusion reigns supreme concerning management responsibilities for online transactions particularly during hospital visits where additional fees apply without clear justification. Additionally, ease of use remains questionable despite frequent utilization attempts." Those wishing to communicate directly might send emails addressed to carshima2000@yahoo.com.
Have an informative evening!
Provided courtesy of Syndigate.Media Inc.
Syndigate.info
).

Kahariri, Haji Slogan Order Erodes Constitutional Integrity

Unknown government, government regulations, politics, politics and government, politics and law

New Driving Laws Take Effect Today — Here’s What You Need to Know or Face Fines

Unknown car safety, driving, government regulations, laws and regulations, traffic laws

Michigan’s updated car seat regulations, designed to
 improving child safety
 , comes into force today—imposing penalties for non-compliant drivers.


 The revised regulations pertain to kids aged 13 and younger, mandating more stringent seating provisions according to their age and dimensions.


 Babies under two years of age require a rear-facing car seat for safety, with this configuration permitted in the front seat solely when the airbag has been turned off.


 After turning two years old, they will need to use a forward-facing car seat until reaching the age of five.


 Children aged five to eight should use a belt-positioning booster seat along with both a lap and shoulder strap.


 Once they turn eight years old, they can stop using the booster seat unless their height or weight deems itunsafe.


 Children who reach almost five feet in height before they turn eight years old can bypass using a booster seat.


 Motorists who do not comply with the updated regulations will be subject to a $65 penalty, which comprises a $25 civil fine, court expenses, and a $40 charge for the justice system.

<img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/image/AA1CbmUj" data-reference="image" src="https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1CbmUj.jpg"/>
<img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/image/AA1Cbe53" data-reference="image" src="https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1Cbe53.jpg"/>
<div class="art-ins mol-factbox money">
 
 
 
 New 2025 Driving Laws
 
 
 
 
 <div class="ins cleared mol-factbox-body">
 <ul class="mol-bullets-with-font">
 <li class="">
 A legislation in California bans drivers from parking their vehicles within 20 feet of any crosswalk.
 </li>
 <li>
 Tougher sanctions for street racing in California
 </li>
 <li>
 Updates to Car Seat Age and Weight Guidelines in Colorado
 </li>
 <li class="">
 Penalties for not adhering to specified entry and exit points for express lanes in Colorado
 </li>
 <li>
 Prohibitions against using handheld devices when driving in Colorado and Missouri
 </li>
 <li>
 In Illinois, drivers are permitted to carry a digital version of their license on their smartphones.
 </li>
 <li>
 Give priority to emergency vehicles when driving in Illinois.
 </li>
 <li>
 Drivers in Kentucky must undergo a vision test when they apply to renew their driver’s license.
 </li>
 <li>
 Oregon school bus safety legislation
 </li>
 <li class="">
 Vehicle safety checks eliminated in Texas
 </li>
 </ul>
 </div>
 
</div>

 The legislators introduced these new regulations because automobile accidents represent the leading cause of death among young children in Michigan.


 'During the previous twenty years, Michigan saw an increase in the usage of Child Restraint Devices for children under 4 years old, rising from 74.5 percent in 1997 to 98.2 percent in 2018.'
 Michigan Department of Highway Safety Planning
 said in 2022.


 Despite these improvements, 61 percent of children under 4 years old who died in vehicle collisions in Michigan between 2017 and 2021 were not secured in a rear- or forward-facing child restraint device.


 The Michigan State Police think these laws might reduce the risk of death by as much as 50 percent.


 The new regulations have also been introduced following the turmoil across the US due to the approaching deadline.
 get a Real ID for traveling
 .


 The Department of Homeland Security verified
 passengers boarding domestic flights
 Without a passport, you'll require a government-issued ID by May 7.


 The significant demand led DMVs across states like New Jersey and Tennessee to extend their operational hours to better serve individuals requiring these IDs.

Read more

New Driving Laws Take Effect Today — Here’s What You Need to Know or Face Fines

Unknown car safety, driving, government regulations, laws and regulations, traffic laws

Michigan’s updated car seat regulations, designed to improving child safety , comes into force today—imposing penalties for non-compliant drivers. The revised regulations pertain to kids aged 13 …

Farmers Stunned as USDA Proposes Axing DEI From Energy Projects

Unknown agriculture, environmental science, government, government regulations, rural development

<img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/image/AA1Ca0Kb" data-reference="image" src="https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1Ca0Kb.jpg"/>

 The Department of Agriculture has an announcement for farmers.
 owed federal grant money
 Think about removing "counterproductive DEIA" elements from your initiatives to receive funding more quickly.


 The department informed those farmers in a letter sent last week that they would start handling the delayed payments after thirty days. However, they are initially urging the farmers to modify their energy initiatives, like setting up solar panels or enhancing ventilation systems, so as to eliminate diversity elements or implement other changes that more closely match President Donald Trump’s objectives.


 "When I received that, I sent it to my USDA representative and asked, 'What on earth does this mean?'" said Michael Protas, who was granted money to put up solar panels on his farm in Dickerson, Maryland.


 The interruption of three rural energy initiatives, which were halted by the Trump administration in January, has stranded farmers and led to a federal lawsuit. According to a letter from the USDA sent out last week, they will start releasing the delayed funds, ensuring that all recipients will ultimately get their allocated money.


 The department distributed an optional web-based questionnaire to impacted farmers, encouraging them to suggest modifications within thirty days. Participants completing this survey—whether agreeing with proposed adjustments or indicating they wouldn’t change their plans—would see their financial support expedited upon review and acceptance of suggested alterations as per the department’s guidelines. Conversely, individuals failing to respond shall experience a one-month delay before the department initiates the disbursement process for their grants.


 Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins stated that the department was making adjustments following the Inflation Reduction Act, which is associated with President Joe Biden.
 key climate and healthcare legislation
 , “delivered more bureaucracy than benefits for rural families.”


 But farmers said the announcement created only more confusion and another hurdle to receive funding they desperately need to pay off loans and replenish money already spent on projects. Some reported finally receiving their payments this week without having altered their projects. Others said that they feared their contracts with the USDA would be voided if they responded to the survey in the wrong way and that they weren’t sure what changes the Agriculture Department is looking for.


 “DEI has nothing to do with solar panels,” Protas said. “I don’t know what they’re asking for.”


 The Agriculture Department declined to answer questions from The Washington Post about what changes to remove diversity, equity, inclusion and accessibility from rural energy projects could entail.


 The funding embargo began on Trump’s inaugural day as he signed an order.
 executive order
 To hold back millions of dollars in funds pledged to farmers from past years aimed at promoting sustainable and energy-efficient farming methods. Numerous agreements included compensating farmers for their costs; however, the delay in payments placed these financial burdens squarely on them.


 On March 13, multiple farmers along with nonprofit organizations
 sued
 The Agriculture Department is being accused of improperly holding back funds that Congress had allocated. (According to Hana Vizcarra, an attorney with Earthjustice, one plaintiff in the lawsuit was granted funding on Monday. The Agriculture Department has not responded to inquiries from The Post regarding the lawsuit.)


 “They expect the government just to fulfill their obligations,” Vizcarra said. “And instead, as the new administration came in, they just froze all the funds and disrupted work that was already ongoing and put everything at risk.”


 The request for farmers to complete a survey and consider changing their projects came as another frustrating curveball to those who have waited months for their money under the Empowering Rural America (New ERA), Powering Affordable Clean Energy (PACE) and Rural Energy for America (REAP) programs.


 “It just adds more confusion,” said Protas, who took out a roughly $97,000 loan to install solar panels on his farm. A REAP grant was supposed to cover about half the amount.


 The Agriculture Department’s letter said that, besides removing diversity features, project revisions could include using “more affordable and effective energy sources” and implementing changes to increase “production, transportation, refining and generation capacity of energy and critical minerals.”


 The department had earlier taken pride in rejecting grants aimed at promoting diversity programs. In a March social media post, Rollins mentioned that she terminated a $397,000 grant to a California-based non-profit organization running a training initiative for aspiring farmers. She stated this program was focused on teaching "queer, trans, and BIPOC urban farmers and consumers about food justice," as reported by Civil Eats.
 reported
 .


 Earthjustice
 called
 The announcement was labeled as a "stunt" and the department was accused of fabricating an excuse to withhold funds from farmers who refuse to alter their programs. Vizcarra also mentioned that farmers supported through various other USDA initiatives continue to be without the financial assistance they were expecting.


 This simply seems like an extra obstacle we have to overcome," she stated. "There’s no reason for them to further complicate things for those who received grants by making them wonder if they must use specific phrases to obtain funds that the government has already committed to giving.


 Travis Forgues, who operates a dairy farm in Westby, Wisconsin, along with his spouse, Amy, mentioned that he anticipates receiving approximately a $55,000 REAP grant to assist with the cost of installing solar panels. Last week, the pair completed the USDA’s questionnaire and stated they wouldn’t be altering their plans for the project.


 I hope we haven't made an error here," Forgues stated. "When discussing topics like solar power or energy autonomy, this isn't really related to diversity, equity, and inclusion issues. To be honest, even if it were tied to those matters, I wouldn't consider it significant.


 David Funk manages an energy consultancy firm that offers services funded by REAP for farmers in Idaho and nearby regions like Washington. Last week, he submitted a declaration stating that he wouldn’t alter his program’s operations and recommended his farming clientele follow suit. Although he got paid on Monday evening, several of the farmers collaborating with him have yet to receive their funds.


 Funk stated that he appreciated the Agriculture Department’s commitment to providing compensation to recipients at last. However, he also noted that it seemed inefficient for the government to subject farmers to such prolonged ambiguity before reinstating their access to financial resources.


 "They have harmed numerous businesses and undermined the reliability of the government in their pursuit to eliminate DEI from things that do not actually possess it," Funk stated.

Farmers Stunned as USDA Proposes Axing DEI From Energy Projects

Unknown agriculture, environmental science, government, government regulations, rural development

The Department of Agriculture has an announcement for farmers. owed federal grant money Think about removing "counterproductive DEIA" elements from your initiatives to receive funding more quickly…

CBP Collects Over $200M Daily in 'Liberation Day' Tariffs as Collections Kick In

Unknown border security, economics, government regulations, international economics, u.s. customs and border protection

<img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/video/AA1Cn2Nd" data-reference="video"/>
 
 The U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) is currently amassing more than $200 million daily in additional funds due to the enforcement of extensive new tariff measures.
 President Donald Trump
 's "Liberation Day" plan.
 
 
 “During this administration, CBP has effectively carried out 13 tariff-related executive orders,” stated a CBP representative to FOX Business. “Operating at the forefront of our nation, CBP rigorously upholds all regulations and presidential instructions to protect our country’s economic autonomy.”
 
 
 Leveraging authorities granted through the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 and the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), the Trump administration has set its sights on products originating from numerous nations, with China being one of them.
 
 
 On April 3, the U.S. introduced a 25% tariff on all imported passenger cars and light trucks from every nation, followed by an additional 10% tariff on Saturday.
 global tariff took effect
 Under the IEEPA, CBP stated, with some exceptions.
 
 
 
 TRUMP'S CHINA TARIFS ARE FACING A LEGAL CHALLENGE FROM A CONSERVATIVE ORGANIZATION THAT DEEMS THEM 'ILLEGAL.'
 
 
 <img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/image/AA1Cb6Hi" data-reference="image" src="https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1Cb6Hi.jpg"/>
 
 Starting April 9, 86 nations will encounter new reciprocal tariffs that range between 11% and 50%, though certain exceptions apply. Additionally, as of May 2, items originating from China and Hong Kong with an individual value not exceeding $800, which are sent through channels beyond the international postal service, will lose their eligibility for exemption from duties and must instead pay regular rates, as stated by CBP.
 
 
 
 REVIEW ON THE FOX BUSINESS APPLICATION
 
 
 
 In the meantime, beginning in May, postal deliveries originating from China and Hong Kong will be subject to a duty of either 30% or $25 per item, with the higher amount being applied. This tariff will rise to $50 per item effective June 1st.
 
 
 
 THE SENATOR ATTEMPTS TO SABOTAGE THE CRUCIAL TRUMP BUDGET PROCESS BY CHALLENGING TARIFFESESQUE
 
 
 <img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/image/AA1Cb25L" data-reference="image" src="https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1Cb25L.jpg"/>
 
 CBP says it’s working closely with other agencies to roll out these changes and will keep the trade community updated through its online messaging system.
 
 
 The agency has already generated billions of dollars in revenue.
 earlier Trump executive orders
 .
 
 
 This encompasses $4.8 billion under EO 14195, which aims at
 synthetic opioids from China
 ; $861 million allocated through Executive Order 14193, designed to halt drug trafficking from Canada; more than $2 billion set aside via Executive Order 14194, tackling trade problems along the southern border; and $1 billion gathered from tariffs imposed on steel and aluminum under Section 232.
 
 <img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/image/AA1CfyS8" data-reference="image" src="https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1CfyS8.jpg"/>
 
 The CBP is ideally situated to put into action and enforce the President's tariffs," stated the CBP representative. "We have all necessary resources and are prepared to gather the due duties.
 
 
 Tariff rates for particular items can be located in the
 Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States
 .
 S.
 


 
 Original article source:
 CBP is already gathering 'Liberation Day' tariffs, generating more than $200 million daily in extra income.

CBP Collects Over $200M Daily in 'Liberation Day' Tariffs as Collections Kick In

Unknown border security, economics, government regulations, international economics, u.s. customs and border protection

The U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) is currently amassing more than $200 million daily in additional funds due to the enforcement of extensive new tariff measures. President Donald T…

CBP Collects Over $200M Daily in 'Liberation Day' Tariffs

Unknown border security, economics, government regulations, international economics, u.s. customs and border protection

<img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/video/AA1Cn2Nd" data-reference="video"/>
 
 The U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) is currently amassing more than $200 million daily in additional funds due to the enforcement of extensive new tariff measures.
 President Donald Trump
 's "Liberation Day" plan.
 
 
 “During this administration, CBP has effectively carried out 13 tariff-related executive orders,” stated a CBP representative to FOX Business. “As the front line of defense for our country, CBP rigorously upholds all statutes and presidential instructions to protect our nation’s economic autonomy.”
 
 
 Leveraging authorities granted by the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 and the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), the Trump administration has set its sights on products originating from numerous nations such as China.
 
 
 On April 3rd, the U.S. implemented a 25% tariff on all imported passenger cars and light trucks from every nation, followed by an additional 10% tariff on Saturday.
 global tariff took effect
 under IEEPA, with certain exclusions, CBP said.
 
 
 
 TRUMP’S CHINA TARIFFS FACE LEGAL CHALLENGE FROM CONSERVATIVE GROUP CALLING THEM ‘UNLAWFUL'
 
 
 <img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/image/AA1Cb6Hi" data-reference="image" src="https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1Cb6Hi.jpg"/>
 
 Beginning April 9, 86 countries will face new reciprocal tariffs ranging from 11% to 50%, with some exclusions, and on May 2, products from China and Hong Kong valued at or under $800 and shipped outside the international postal system will no longer be eligible for duty-free treatment and will be subject to standard duties, according to CBP.
 
 
 
 READ ON THE FOX BUSINESS APP
 
 
 
 In the meantime, beginning in May, postal deliveries originating from China and Hong Kong will be subject to a duty of either 30% or $25 per item, with the higher amount being applied. The charge will then go up to $50 per item effective June 1st.
 
 
 
 THE SENATOR ATTEMPTS TO INTERRUPT THE CRUCIAL TRUMP BUDGET PROCESS BY QUESTIONING TARIFFESESQUE MEASURES
 
 
 <img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/image/AA1Cb25L" data-reference="image" src="https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1Cb25L.jpg"/>
 
 The CBP mentions that they are collaborating intensively with various agencies to implement these modifications and will maintain communication with the trading community via their online messaging platform.
 
 
 The agency has already generated billions of dollars.
 earlier Trump executive orders
 .
 
 
 That includes $4.8 billion under EO 14195, which targets
 synthetic opioids from China
 ; $861 million allocated through Executive Order 14193, designed to prevent drug trafficking from Canada; more than $2 billion provided via Executive Order 14194, tackling trade problems along the southern border; and $1 billion gathered from tariffs imposed on steel and aluminum under Section 232.
 
 <img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/image/AA1CfyS8" data-reference="image" src="https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1CfyS8.jpg"/>
 
 The CBP is ideally situated to carry out and enforce the President's tariffs," stated the CBP spokesperson. "We have all necessary resources and are prepared to gather the due duties.
 
 
 Tariff rates for particular items can be located in the
 Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States
 .
 S.
 


 
 Original article source:
 CBP is already gathering 'Liberation Day' duties, generating more than $200 million daily in extra income.

CBP Collects Over $200M Daily in 'Liberation Day' Tariffs

Unknown border security, economics, government regulations, international economics, u.s. customs and border protection

The U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) is currently amassing more than $200 million daily in additional funds due to the enforcement of extensive new tariff measures. President Donald T…

Doge Senator Tells Outdoor Group to 'Go Fish' After Uncovering Grant Tied to Excessive Salaries

Unknown government, government regulations, politics, politics and government, sports

<img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/video/AA1BNipa" data-reference="video"/>
 
 
 EXCLUSIVE:
 
 A
 top DOGE leader
 In the Senate, efforts are underway to secure a substantial federal grant from a non-profit dedicated to advancing fishing, boating, and outdoor activities. The concern raised is that these funds might be misused for inflating executive compensation, an assertion the organization denies.
 
 
 Sen. Joni Ernst
 , from R-Iowa, along with her team, has been examining federal grants for signs of waste, fraud, or misuse of public money. They discovered a $27 million grant awarded to the Recreational Boating and Fishing Foundation.
 RBFF
 ).
 
 
 Over $26 million from the grant had already been distributed, and looking at the longer timeframe, RBFF has received $164 million in total funding since 2012, including almost $13 million that was allocated for this year in 2024.
 
 
 From the government website
 USA Spending
 The aim of the grant emphasizes RBFF’s "Take Me Fishing" public initiative, which encompasses elements such as social and digital media engagement, advertisements on Walt Disney Company-owned streaming platforms, and “portable fishing stations” designed for urban areas and underrepresented groups.
 
 
 
 DOGE MADNESS: SETUP FOR THE SWEET 16 BRACKET FEATURING THE MOST BIZARRE FEDERAL EXPENSES VIE FOR THE TITLE
 
 
 <img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/video/AA1BNipg" data-reference="video"/>
 
 The Disney deal is valued at $1.99 million, and
 other expenditures
 encompassed $204,000 for SEO consultancy, $5 million with a Minnesota-based agency for media, creative development, and design services, and $189,000 to a hotel in Atlanta.
 
 
 
 REVIEW ON THE FOX NEWS APPLICATION
 
 
 
 The non-profit organization based in Alexandria, Virginia, reported six-figure salaries for multiple senior executives, amounting to over $1.5 million collectively. It is said that the group’s president receives an annual salary of around $318,000. Many of the remaining key personnel earn salaries ranging from the high hundred thousands.
 
 
 Nevertheless, representatives from RBFF asserted their stance in a declaration to Fox News Digital, maintaining that public monies are being utilized appropriately.
 
 
 "The RBFF boasts a strong legacy of drawing Americans to the activities of fishing and boating," the statement said.
 
 
 
 DOGECOIN-CAUCUS Senator Advocates for Termination of Slush Fund for Presidential Aspirants
 
 
 <img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/image/AA1BNrnm" data-reference="image" src="https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1BNrnm.jpg"/>
 
 Over the last decade, substantial growth in engagement has led to direct advantages for independent enterprises, producers, and nearby neighborhoods through heightened expenditures.
 
 
 RBFF stated that American fishermen generate approximately $150 billion in economic impact and support about 1 million jobs across the country.
 
 
 The organization stated that 'in reality, we understand that each fisher contributes $1,500 annually to commercial activities, a statistic that stimulates economic action across all states within the federation.'
 
 
 All of our funding comes from a competitive grant provided by the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service through the Sport Fish Restoration excise tax. Our organization receives support from state fish and wildlife agencies along with industry manufacturers and retailers spanning from Alaska to Florida.
 
 <img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/video/AA1AYVHA" data-reference="video"/>
 
 Ernst remained unconvinced and told Fox News Digital, “Washington completely fell for enriching pricey recreational consultants.”
 
 
 She joked that "special interests" should instead be advised to "take a hike."
 
 
 The Department of Interior should reclaim the leftover $650,000 and inform these consultants that they can look elsewhere for opportunities.
 
 
 Fox News Digital additionally contacted the Interior Department seeking further comments regarding the grant, which was issued before the current administration took charge.
 


 
 Original article source:
 Dogecoin senator advises outdoor organization to 'take a hike' following discovery of substantial grants linked to elevated compensation.

Doge Senator Tells Outdoor Group to 'Go Fish' After Uncovering Grant Tied to Excessive Salaries

Unknown government, government regulations, politics, politics and government, sports

EXCLUSIVE: A top DOGE leader In the Senate, efforts are underway to secure a substantial federal grant from a non-profit dedicated to advancing fishing, boating, and outdoor activi…

Klarifikasi Kurang Jelas: Peninjauan atas Mekanisme Kerja dan Pengawasan Satuan Tugas Transisi Energi

Unknown business, energy sector, government, government regulations, politics and government

<img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/image/AA1C7QN9" data-reference="image" src="https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1C7QN9.jpg"/>

 
 
 DIWIDA
 
 
 ,
 
 
 Jakarta
 
 
 - Pemerintah mendirikan Satuan Tugas atau
 
 Satgas Transisi Energi
 
 Dan Ekonomi Hijau untuk mengejar tujuan penurunan emisi. Akan tetapi, keefektifannya diragukan akibat kurangnya data tentang cara kerjanya serta pemantauan yang memadai.


 Ahli Penelitian tentang Kebijakan Energi dan Perubahan Iklim dari Grup Ilmiah
 TransisiEnergiBerkeadilan.id
 Wira Dillon merasakan ada banyak hal yang belum terang tentang satgas tersebut. Ia hanya dapat menebak-nebak bahwa satgas akan berfungsi sebagai 'tempat' lanjutan.
 
 JETP
 
 (Kerjasama Transisi Energi yang Lebih Berkelanjutan) di Indonesia.


 "JETP Indonesia mungkin harus
 downsizing
 Sekretariat tersebut dibentuk pada pertengahan tahun ini terkait dengan penarikan Amerika Serikat dari JETP Indonesia," ujar Wira saat diwawancara oleh Tempo, Selasa, 2 April 2025.


 Wira menggarisbawahi kebutuhan adanya proses pengawasan yang lebih transparan. Menurut pandangannya, partisipasi masyarakat dalam sekretariat JETP Indonesia sampai saat ini belum optimal dan kurang mempunyai sistem untuk menyampaikan saran atau kritik dengan efektif. Harapannya, tim tugas tersebut akan memiliki ketentuan yang jelas tentang hal itu.
 oversight
 dari aspek publik yang lebih terang.


 Selain itu, dia mengira bahwa tim tugas khusus dibuat untuk membantu dalam pencairan dana peralihan energi serta konstruksi lingkungan yang berkelanjutan, termasuk perdagangan emisi. Namun, rincian besar dari rencananya masih kabur, katanya lagi. Menurut informasi yang mereka miliki hingga saat ini, sepertinya mayoritas upaya tetap difokuskan pada JETP dan Rencana Investasi dan Kebijakan Lengkap (CIPP).


 Wira juga menggarisbawahi bahwa keberhasilan dari tim tugas ini sangat tergantung pada hubungan yang baik dengan Badan Pengelola Investasi Dana Antarabangsa. "Jika tim tugas ini dirancang tanpa mempertimbangkan interaksi dengan Dana Antarabangsa, maka saya ragu apakah nanti tim ini akan menjadi hanya formalitas dan respons atas harapan-harapan para penyumbang dalam Program Beralih Energi Terbarukan," katanya.


 Tanpa adanya hubungan yang jelas dengan Danantara, Wira mengungkapkan kekhawatirannya bahwa proyek-proyek yang bertentangan dengan sasaran transisi energi, contohnya proyek Dimethyl Ether (DME), masih akan tetap dilanjutkan. Dia menambahkan meski satgas tersebut dinyatakan menjadi sebagian dari usaha untuk mencapai transisi energi yang lestari.


 Sebelumnya, Menteri Koordinator Bidang Perekonomian Airlangga Hartarto mengumumkan telah mendirikan Satuan Tugas Transisi Energi dan Ekonomi Berkelanjutan guna meraih sasaran peningkatan reduksi emisi. Pendirian tim khusus ini didasari oleh Keputusan Menteri Koordinator Bidang Perekonomian No. 141 Tahun 2025.


 "Indonesia masih mematok penurunan emisi sebanyak 31,89% dengan usaha sendiri, dan bisa mencapai 43% jika menerima dukungan keuangan dari luar negeri, semua itu bertujuan untuk tahun 2030," ungkap Airlangga saat konferensi pers di Kantor Kemenko Kemeri Ekonomi, Jakarta Pusat, Senin, 24 Maret 2025.


 Satuan tugas tersebut dikendalikan oleh badannya dan dirancang dengan empat timkerja. Empat bagian itu adalah Energi Terbarukan dan Penurunan Emisi pada Tahap Awal; Industri Ramah Lingkungan dan Reduksi Emisi pada Tahap Akhir; Kerjasama, Pendanaan, dan Investasi Berkelanjutan; serta Aspek Sosial, Ekonomi, Perlindungan Lingkungan, dan Pembinaan Kemampuan Sumber Daya Manusia.


 
 Ervana Trikarinaputri
 
 berkontribusi dalam tulisan ini.

Klarifikasi Kurang Jelas: Peninjauan atas Mekanisme Kerja dan Pengawasan Satuan Tugas Transisi Energi

Unknown business, energy sector, government, government regulations, politics and government

DIWIDA , Jakarta - Pemerintah mendirikan Satuan Tugas atau Satgas Transisi Energi Dan Ekonomi Hijau untuk mengejar tujuan penurunan emisi. Akan tetapi, keefektifann…

Cabin Conundrum: Lovebirds Ordered to Demolish Montana Retreat

Unknown community, controversies, government regulations, laws and regulations, news

In an unexpected turn of events, a federal judge has sided with
 <a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/california/index.html">
 California
 </a>
 a couple engaged in arguments over instructions to demolish their magnificent, partially constructed cabin within
 <a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/montana/index.html">
 Montana
 </a>
 national park, enabling them to maintain the property as it is.


 The partially constructed chasm belonging to John and Stacy Ambler, situated on a 2,300-square-foot plot near McDonald Creek within Glacier National Park,
 <a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14263547/california-couple-petition-save-illegal-home-montana-glacier-national-park.html">
 has faced potential demolition following multiple complaints lodged with the Flathead Conservation District by various residents.
 </a>
 (FCD),
 <a href="https://www.sfgate.com/national-parks/article/groups-fire-back-calif-couple-national-park-home-20242416.php">
 SFGate reported
 </a>
 .


 Following multiple legal disputes, Federal Judge Kathleen DeSoto issued her decision in favor of the San Diego couple in February, stating that the FCD does not have authority over the property since it is situated inside a national park, which places it under federal jurisdiction.


 In the most recent development of this continuing conflict, both the FCD and Friends of Montana Streams and Rivers have lodged an appeal, maintaining that they possess grounds to overturn the judge's ruling.


 'Sflathead Conservation District bears the legal responsibility for safeguarding the natural resources within our district,' said Samantha Tappenbeck, a district resource conservationist, to SFGate.


 Therefore, the Flathead Conservation District Board of Supervisors chose to challenge the decision in order to serve the interests of our district’s residents and due to their belief that several aspects could be appealed.


 The Amblers started constructing their three-story, verdant Montana residence in late 2022 and early 2023. They built a concrete retaining wall along the steambank and set stone foundations into the slope to create a deck.


 Nevertheless, the couple's building endeavor sparked local controversy, with West Glacier area inhabitants complaining that the house could be easily seen by both park visitors and nearby residents.
 <a href="https://flatheadbeacon.com/2025/02/06/federal-judge-rules-in-favor-of-mcdonald-creek-homeowners/">
 Flathead Beacon reported
 </a>
 .

<img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/image/AA1BMYfa" data-reference="image" src="https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1BMYfa.jpg"/>
<img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/image/AA1BN7cU" data-reference="image" src="https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1BN7cU.jpg"/>
<img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/image/AA1BN9Tv" data-reference="image" src="https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1BN9Tv.jpg"/>

 The grievances drew the notice of the FCD, prompting them to conduct an on-site examination at the Ambler residence.


 After the examination, the district asserted that the pair had breached the state's Natural Steambed and Land Preservation Act (NSLPA), commonly referred to as the 310 law.


 They justified their decision because they thought the house had been built unlawfully, lacking all required permissions.


 According to the 310 law, any person or organization undertaking activities that involve altering or modifying the riverbed or nearby banks of a continuously flowing stream must secure the necessary permissions from the local conservation district, as mentioned by The Flathead Beacon.


 Nevertheless, the pair assert that the Flathead County Planning Office granted them approval, stating they had carte blanche to use the land however they wished since it is located in an un-zoned region, as per their information.
 <a href="https://hungryhorsenews.com/news/2025/jan/02/judge-to-hear-arguments-next-week-in-glacier-national-park-house-case/">
 Hungry Horse News
 </a>
 .


 The federal Park Service did permit the Amblers to hook up with the Apgar water and sewage systems.


 Despite this, the District's Board of Supervisors eventually decided that the couple has to demolish their partially constructed house and restore the steambed prior to April 1, 2024.


 Nevertheless, the pair opted to file lawsuits in both state and federal courts, contending that the District had overstepped its bounds.

<img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/image/AA1BN04C" data-reference="image" src="https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1BN04C.jpg"/>
<img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/image/AA1BN5gZ" data-reference="image" src="https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1BN5gZ.jpg"/>
<img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/image/AA1BMYfm" data-reference="image" src="https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1BMYfm.jpg"/>

 The locals from California do not acknowledge the District's authority over their land and assets since it falls within the boundaries of the national park and sits on an inholding—a piece of private property established before the park was created in 1910.


 They assert that the property is part of Apgar, a tiny, privately held community within the park established in 1908.


 The District alleged that the Amblers were attempting to locate the ambiguous zone since they asserted that Montana holds no authority over the property due to its location within a national park, which enjoys federal protection. However, they simultaneously argued that the federal government cannot claim access because the land is considered privately owned.


 Nevertheless, the District asserted that both state and local laws apply to private property, irrespective of its location, even within Glacier National Park.


 However, the couple contended that when they transferred ownership of the land, Montana had ceded jurisdiction to the United States, as stated by their attorney, Trent Baker, according to Hungry Horse News.


 At the heart of the organization's case is the assertion that even though the property is situated inside Glacier National Park, this does not absolve it from complying with Montana’s state regulations, notably the Montana Natural Streambed and Land Protection Act (NSLPA).


 In contrast, the pair contended that the Steambed Act was enacted only in 1976, which means that Montana's state laws were not eligible for federal recognition, as reported by SFGate.


 The couple additionally mentioned that the national park should be responsible for governing private inholdings, asserting that the FCD cannot independently reclaim authority over territories where the state of Montana had previously relinquished control to the United States, as reported by the Flathead Beacon.

<img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/image/AA1BN7d3" data-reference="image" src="https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1BN7d3.jpg"/>
<img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/image/AA1BN7d7" data-reference="image" src="https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1BN7d7.jpg"/>
<img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/image/AA1BNciT" data-reference="image" src="https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1BNciT.jpg"/>
<img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/image/AA1BN7dc" data-reference="image" src="https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1BN7dc.jpg"/>

 The sole concern in this matter pertains to whether federal or state authorities have jurisdiction over the Amblers' estate, as stated by their lawyer, Trent Baker, in the summary judgment, according to the source.


 In DeSoto’s directive, she stated that the arguments exceeded ‘the boundaries set by the single claim presented in the complaint… specifically, that FCD has no authority over the Ambler property, and that the Streambed Act is not applicable.’


 In order for the appeals to continue in court, lawyers from both entities need to file their briefs by May 28.


 Officials from Glacier National Park mentioned earlier that they were collaborating with lawyers from the US Department of the Interior to decide if they would participate in the lawsuit, according to SFGATE.


 "The Amblers" did not promptly reply to SANTIJAYA for commentary.

<a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14543867/california-couple-surprise-development-ordered-demolish-cabin-montana.html">
 Read more
</a>

Cabin Conundrum: Lovebirds Ordered to Demolish Montana Retreat

Unknown community, controversies, government regulations, laws and regulations, news

In an unexpected turn of events, a federal judge has sided with California a couple engaged in arguments over instructions to demolish their magnificent, partially constructed cabin within …

Age Limit Bill: Presidential and Government Candidates Face 60-Year Cap as Bill Advances

Unknown government regulations, news, politics, politics and government, politics and law

The House of Representatives has approved for second reading a bill aimed at prohibiting individuals over 60 years old from contesting for the positions of President and Governor in Nigeria.
 
 
 Should this legislation pass through parliamentary review and be enacted, President Bola Tinubu, ex-Vice President Atiku Abubakar, along with the 2023 Labour Party presidential nominee, Mr Peter Obi, would be ineligible for the 2027 presidential race due to their ages exceeding 60 years.
 
 
 Titled 'An Act to Amend the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 Regarding Qualifications Required for Individuals Elected as President and Vice-President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, Governors and Deputy Governors of States Within the Federation, and Other Connected Issues' was proposed by Imo state legislator Ikenga Ugochinyere.
 
 
 One of the 31 proposed bills that advanced past the second reading stage during Thursday's plenary session was this particular piece of legislation.
 
 
 The legislation states that "To be eligible for the presidency, an individual must have attained a minimum education level of a university degree and should hold a bachelor’s diploma in their selected area of expertise."
 
 
 Section 131 of the Main Act is revised by adding a clause that states, 'He must be under 60 years old when competing for the Presidency.'
 
 
 Section 177(d) of the main legislation is revised by modifying the educational criteria required for individuals to qualify for election as governor as follows:
 
 
 A candidate must have completed their education at least up to the university level and should hold aBachelor's degree in their selected area of study to qualify for the presidential election.
 
 
 That he is less than 60 years old at the time of competing for the position of Governor.
 
 
 A proposed law to grant legislative support for setting up Alvan Ikoku Federal University of Education in Imo State was also advanced to the next stage after passing its second reading.
 
 
 The legislation proposed by Ugochinyere seeks to enhance the stature of the organization by providing it with federal acknowledgment and financial assistance.
 
 
 The House similarly advanced a bill aimed at amending the Constitution to ensure the compulsory involvement of young individuals and those living with disabilities in political positions.
 
 
 This legislation, which has been backed by the Imo legislator, aims to foster inclusivity and representation within government structures.
 
 
 Likewise, the proposal to shift trade and commerce into the concurrent legislative list, designed to boost interstate commerce, also advanced to the next stage during the full assembly session.
 
 
 Once enacted, the suggested bill will grant authority to both federal and state governments to oversee commerce, thereby enhancing economic actions across and between these governmental levels.
 
 
 Additionally, the Federal University of Education, Zaria ( Establishment ) Bill, 2025, proposed by Speaker Abbas and Plateau state representative Yusuf Gagdi, was also reviewed and endorsed.
 
 
 The proposed legislation intends to create a specialized university dedicated to teacher training in Zaria. Additional educational bills encompass the founding of the Yusuf Maitama Sule Federal University of Education in Kano and the University of Nigerian Languages in Aba, along with several others.
 
 
 Also approved at the second reading stage is the Bill for Reserved Seats for Women in National and State Assemblies, 2025, introduced by Rep. Kafilat Ogbara.
 
 
 This legislation seeks to advance gender inclusivity by setting aside particular parliamentary positions exclusively for women.
 
 
 The bill titled "Inclusion of Youth and People with Disabilities in Political Positions," introduced by Ugochinyere, successfully advanced to the next stage after passing its second reading.
 
 
 This legislation seeks to promote increased involvement of underrepresented communities in governmental affairs.
 
 
 Moreover, judicial reforms are also part of the plan, including proposals like the Benjamin Kalu-sponsored Timeframes for Judicial Proceedings Act, 2025, aimed at improving the efficiency of the legal system within the nation.
 
 
 A different proposition, "The Augmentation of Supreme Court & Court of Appeal Judgeships Act," proposed by Bello Kaoje, suggests increasing the number of judges to enhance judicial effectiveness.
 
 
 The House likewise discussed legislation concerning the establishment of new states, where both the Wan State (North Central) Bill, 2025 and the Gobir State (North West) Bill, 2025 advanced to the second reading stage.
 

Provided by SyndiGate Media Inc.
<a href="http://syndigate.info">
 Syndigate.info
</a>
).

Age Limit Bill: Presidential and Government Candidates Face 60-Year Cap as Bill Advances

Unknown government regulations, news, politics, politics and government, politics and law

The House of Representatives has approved for second reading a bill aimed at prohibiting individuals over 60 years old from contesting for the positions of President and Governor in Nigeria. …

Amy Coney Barrett Challenges Clarence Thomas on Key Supreme Court Decision

Unknown government, government regulations, news, politics and government, politics and law

<img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/video/AA1nFEAv" data-reference="video"/>

 Amy Coney Barrett has expressed concerns about a recently proposed tax concept put forth by her colleague.
 Supreme Court
 judge,
 Clarence Thomas
 .

<h2>
 Why It Matters
</h2>

 Conservatives are eager to witness a resurgence of the nondelegation doctrine, which forbids
 Congress
 by transferring its essential lawmaking authority to federal agencies or other unelected officials.


 On March 27, Judge Amy Coney Barrett, nominated by President Trump, voiced significant reservations regarding the reinstatement of this legal principle. The doctrine has not been invoked since the 1930s and might considerably diminish the authority held by federal regulatory bodies.


 It also fits into a broader story regarding Amy Coney Barrett's position on the court, as she does.
 navigates a moderate stance on numerous social matters
 , away from the hard-line conservatism of Thomas.


 DIWIDA
 requested an email response from the Federal Communications Commission on Thursday.

<img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/image/AA1BN6Il" data-reference="image" src="https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1BN6Il.jpg"/>
<h2>
 What To Know
</h2>

 On March 26, the Supreme Court examined the case of
 Federal Communications Commission versus Consumers' Research
 In which it needed to evaluate the legitimacy of an FCC fund requiring communication firms to cover costs associated with installing telephone lines and internet cables in remote and economically underprivileged regions.


 The telecommunications firms subsequently transfer a significant portion of those additional costs to the end user.

<h2>
 Tax Cap
</h2>

 In general terms, Justice Thomas proposed that the non-delegation doctrine might serve as a means to limit how extensively the FCC or similar governmental bodies could amass funds via taxation.


 Barrett argued that imposing a cap wouldn’t work effectively. "Whether it’s $3 trillion or $5 trillion, it’s essentially just tossing around numbers without much purpose," she stated.

<h2>
 "Meaningless Exercise"
</h2>

 She posed several incisive questions to Trent McCotter, the attorney advocating for Consumers' Research, a conservative organization aiming to reduce taxes and eliminate "woke" politics, as stated on their webpage.


 When McCotter informed the court, “Essentially, this case boils down to taxation without representation,” Judge Barrett responded, “That sounds rather empty. It appears to be an insignificant endeavor.”

<h2>
 Supreme Court Clashes
</h2>

 As
 DIWIDA
 previously reported
 Justice Amy Coney Barrett and Justice Thomas have often disagreed in various Supreme Court rulings.


 Barrett expressed significant disagreement with Thomas' analysis during the oral arguments.
 United States v. Rahimi,
 a case determining whether individuals subject to a domestic violence restraining order are permitted to possess firearms.

<h2>
 Gun Control
</h2>

 In June 2024, during the oral arguments, Thomas queried Rahimi's attorney about why a criminal defendant ought to face a civil measure such as a restraining order.


 Coney Barrett swiftly retrieved a copy of the restraining order.
 prohibits Rahimi from approaching his former girlfriend or her daughter.


 She proceeded to read out the allegations listed in the restraining order involving Rahimi's purported acts of threat and intimidation toward his former girlfriend.


 In this way, Coney Barrett indicated her disagreement with Thomas’ strict interpretation of the Second Amendment. Thomas believes that one should consider solely the literal words of the Constitution, implying that American citizens have unrestricted rights to possess firearms.

<h2>
 What People Are Saying
</h2>

 In their plea to the Supreme Court to consider the FCC case,
 
 the former Solicitor General, Elizabeth Prelogar,
 
 When setting up the FCC in 1934, Congress aimed to ensure "that all Americans have access, to the greatest extent feasible, to a swift, effective national and international wired and wireless communications network equipped with sufficient resources at prices that are affordable," as stated in their documentation.


 She stated that the FCC funding aimed at supporting underprivileged areas is aiding in the pursuit of comprehensive communication access.


 On March 26, Boyden Gray & Associates, the legal firm acting for Consumer’s Research, issued a statement alleging that the FCC's fund has been marred by fraud—with millions squandered on lavish items such as luxury condominiums, private aircraft, and country club memberships. Furthermore, the Government Accountability Office reported that despite the expenditure of billions of dollars, there was no discernible increase in phone and internet services.

<h2>
 What Happens Next
</h2>

 The Supreme Court will take several months to deliberate on the case prior to publishing a written judgment. The ruling is expected to be released sometime around late 2024 or early 2025.


 
 Related Articles
 
 <ul>
 <li>
 What Amy Coney Barrett Has Stated About Same-Sex Marriage As Republicans Aim To Restructure Policies
 </li>
 <li>
 Amy Coney Barrett's Family Received Unusual Pizzas at Their Residences
 </li>
 <li>
 How Frequently Does Amy Coney Barrett Diverge From Conservative Judges on the Supreme Court?
 </li>
 <li>
 Donald Trump Supports Amy Coney Barrett Following MAGA Criticisms
 </li>
 </ul>


 Start your unlimited DIWIDAtrial

Amy Coney Barrett Challenges Clarence Thomas on Key Supreme Court Decision

Unknown government, government regulations, news, politics and government, politics and law

Amy Coney Barrett has expressed concerns about a recently proposed tax concept put forth by her colleague. Supreme Court judge, Clarence Thomas . Why It Matters Conservatives are eager to witn…

Rwandan Authorities Urge End to NGO Ties With Belgium Amid Church Involvement

Unknown government, government regulations, laws and regulations, news, politics

The Rwanda Governance Board (RGB), on Thursday, March 27, announced that all international and national NGOs, faith-based organisations, and common-benefit foundations registered and operating in Rwanda, are prohibited from having any kind of cooperation with the Government of Belgium and its affiliated entities. The RGB, which regulates faith-based and civil society organisations said move the move was in line with government’s March 17 decision to sever diplomatic relations with the Kingdom of Belgium, after the European country was accused of acting against Rwanda’s interests and taking sides in the DR Congo crisis. ALSO READ: Kagame warns Belgium against undermining Rwanda’s progress Prohibition of cooperation and partnerships Effective immediately, the RGB public notice indicated that all collaboration, partnerships, and engagements with the Government of Belgium and its affiliated institutions, non-governmental cooperation actors, agencies, and programs are prohibited. “Any ongoing projects or agreements involving these entities and other similarly affiliated entities must be terminated immediately and reported accordingly,” the public notice reads in part. Prohibition of financial transactions The regulator said that no funds, grants, donations, or financial contributions shall be received from or disbursed to the Government of Belgium, its institutions, affiliated agencies, or programmes. ALSO READ: Rwanda cuts diplomatic ties with Belgium This restriction includes, but is not limited to, budget support, project funding, technical assistance grants, and payments made through third-party intermediaries. RGB warned that “any attempts to circumvent these financial restrictions, including indirect transactions through subsidiaries or partner organisations, will be subject to strict penalties.” ALSO READ: Brussels’ posture against Rwanda is ‘profoundly irresponsible’, says ex-Belgian senator Enforcement and sanctions RGB informed through the notice that non-compliance with the restrictions may result in suspension of registration or revocation of legal personality, in accordance with the applicable laws governing NGOs, faith-based organisations, and foundations. “Additional legal and administrative measures may be pursued for entities found to be in violation of this directive,” the regulator stated.

Provided by Syndigate Media Inc. (
<a href="http://syndigate.info">
 Syndigate.info
</a>
).

Rwandan Authorities Urge End to NGO Ties With Belgium Amid Church Involvement

Unknown government, government regulations, laws and regulations, news, politics

The Rwanda Governance Board (RGB), on Thursday, March 27, announced that all international and national NGOs, faith-based organisations, and common-benefit foundations registered and operating in Rw…

Doge's Next Move: Elon Musk Reveals Savings Secret

Unknown government, government regulations, news, politics, politics and government

<ul class="mol-bullets-with-font">
 <li class="class">
 
 PODCAST: An in-depth look at the controversy surrounding the war plans group chat, along with Trump’s reaction to his new portrait – all on Welcome to MAGAland. Tune in now.
 
 </li>
</ul>

 Lee Zeldin, the Environmental Protection Agency administrator, declared his choice to cancel a $2 billion grant allocated to a non-governmental organization associated with Stacey Abrams, backed by the Department of Government Efficiency.


 'The DOJ/
 <a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/fbi/index.html">
 FBI
 </a>
 Are currently investigating, and the funds have been frozen," he stated. "It’s ludicrous that the Biden Administration would allocate $2 billion to an organization that formerly only received $100!


 Zeldin reacted to a post on social media from the President.
 <a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/donald_trump/index.html">
 Donald Trump
 </a>
 Who objected to the grant and instructed their administration to 'retrieve the funds'?


 Is Stacy Abrams planning to return the two billion dollars that were directed into her "environmental fund" right before I took office? She jumped from having only $100 in donations to suddenly possessing $2 billion in a single day? Impressive!
 <a href="https://x.com/DOGE/status/1904991292700123167">
 wrote
 </a>
 on social media.


 DOGE leader
 <a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/elon-musk/index.html">
 Elon Musk
 </a>
 mentioned on social media that the Abrams grant from the Biden administration was merely one of numerous grants that the department has discovered.


 'Numerous scams of this kind,' he penned.


 DOGE also
 <a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14379371/DOGE-cancels-contracts-Health-Human-Services-Fauci-museum-exhibit.html">
 stated an additional $577 million in revoked grants from the Department of Labor, bringing the total savings to $237 million.
 </a>


 The list
 <a href="https://doge.gov/savings">
 included
 </a>
 The budget includes $10 million allocated towards achieving 'gender equality in the Mexican workforce,' $12.2 million designated for 'empowering workers across South America,' and $6.25 million set aside for enhancing 'respect for labor rights within agricultural supply chains' throughout Honduras, Guatemala, and El Salvador.

<img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/image/AA1BMJOs" data-reference="image" src="https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1BMJOs.jpg"/>
<img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/image/AA1BMyos" data-reference="image" src="https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1BMyos.jpg"/>
<img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/image/AA1BMCp5" data-reference="image" src="https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1BMCp5.jpg"/>

 The budget cuts affected several initiatives including $5 million allocated to boost women’s involvement in workplaces across West Africa, $4.3 million intended to support foreign migrant workers in Malaysia, along with separate allocations of $3 million each; one aimed at improving social security and labor rights for domestic migrants in Bangladesh, and another focused on fostering safe and inclusive working conditions in Lesotho.


 DOGE asserts it has saved Americans $130 billion, equating to $807.45 per taxpayer, while Musk’s key associates keep searching through every federal agency for additional savings.

<a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14543893/doge-target-elon-musk-saved-americans.html">
 Read more
</a>

Doge's Next Move: Elon Musk Reveals Savings Secret

Unknown government, government regulations, news, politics, politics and government

PODCAST: An in-depth look at the controversy surrounding the war plans group chat, along with Trump’s reaction to his new portrait – all on Welcome to MAGAland. Tune in now. Lee Zeldin,…

Tesla Axed from Canada's EV Rebate Program After Exploiting the Rules

Unknown business, cars, electric cars, government regulations, tesla

<img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/image/AA1yczVM" data-reference="image" src="https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1yczVM.jpg"/>
 <h3>
 Tesla applied for over $43 million in electric vehicle rebates, but Canadian authorities decided to revoke the company's eligibility instead.
 </h3>
 <ul>
 <li>
 
 Tesla is entering its "find out" era in Canada.
 
 </li>
 <li>
 
 The Canadian authorities are looking into $43.1 million CAD ($30 million USD) worth of electric vehicle purchase incentives that Tesla has sought within merely three days.
 
 </li>
 <li>
 
 Canadian authorities have likewise prohibited Tesla from receiving iZEV incentives until the U.S. removes its tariffs.
 
 </li>
 </ul>
 
 Tesla is a dominant player in America’s electric vehicle industry; a homegrown power driving the acceptance of EVs worldwide through groundbreaking efforts—and occasionally controversial moves. This has led to occasional conflicts with regulators. Their most recent clash involves issues with oversight and compliance.
 <a href="https://insideevs.com/news/754013/canada-tesla-incentives-ban/?utm_source=msn.com&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=msn-feed">
 All of the Canadian government
 </a>
 .
 
 
 With millions of dollars at stake through Canada’s publicly funded electric vehicle incentives, along with CEO Elon Musk’s political interventions and looming U.S.-imposed tariffs set to affect Canadian products as soon as the following week, tensions have reached their peak. Currently, all subsidy payments have been suspended, and Tesla has been specifically barred from participating in any future federal government rebate initiatives in Canada—temporarily, at least.
 
 <img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/image/AA1BzDAA" data-reference="image" src="https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1BzDAA.jpg"/>
 <div class="source-title">
 Photo by: Andrei Nedelea
 </div>
 <h2>
 The Great Rebate Grab
 </h2>
 
 The
 <a href="https://insideevs.com/news/754013/canada-tesla-incentives-ban/?utm_source=msn.com&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=msn-feed">
 last straw
 </a>
 It was an uncertain assertion amounting to over $43.1 million CAD ($30 million USD) in electric vehicle (EV) incentives submitted shortly following Transport Canada’s announcement that funds for the nation's Incentives for Zero-Emission Vehicles (iZEV) program were nearly depleted. Certainly, this sum represents quite a significant figure.
 lot
 But it wasn’t merely the sum that raised concerns; it was the quantity involved.
 
 
 The demands equated to Tesla selling approximately 8,653 electric vehicles over a single weekend at only four Canadian dealerships. This would mean one vehicle sold every 30 seconds continuously for 72 hours straight.
 
 
 Whether Tesla's sales force orchestrated the planet’s biggest continuous clearance event, or some suspicious activity was occurring—this is what had people puzzled.
 <a href="https://insideevs.com/news/752820/tesla-accused-of-gaming-rebates-canada/?utm_source=msn.com&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=msn-feed">
 The Canadian Automobile Dealers Association claims
 </a>
 Anyway, this level of scrutiny has been sufficient for Canadian officials to step in and subsequently freeze the payments to the American automobile company.
 
 
 "As soon as I took office asTransport Minister, I instructed thedepartment to halt all paymentsfor Tesla vehicles so we couldthoroughly review eachclaim independently and ascertainwhether they were all legitimateand qualified," statedformer Transport Minister,Chrystia Freeland, in astatement.
 <a href="https://www.thestar.com/news/canada/canada-freezes-tesla-s-43-million-rebate-payments-bars-it-from-future-rebates-because-of/article_d93ae97a-944c-41c6-bae0-63e905050d87.html">
 Toronto Star
 </a>
 No payments will be issued until we ensure the validity of the claims.
 
 
 More than 200 individual dealerships are holding onto a total of $10 million CAD ($7 million USD). These dealers provided loans directly to their clients with the expectation of being compensated through the iZEV program. However, when the program was halted, they could not process 2,295 rebate claims, leading some dealers to contemplate layoffs due to the lack of anticipated funding.
 
 
 Freeland indicates that these dealers will eventually receive full compensation.
 
 <h2>
 Gaming in Canada: A Tesla Custom
 </h2>
 <img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/image/AA1BLUZD" data-reference="image" src="https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1BLUZD.jpg"/>
 <div class="source-title">
 Photo by: Tesla
 </div>
 
 This isn’t Tesla’s first time navigating loosely defined incentive schemes. Do you recall their Canada-exclusive compliance vehicle? Perhaps not. Let’s briefly revisit the start of the iZEV initiative together.
 
 
 To be eligible for the iZEV program in 2019, vehicles were required to adhere to numerous criteria. A key requirement involved the initial manufacturer’s suggested retail price (MSRP). For instance, the Tesla Model 3, which has less than six seats, had to have an entry-level price under $45,000 CAD. However, before joining the iZEV initiative, Tesla listed the Model 3 SR+ at $52,990 CAD in Canada.
 
 
 This is where things get interesting.
 
 
 Tesla subsequently introduced its compliant version. Priced at an even $44,999 CAD—one dollar under the threshold—purchasers of the entry-level Model 3 gained ownership of a vehicle capable of traveling a total of 94 miles per charge. It’s worth noting that Musk had earlier stated that he considered 250 miles of range to be "
 <a href="https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1282496094908243968">
 unacceptably low
 </a>
 " for its vehicles.
 
 
 On the positive side, buyers of SR+ models also qualified for the iZEV incentive. However, the ultimate outcome was that Canadian taxpayers inadvertently provided subsidies totaling $115 million CAD to Tesla purchasers, solely due to the existence of this regulatory vehicle.
 
 
 More details about Tesla's subsidies in Canada can be found here.
 <a href="https://www.thestar.com/news/canada/canada-freezes-tesla-s-43-million-rebate-payments-bars-it-from-future-rebates-because-of/article_d93ae97a-944c-41c6-bae0-63e905050d87.html">
 Toronto Star
 </a>
 :
 
 <blockquote>
 
 Tesla has received the largest share of Canadian electric vehicle incentives, totaling $713 million since 2019. This extensive use of public funds has upset many people, particularly as Musk pushes for significant reductions in U.S. government initiatives and large-scale firings of federal employees. Demonstrations against Tesla have occurred across borders, with incidents of vandalism targeting Tesla cars becoming more common.
 
 
 The head of Canada’s Automotive Parts Manufacturers’ Association, Flavio Volpe, expressed his approval for the investigation being launched.
 
 
 Tesla took advantage of the iZEV program by introducing its China-produced vehicles to benefit from Canadian incentives, even as its CEO claimed 'Canada is not a real country' on X. It seems they have created this situation themselves.
 
 </blockquote>
 <h2>
 Politics, Politics, Politics
 </h2>
 <img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/image/AA1AM3VI" data-reference="image" src="https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1AM3VI.jpg"/>
 <div class="source-title">
 Photo by: White House
 </div>
 
 It's not just
 <a href="https://insideevs.com/news/754063/cm-2025-03-20/?utm_source=msn.com&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=msn-feed">
 Tesla's odd accounting
 </a>
 That situation shows Canada tightening its purse strings. The whole nation is currently weary of American politics, and Musk (who acts as the foremost ally) isn’t making things easier for the car manufacturer.
 
 
 His close rapport with U.S. President Donald Trump and his readiness to call Canada "not a real country"
 <a href="https://archive.is/p6w21">
 In a post that has since been removed from X
 </a>
 ) has left the Canadian government hesitant to offer any concessions to the American automaker. Actually, Freeland states that Canada will guarantee Tesla remains entirely disqualified from
 any
 upcoming iZEV programs in Canada until the U.S. reinstates duties on Canadian goods:
 
 
 "I have instructed my department to modify the eligibility requirements for upcoming iZEV programs to make sure that Tesla vehicles do not qualify for these incentives as long as the unjustified and unlawful U.S. tariffs remain in place against Canada," stated Freeland.
 
 
 The outcome of it all? A circumstance so distinctively unique.
 Tesla
 It feels more like a plot from a Netflix series rather than something you’d encounter in reality. Politicians are furious, the head of an automobile company is entangled in political maneuvers, car dealerships are losing substantial amounts due to a suspicious agreement, and customers who previously praised driving this electric vehicle with the most appealing brand logo are now distancing themselves from the manufacturer.
 
 
 Canada seized this chance not only to revoke Tesla’s subsidies but also took drastic measures nationwide to set a stern precedent for the brand. This has left Tesla realizing that breaking regulations comes with significant repercussions, particularly under global scrutiny where the credibility of its leadership appears to erode faster than it can be regained.
 
 <h2>
 More Tesla News
 </h2>


 <ul>
 
 <li>
 <a href="https://insideevs.com/news/754472/trump-tariffs-are-coming-anyway/?utm_source=msn.com&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=msn-feed">
 Surprise: Auto Imposing Tariffs Continues To Be Considered
 </a>
 </li>
 
 
 <li>
 <a href="https://insideevs.com/news/754516/ev-sales-europe-january-february-2025-tesla-freefall/?utm_source=msn.com&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=msn-feed">
 Tesla Is Plunging in Europe Despite an Increase in Electric Vehicle Sales in February
 </a>
 </li>
 
 
 <li>
 <a href="https://insideevs.com/news/754161/tesla-cybertruck-sales-falling-panels/?utm_source=msn.com&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=msn-feed">
 Tesla Cybertruck Sales Are Dropping
 </a>
 </li>
 
 
 <li>
 <a href="https://insideevs.com/news/754274/tesla-all-hands-q1-speech/?utm_source=msn.com&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=msn-feed">
 Elon Musk Truly Desires for Tesla Shareholders to Believe He Isn’t Absent
 </a>
 </li>
 
 </ul>

Tesla Axed from Canada's EV Rebate Program After Exploiting the Rules

Unknown business, cars, electric cars, government regulations, tesla

Tesla applied for over $43 million in electric vehicle rebates, but Canadian authorities decided to revoke the company's eligibility instead. Tesla is entering its "find out" era…

NI Tourism Sector Divided Over New Travel Permit Impact

Unknown business, government regulations, passports and international travel, tourists, travel

<img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/image/AA1C9Orq" data-reference="image" src="https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1C9Orq.jpg"/>

 Even with cautions, extending a UK travel visa program for tourists from the European Union isn’t affecting tourism in Northern Ireland, say several industry players.


 Starting Tuesday, travelers from the European Union will require an electronic travel authorization (ETA), similar to visitors from the rest of the world, for entry into the United Kingdom.


 The leader of the Northern Ireland Tourism Alliance has stated that this situation creates an obstacle for visitors who enter the Republic of Ireland and might want to explore Northern Ireland as well.


 Nonetheless, both a hotel chain and a travel agency informed diwida.News that they haven't experienced any effects on their operations.


 Colin Johnston, the managing director of the Galgorm Collection, stated that although the industry had lobbied against the ETA, when it was properly communicated to tourists, "they find it acceptable and comprehend it."


 During his appearance on the diwida.News | Talkback program, he mentioned that several guests were intimidated by the "significant negative sentiment in our media" regarding the ETA. He also noted that "by persistently discussing it, we might be causing more harm to ourselves."


 Heather Rennie McGill from Rabbie's touring company mentioned that this situation revolves around "the aspect of communication and simplifying procedures for our clients to handle the necessary legal requirements for entering the country."


 She mentioned that upon the initial introduction of the ETA in 2023 for travelers heading to the UK from non-EU countries, there was some effect "on the quality of service or customer care we needed to provide," however she did not observe this impacting their reservations.


 She mentioned that the system was inducing stress among certain customers and imposing an unwanted additional expense.


 The UK government has stated that the ETA will aid in stopping misuse of the immigration framework.

<h2>
 'Deeply concerned'
</h2>
<img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/image/AA1C9Emj" data-reference="image" src="https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1C9Emj.jpg"/>

 The leader of the Northern Ireland Tourism Alliance, Joanne Stuart, has stated that several tour operators are excluding Northern Ireland from their trip plans to the island of Ireland because of the program’s expansion.


 We are highlighted as part of the island of Ireland, and this has consistently been grounded in smooth travel experiences.


 She informed diwIDA.News that 69% of those vacationing in Northern Ireland arrive via the Republic.


 We have placed this obstacle in our path... and now we are beginning to feel the effects of it.


 During her address at the Northern Ireland Assembly on Tuesday, Economy Minister Caoimhe Archibald expressed deep concern regarding the consequences of implementing the ETA scheme and how this might affect the region’s tourism industry.


 Archibald mentioned that she had interacted with the UK government just last week regarding this matter and reiterated her call for an exemption of Northern Ireland from the plan.


 Previously requested exemptions for Northern Ireland
 were rejected
 According to the previous UK government, this would create an “unacceptable gap” in the country’s border security.

<h2>
 What does ETA stand for, and how can you obtain one?
</h2>

 The ETA is a document required by non-British and non-Irish citizens, who aren’t obligated to obtain a visa, for entering the UK.


 This will encompass international tourists who land in Dublin with intentions to visit Northern Ireland afterward.


 The current application cost for the UK ETA via the app or online at GOV.UK is £10; however, starting from April 9th, this fee will increase to £16.


 As per the official government site, applicants for an ETA typically receive a response within 3 business days; however, they also state that numerous applications can be processed even more swiftly.


 The travel journalist Lisa Minot informed diwida.News | News NI that for many individuals, this process should only take "a few minutes."


 An Electronic Travel Authorization (ETA) remains valid for two years or until your passport expires, allowing you unlimited visits to the UK during this period.

<ul>
 <li>
 UK denies travel permit exception for Northern Ireland visitors
 </li>
 <li>
 Tourism chief claims travel permits could hurt Northern Ireland's hotel industry
 </li>
 <li>
 Minister cautions about effects of electronic travel authorization
 </li>
</ul>

NI Tourism Sector Divided Over New Travel Permit Impact

Unknown business, government regulations, passports and international travel, tourists, travel

Even with cautions, extending a UK travel visa program for tourists from the European Union isn’t affecting tourism in Northern Ireland, say several industry players. Starting Tuesday, travelers fr…

Laws to guarantee salmon farming in Macquarie Harbour to be introduced at 'last minute'

Unknown government, government regulations, politics, politics and government, public policy

<img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/image/AA1Af9zQ" data-reference="image" src="https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1Af9zQ.jpg"/>
<div>
 
 New laws ensuring the ongoing operation of salmon farming in Macquarie Harbour along Tasmania’s western shoreline are set to be presented in federal parliament today—and are expected to succeed with backing from the Coalition.
 
 
 The Labor Party entered office with a pledge to
 strengthen Australia's environmental laws
 , but seems destined to conclude its tenure by opting for
 scaling back
 a part of them.
 
 
 In some situations, these regulations diminish the public’s — as well as environmental organizations’ — ability to scrutinize previous federal environmental judgments.
 
 
 ABC acknowledges that the legislation eliminates the environment minister's power to reassess past decisions if these matters have persisted for a minimum of five years and were sanctioned under conditional terms involving state-specific regulations.
 
 
 These regulations are designed to prevent the minister from revisiting the decision regarding salmon farming in Macquarie Harbour, which was initiated due to petitions from environmental organizations. Nevertheless, these rules might also be used to challenge other present or upcoming approvals.
 
 
 The government aims to get the legislation approved by both chambers of Parliament by the close of Wednesday.
 
 
 Prime Minister Anthony Albanese stated this move will offer clarity for the salmon industry employees working along Tasmania's western coastline.
 
 
 "Our government has no regrets about backing employment, that’s precisely what the Labor Party is all about," he stated.
 
 <blockquote>
 
 We back job creation, yet we equally advocate for sustainability. This is why we have committed $37 million towards sustainable initiatives, including enhancing oxygen levels.
 
 </blockquote>
 <h4>
 The Coalition pledges backing for the bill.
 </h4>
 
 In 2012, a prior Labor administration permitted the enlargement of salmon farming operations within Macquarie Harbor. They determined this activity did not qualify as a controlled action and thus needed to be regulated at the state level instead.
 
 
 But numbers of the endangered Maugean skate — a rare, stingray-like fish species found only in the harbour and a living link to the dinosaur age, reliant on dissolved oxygen — were estimated to have fallen by 47 per cent by 2021.
 
 
 This triggered the reconsideration request by environmental groups, and the Commonwealth
 funded an oxygenation trial
 and a
 captive breeding program
 .
 
 
 A recent study stated that the population had stabilised after
 a period of decline
 reported over a decade leading up to 2020.
 
 
 The Coalition has guaranteed its support for the legislation, having urged the government to introduce it sooner.
 
 
 Coalition Environment, Fisheries and Forestry spokesperson Jonathon Duniam said the opposition would work constructively to see it pass parliament.
 
 
 "The government, having left it to the last minute, now need to work with us in good faith to ensure that any improvements needed are made, any loopholes we find can be closed," he said.
 
 <blockquote>
 
 "It also prevents vexatious green groups from doing this sort of thing again, to a degree, in the future.
 
 </blockquote>
 
 "We're working with industry to see whether it does meet their expectation."
 
 [Map: Mac harbour]
 
 Some crossbenchers were briefed on the legislation on Monday, however there are concerns at the limited time to debate it.
 
 
 Tasmanian senator Jacqui Lambie said the government had the wrong priorities.
 
 <blockquote>
 
 "You can guarantee the mining companies would never get away with an exemption of what salmon is asking for," she said.
 
 </blockquote>
 
 "Because apparently, that is what your government is prioritising … talking about salmon, instead of talking about reducing our energy bills in this country.
 
 
 "That's what we're talking about, a stinking little fish."
 
 <h4>
 Green groups pivot to raise awareness on law change
 </h4>
 
 The issue of salmon farming in Tasmania has garnered increased national attention in recent months.
 
 
 The industry has been experiencing a
 mass die-off
 caused by a bacterial disease in south-east Tasmania, on the other side of the state to Macquarie Harbour.
 
 
 The plight of the Maugean skate has also attracted national environmental campaigns.
 
 
 This week, some environmental groups — including Greenpeace and the Australian Conservation Foundation — agreed to shift its focus to salmon farming, instead of the Coalition's nuclear energy policy.
 
 
 Greenpeace head of nature Glenn Walker said the group wanted to inform the public of Labor's decision to scale back the ability to review environmental decisions.
 
 <blockquote>
 
 "The prime minister promised to end extinctions. The prime minister promised to strengthen our nature laws, this week he is doing the opposite," he said.
 
 </blockquote>
 
 "So it's become a national issue of national importance that we push back and ensure the community understands what the prime minister is about to do."
 
 
 Earlier this month, a freedom of information request showed that, in 2023, salmon farming in Macquarie Harbour was "likely" to be considered a controlled action which would require a full review.
 
 
 Advice to Environment Minister Tanya Plibersek also encouraged a "low impact redesign of salmon farming".
 
 
 The document was prepared several months after conservation advice to Ms Plibersek urged that salmon farms reduce stocking rates prior to the upcoming summer.
 
 
 This document described
 salmon farming as the primary reason
 for the Maugean skate's decline.
 
 
 All three salmon companies operating out of Tasmanian waters — Brazilian multinational JBS; New Zealand's Petuna; and Canadian aquaculture giant Cooke, owner of Tassal — are owned by foreign multinationals.
 
</div>

Laws to guarantee salmon farming in Macquarie Harbour to be introduced at 'last minute'

Unknown government, government regulations, politics, politics and government, public policy

New laws ensuring the ongoing operation of salmon farming in Macquarie Harbour along Tasmania’s western shoreline are set to be presented in federal parliament today—and are expected to succeed w…

Report: Trump Folds, Won't Hold Automakers To Tariffs

Unknown automotive industry, business, cars, commerce, government regulations

<img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/image/AA1AaJh1" data-reference="image" src="https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1AaJh1.jpg"/>
 <h3>
 Trump has already delayed tariffs on imported cars twice since his inauguration.
 </h3>
 
 US President Donald Trump’s proposed tariffs on the automotive industry might not go into effect on April 2. A new report suggests the administration could take a more targeted approach to implementing Trump’s economic vision, focusing on reciprocal tariffs toward certain countries instead of sectorial ones that apply to specific industries.
 
 
 Trump first proposed a 25-percent tariff on auto imports from Canada and Mexico hours after his inauguration. He delayed them in early February for 30 days. The tariff
 went into effect on March 4
 , but Trump paused them again one day later, setting April 2 as the new deadline while announcing a 25-percent tariff on
 all auto imports
 to take effect the same day.
 
 
 However,
 The Wall Street Journal
 reports that the administration might not announce tariffs that target specific industrial sectors on April 2, as previously proposed. According to the report, the fate of the tariffs on Canadian and Mexican auto imports remains uncertain. They might be delayed, tempered, or abandoned altogether in favor of reciprocal tariffs that could still include some goods from the US’s closest trading partners.
 
 
 The threat of tariffs has created uncertainty in the automotive industry. Automakers are considering a range of options to mitigate the potential new tax that
 could raise prices
 and hurt workers. Audi is considering
 passing some of the costs onto consumers
 while
 Hyundai isn't as worried about the potential fallout
 .
 
 
 What Trump will likely announce on April 2 are reciprocal tariffs, but the last few months are proof that the administration is willing to change its mind at a moment’s notice, and nothing is certain.
 
 <h2>
 Tariff Talk:
 </h2>


 <ul>
 
 <li>
 Hyundai's US Investments Mean It's Not Worried About Tariffs
 </li>
 
 
 <li>
 Dealer Tells Fox Business ‘Nobody Is Gonna Buy’ Trucks Thanks to Tariffs
 </li>
 
 </ul>


 
 Source: The Wall Street Journal via
 Detroit Free Press

Report: Trump Folds, Won't Hold Automakers To Tariffs

Unknown automotive industry, business, cars, commerce, government regulations

Trump has already delayed tariffs on imported cars twice since his inauguration. US President Donald Trump’s proposed tariffs on the automotive industry might not go into effect on April …

Report: Trump Backs Down, Exempts Automakers from Tariffs

Unknown automotive industry, business, cars, commerce, government regulations

<img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/image/AA1AaNgO" data-reference="image" src="https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1AaNgO.jpg"/>
 <h3>
 Trump has postponed levies on incoming vehicles two times since taking office.
 </h3>
 
 The planned tariffs on the auto industry proposed by US President Donald Trump may not be implemented on April 2nd as initially scheduled. According to recent reports, his administration might adopt a more focused strategy for enacting his economic plan. This would involve retaliatory tariffs aimed at particular nations rather than broad-based duties targeting entire sectors like autos.
 
 
 Trump first proposed a 25-percent tariff on auto imports from Canada and Mexico hours after his inauguration. He delayed them in early February for 30 days. The tariff
 came into force on March 4th
 , but Trump paused them again one day later, setting April 2 as the new deadline while announcing a 25-percent tariff on
 all auto imports
 to take effect the same day.
 
 
 However,
 The Wall Street Journal
 reports that the administration might not announce tariffs that target specific industrial sectors on April 2, as previously proposed. According to the report, the fate of the tariffs on Canadian and Mexican auto imports remains uncertain. They might be delayed, tempered, or abandoned altogether in favor of reciprocal tariffs that could still include some goods from the US’s closest trading partners.
 
 
 The threat of tariffs has created uncertainty in the automotive industry. Automakers are considering a range of options to mitigate the potential new tax that
 could raise prices
 and hurt workers. Audi is considering
 passing some of the costs onto consumers
 while
 Hyundai isn't as worried about the potential fallout
 .
 
 
 What Trump will likely announce on April 2 are reciprocal tariffs, but the last few months are proof that the administration is willing to change its mind at a moment’s notice, and nothing is certain.
 
 <h2>
 Tariff Talk:
 </h2>


 <ul>
 
 <li>
 Hyundai's US Investments Mean It's Not Worried About Tariffs
 </li>
 
 
 <li>
 Dealer Tells Fox Business ‘Nobody Is Gonna Buy’ Trucks Thanks to Tariffs
 </li>
 
 </ul>


 
 Source: The Wall Street Journal via
 Detroit Free Press

Report: Trump Backs Down, Exempts Automakers from Tariffs

Unknown automotive industry, business, cars, commerce, government regulations

Trump has postponed levies on incoming vehicles two times since taking office. The planned tariffs on the auto industry proposed by US President Donald Trump may not be implemented on Apr…

Doge Updates: Over 300,000 Credit Cards Suspended Today

Unknown business, government, government regulations, news, politics and government

<img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/video/AA1ByP3i" data-reference="video"/>

 On Monday, Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency declared that nearly 300,000 government credit cards have been revoked.


 In a post on X on Sunday, DOGE announced that following a five-week trial program aimed at auditing inactive or unnecessary credit cards, approximately 298,000 were deactivated altogether.


 "Please remember, when the audit began, there were approximately 4.6 million active cards/accounts, indicating that further efforts are necessary," the post also noted.


 In February, DOGE stated that the active credit cards had facilitated 90 million distinct transactions amounting to approximately $40 billion in spending for the 2024 fiscal year.

<img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/image/AA1ByTk2" data-reference="image" src="https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1ByTk2.jpg"/>
<h2>
 
 Key Alterations to Microenterprise Financing
 
</h2>

 DOGE has declared that loans provided by the Small Business Administration (SBA) are now governed by updated regulations.


 The SBA-administered loans now necessitate including the applicant’s date of birth, and individuals who are either under 18 or over 120 years old can no longer avail themselves of these direct loans.


 "Such basic verification processes serve as preliminary measures to reduce fraud within government payment initiatives," DOGE stated in an X post.


 This follows the SBA’s statement
 It will reduce its staff by 43 percent.
 , eliminating approximately 2,700 positions from the agency’s total workforce of nearly 6,500 employees. These reductions will occur via a mix of voluntary departures, the end ofCOVID-19 era and other temporary assignments, along with a “restricted” number of layoffs, according to the SBA.


 The SBA stated that these reductions will not affect "essential" services provided to the public, such as the agency’s loan guarantee initiatives and disaster aid programs, along with its field offices and veteran operations.


 The reductions in staff will result in savings of over $435 million each year for taxpayers by the fiscal year 2026, as stated by the SBA.


 "Similar to the small business owners we assist, we need to achieve more with fewer resources," said the SBA Administrator.
 Kelly Loeffler
 said in a statement.


 We have thus presented proposals aimed at achieving a strategic overhaul designed to align the organization and its assets more closely with our original mandate. Through the elimination of roles not essential for fulfilling this mission and combining various operations, we aim to restore staffing numbers similar to those during the final administration under President Trump—a period marked by unprecedented economic prosperity. Our renewed emphasis will be placed on fostering expansion within the private sector alongside providing disaster assistance, ensuring these efforts reflect transparency, effectiveness, and tangible outcomes.

<h2>
 
 How Many Jobs Has Doge Eliminated So Far?
 
</h2>

 Tens of thousands of job losses have been announced across numerous federal agencies.


 The Environmental Protection Agency intends to abolish its scientific research division, potentially resulting in the dismissal of over 1,000 scientists and additional staff members, as stated by The Associated Press on Tuesday.


 In early March, reports indicated that the Internal Revenue Service had faced some issues.
 planning to let go of around 18,000 workers
 , which equates to roughly 20 percent of its employees. In the meantime, Postmaster General Louis DeJoy stated
 Congress
 That approximately 10,000 employees at the United States Postal Service would be terminated within a month.


 The Department of Education has revealed intentions to terminate employment.
 more than 1,300 employees
 While the Department of Veterans Affairs is planning a restructuring that involves eliminating approximately 80,000 positions, as revealed by an internal memorandum acquired by the Associated Press this month.


 Meanwhile, the
 Pentagon
 is
 apparently intending to reduce its non-military staff
 By approximately 50,000 to 60,000 individuals.


 Since President Trump assumed office, at least 24,000 probationary employees have been dismissed, as stated in a lawsuit brought forth by almost 20 states claiming these widespread terminations violate the law. In the previous week, two federal judges addressed this issue.
 ordered 19 federal agencies
 to bring back probationary employees who were let go.


 Meanwhile,
 approximately 75,000 government employees agreed to
 The proposal to resign in exchange for getting paid and benefits up till September 30.

<h2>
 
 How much spending has DOGE reduced so far?
 
</h2>

 DOGE claims its initiatives have saved the federal government approximately $115 billion as of March 11—a mere sliver compared to Musk's contributions.
 $1 trillion cost-cutting goal
 .


 According to DOGE, the records posted on their site—which detail contract, grant, and lease cancellations—account for roughly 30% of overall savings. This suggests that the initial saving amount cannot be fully confirmed at this time.


 As per the Musk Watch DOGE Tracker created by data analyst Brian Banks, the confirmed savings amounted to approximately $8.6 billion as of March 11.

<h2>
 
 Is DOGE a governmental organization?
 
</h2>

 On January 20, Trump issued an executive order during his return to office on his first day back.
 officially creating
 DOGE aims to update "federal technology and software to enhance governmental efficiency and productivity."


 Even though it bears such a title, this entity isn’t a governmental body established through legislation; instead, it functions as a special unit aimed at combating inefficiency and deceit within the federal administration.


 
 Related Articles
 
 <ul>
 <li>
 FBI Warns About Tesla Threats
 </li>
 <li>
 Dogecoin Outlines Key Updates for Small Business Lending: Important InformationToProps
 </li>
 <li>
 Vulnerabilities Persist in Election Security Despite Federal Government Efforts | Opinion
 </li>
 <li>
 Demonstrations Erupt Nationwide Due to Proposals for Postal Service Overhaul
 </li>
 </ul>


 Start your unlimited trial

Doge Updates: Over 300,000 Credit Cards Suspended Today

Unknown business, government, government regulations, news, politics and government

On Monday, Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency declared that nearly 300,000 government credit cards have been revoked. In a post on X on Sunday, DOGE announced that following a five-wee…

PAS Told: Shape Up in 4 States Before Aiming for Federal Power

Unknown business, government, government regulations, politics, politics and government

<img data-document-id="cms/api/amp/image/AA1BsfKQ" data-reference="image" src="https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1BsfKQ.jpg"/>

 PETALING JAYA: Perikatan Nasional should showcase its ability to develop the four states it governs and improve their economy if the coalition believes it can do a better job of governing the country, says a PKR leader.


 Nik Nazmi Nik Ahmad, a PKR vice-president, said the PAS-run states of Kelantan, Terengganu, Kedah and Perlis have not seen any significant changes in terms of economy and development under opposition rule.


 PAS is a dominant partner in Perikatan Nasional, which includes Bersatu, Gerakan and MIPP.


 Nik Nazmi accused PN of failing to improve the economy of these four states (also known as the ‘state government four’ or ‘SG4’).


 “The SG4 Group Sdn Bhd set up last year which supposedly would bring economic development to the four states has proven to be impractical and ineffective in developing these states,” he told FMT.


 Nik Nazmi, a federal minister, was responding to PN chairman Muhyiddin Yassin’s claim that the opposition coalition was capable of managing the country a lot better than the unity government and would be able to resolve basic issues.


 Muhyiddin stated that Malaysians were experiencing a tough period as the cost of items was increasing while their earnings stayed unchanged.


 Nik Nazmi said Muhyiddin’s short-lived tenure as prime minister was fraught with economic shortcomings while PN has also been ineffective and disappointing as an opposition bloc in Parliament.


 He accused the coalition’s MPs of failing to pose substantive and intelligent questions that would ultimately benefit the people in the Dewan Rakyat.


 “PN’s shadow Cabinet has also failed to perform as an effective check and balance. They didn’t even offer an alternative budget for the people to evaluate theirs (against the government’s),” he said.

PAS Told: Shape Up in 4 States Before Aiming for Federal Power

Unknown business, government, government regulations, politics, politics and government

PETALING JAYA: Perikatan Nasional should showcase its ability to develop the four states it governs and improve their economy if the coalition believes it can do a better job of governing the countr…